Giving or not giving? Experienced EFL university teachers’ beliefs and rationales of written feedback

Englisia Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.22373/ej.v11i1.19318
Sri Rejeki Murtiningsih, Agus Sumantri, Sibakhul Milad Malik Hidayatulloh
{"title":"Giving or not giving? Experienced EFL university teachers’ beliefs and rationales of written feedback","authors":"Sri Rejeki Murtiningsih, Agus Sumantri, Sibakhul Milad Malik Hidayatulloh","doi":"10.22373/ej.v11i1.19318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This current research aims to investigate the beliefs and rationales of EFL university teachers about giving or not giving written feedback to their students. The researchers employed a descriptive qualitative approach in the execution of this study. Three experienced EFL university teachers agreed to participate in in-depth interviews to gain the data. This research revealed five distinct beliefs regarding providing written feedback. They hold beliefs about giving feedback based on the importance of giving feedback, the role of giving feedback to other types of feedback, the length of feedback, students' competence-based in giving feedback, and the importance of giving balanced feedback. As for their rationales for giving and not-giving feedback, several findings were documented. They provided written feedback because it gave some crucial information by showing students' identifiable learning records and enhancing their academic output. Also, it holds relevance to the teachers’ teaching profession. On the other hand, their rationale for not-giving written feedback could be noticed as written feedback, to some extent, demotivated students and took much more time to provide feedback. In the end, teachers' pedagogical implications are also presented by recalling the findings of this current research.","PeriodicalId":32331,"journal":{"name":"Englisia","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Englisia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v11i1.19318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This current research aims to investigate the beliefs and rationales of EFL university teachers about giving or not giving written feedback to their students. The researchers employed a descriptive qualitative approach in the execution of this study. Three experienced EFL university teachers agreed to participate in in-depth interviews to gain the data. This research revealed five distinct beliefs regarding providing written feedback. They hold beliefs about giving feedback based on the importance of giving feedback, the role of giving feedback to other types of feedback, the length of feedback, students' competence-based in giving feedback, and the importance of giving balanced feedback. As for their rationales for giving and not-giving feedback, several findings were documented. They provided written feedback because it gave some crucial information by showing students' identifiable learning records and enhancing their academic output. Also, it holds relevance to the teachers’ teaching profession. On the other hand, their rationale for not-giving written feedback could be noticed as written feedback, to some extent, demotivated students and took much more time to provide feedback. In the end, teachers' pedagogical implications are also presented by recalling the findings of this current research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
给予还是不给予?经验丰富的英语大学教师的信念和书面反馈的理由
本研究旨在探讨英语大学教师对给予或不给予学生书面反馈的信念和依据。研究人员在本研究的执行中采用了描述性定性方法。三位经验丰富的英语大学教师同意参与深度访谈以获得数据。这项研究揭示了关于提供书面反馈的五种不同观念。他们对给予反馈的信念基于给予反馈的重要性、给予其他类型反馈的作用、反馈的长度、学生给予反馈的能力以及给予平衡反馈的重要性。至于他们给出和不给出反馈的理由,有几个发现被记录下来。他们提供书面反馈,因为它通过展示学生可识别的学习记录和提高他们的学术成果,提供了一些重要的信息。此外,它还与教师的教学专业相关。另一方面,他们不给予书面反馈的理由可以被认为是书面反馈,在某种程度上,让学生失去动力,花更多的时间来提供反馈。最后,通过回顾本研究的发现,提出了教师的教学启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Measuring the endangering stage of indigenous Gayonese language and its relation to English as a global language Portraying Indonesian English language teachers’ readiness for teaching online classes The development of syntactic complexity in university students’ essays Responses and preferences of rural Islamic university EFL learners for written corrective feedback EFL students’ emotional responses to oral feedback: The case of Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1