Error analysis on students’ essay writing: A case study

Englisia Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.22373/ej.v11i1.15009
Ribut Surjowati
{"title":"Error analysis on students’ essay writing: A case study","authors":"Ribut Surjowati","doi":"10.22373/ej.v11i1.15009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to determine the types of errors committed by the students of the English Department at the Faculty of Language and Science, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University (FBS UWKS), as well as to describe the origins of these errors. The research conducted was descriptive in nature, utilizing qualitative methods. The participants involved in the study were fourth semester students of the English Department at FBS UWKS. Out of the 20 participants, a total of 80 data sources were obtained during the learning process. The researchers collected the data through the use of interview sheets and essays. Once collected, the data underwent a process of reduction, classification, display, and analysis. The procedures for data analysis were outlined as follows: 1) the collection of essays, 2) the classification, counting, and analysis of errors based on the error types proposed by Brown (2007), and 3) the analysis of errors to identify their sources using the concepts of interlingual transfer and intralingual transfer as proposed by Brown (2007) and Touchie (1986). From the analysis, it was discovered that the errors could be categorized into two main groups, namely essay organization errors and grammatical errors. The essay organization errors consisted of seven classifications, including issues with the thesis statement, topic sentences, unity, coherence and cohesion, as well as supporting sentences. On the other hand, the grammatical errors encompassed omission, addition, and punctuation mistakes. The sources of these errors were found to be inadequate learning, false conceptualizations, overgeneralization, and ineffective teaching practices.","PeriodicalId":32331,"journal":{"name":"Englisia","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Englisia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v11i1.15009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this research is to determine the types of errors committed by the students of the English Department at the Faculty of Language and Science, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University (FBS UWKS), as well as to describe the origins of these errors. The research conducted was descriptive in nature, utilizing qualitative methods. The participants involved in the study were fourth semester students of the English Department at FBS UWKS. Out of the 20 participants, a total of 80 data sources were obtained during the learning process. The researchers collected the data through the use of interview sheets and essays. Once collected, the data underwent a process of reduction, classification, display, and analysis. The procedures for data analysis were outlined as follows: 1) the collection of essays, 2) the classification, counting, and analysis of errors based on the error types proposed by Brown (2007), and 3) the analysis of errors to identify their sources using the concepts of interlingual transfer and intralingual transfer as proposed by Brown (2007) and Touchie (1986). From the analysis, it was discovered that the errors could be categorized into two main groups, namely essay organization errors and grammatical errors. The essay organization errors consisted of seven classifications, including issues with the thesis statement, topic sentences, unity, coherence and cohesion, as well as supporting sentences. On the other hand, the grammatical errors encompassed omission, addition, and punctuation mistakes. The sources of these errors were found to be inadequate learning, false conceptualizations, overgeneralization, and ineffective teaching practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生论文写作的错误分析:个案研究
本研究的目的是确定维加亚苏苏马泗水大学语言与科学学院英语系学生所犯的错误类型,并描述这些错误的来源。所进行的研究本质上是描述性的,采用定性方法。本研究的参与者为FBS UWKS英语系第四学期的学生。在20名参与者中,在学习过程中总共获得了80个数据源。研究人员通过访谈表和论文收集数据。一旦收集到数据,将经历一个简化、分类、显示和分析的过程。数据分析的程序概述如下:1)收集论文,2)根据Brown(2007)提出的错误类型对错误进行分类、计数和分析,以及3)使用Brown(2007)和Touchie(1986)提出的语际迁移和语内迁移概念对错误进行分析以确定其来源。从分析中发现,错误可以分为两大类,即文章组织错误和语法错误。文章组织错误分为七类,包括论文陈述句问题、主题句问题、统一性、连贯性和衔接问题以及支持句问题。另一方面,语法错误包括省略、添加和标点错误。这些错误的来源被发现是学习不足、错误的概念、过度概括和无效的教学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Measuring the endangering stage of indigenous Gayonese language and its relation to English as a global language Portraying Indonesian English language teachers’ readiness for teaching online classes The development of syntactic complexity in university students’ essays Responses and preferences of rural Islamic university EFL learners for written corrective feedback EFL students’ emotional responses to oral feedback: The case of Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1