“Wise priest”: dominant agent in the religious field

Anna Panteleeva
{"title":"“Wise priest”: dominant agent in the religious field","authors":"Anna Panteleeva","doi":"10.15382/sturi2023109.130-142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of a study conducted in one of the parishes of the Lipetsk region from 2019 to 2022. The study took place in two stages: the first stage took place in July-August 2019, the second - in July-August 2022. The study used predominantly non-included observation. During the study, the author kept observation diaries. On the example of the parish of D., the author of the article studied, described and analyzed the practices of interaction between the priest and parishioners.The theoretical sources of the study were the works of P. Bourdieu. In the article we pay special attention to the possibilities of applying the theoretical model of P. Bourdieu in the study of religious tradition. Our results show that, despite not certain limitations, the theoretical framework we have chosen allows us to see and describe the unmanifested mechanisms that affect the interaction between the priest and parishioners.One of the features of the arrival of D., which aroused research interest, was its rather high degree of conflict. For a long period, the parishioners quite actively and uncompromisingly clashed with all the priests who were appointed to this parish. The situation changed not so long ago, after the appointment of Fr. A. The new priest managed to build a more balanced relationship with the arrival and stop the demonstratively defiant behavior of the parishioners.The conflict between priest and parishioner can be described in terms of habitus, fields, capital, and the hierarchy of the dominant positions of the field. These observations allow us to state that in the conflict between the priest and the parish, the conflict of two habituses is manifested, the carriers of which are, on the one hand, the priest, and on the other, the parishioners. The basis for updating the contradictions is the reduction of the distance, both physical and social, between the priest and the parish, as well as the fundamental impossibility of an effective transfer of capital between fields.Overcoming conflicts, we assume, may be associated with the restoration of social distance and the efforts of the priest to change mental structures, which should subsequently lead to a change in the habitus of parishioners.","PeriodicalId":40777,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta-Seriya I-Bogoslovie-Filosofiya-Religiovedenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta-Seriya I-Bogoslovie-Filosofiya-Religiovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturi2023109.130-142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study conducted in one of the parishes of the Lipetsk region from 2019 to 2022. The study took place in two stages: the first stage took place in July-August 2019, the second - in July-August 2022. The study used predominantly non-included observation. During the study, the author kept observation diaries. On the example of the parish of D., the author of the article studied, described and analyzed the practices of interaction between the priest and parishioners.The theoretical sources of the study were the works of P. Bourdieu. In the article we pay special attention to the possibilities of applying the theoretical model of P. Bourdieu in the study of religious tradition. Our results show that, despite not certain limitations, the theoretical framework we have chosen allows us to see and describe the unmanifested mechanisms that affect the interaction between the priest and parishioners.One of the features of the arrival of D., which aroused research interest, was its rather high degree of conflict. For a long period, the parishioners quite actively and uncompromisingly clashed with all the priests who were appointed to this parish. The situation changed not so long ago, after the appointment of Fr. A. The new priest managed to build a more balanced relationship with the arrival and stop the demonstratively defiant behavior of the parishioners.The conflict between priest and parishioner can be described in terms of habitus, fields, capital, and the hierarchy of the dominant positions of the field. These observations allow us to state that in the conflict between the priest and the parish, the conflict of two habituses is manifested, the carriers of which are, on the one hand, the priest, and on the other, the parishioners. The basis for updating the contradictions is the reduction of the distance, both physical and social, between the priest and the parish, as well as the fundamental impossibility of an effective transfer of capital between fields.Overcoming conflicts, we assume, may be associated with the restoration of social distance and the efforts of the priest to change mental structures, which should subsequently lead to a change in the habitus of parishioners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“明智的牧师”:宗教界的主导者
本文介绍了2019年至2022年在利佩茨克地区一个教区进行的一项研究的结果。该研究分两个阶段进行:第一阶段于2019年7月至8月进行,第二阶段于2022年7月至8月进行。本研究主要采用非纳入观察。在研究过程中,作者记录了观察日记。本文以D教区为例,对神父与教民互动的实践进行了研究、描述和分析。本研究的理论来源是P.布迪厄的著作。本文特别关注布迪厄的理论模型在宗教传统研究中的应用可能性。我们的研究结果表明,尽管没有一定的局限性,但我们选择的理论框架使我们能够看到和描述影响牧师和教区居民之间互动的未显现机制。D.的到来引起研究兴趣的一个特点是它的冲突程度相当高。在很长一段时间里,教区居民与所有被指派到这个教区的牧师发生了激烈而不妥协的冲突。不久以前,在任命a神父之后,情况发生了变化。新牧师设法与教区居民的到来建立了更平衡的关系,并阻止了教区居民的挑衅行为。牧师和教民之间的冲突可以从习惯、领域、资本和领域主导地位的等级来描述。通过这些观察,我们可以说,在牧师和教区之间的冲突中,体现了两种习惯的冲突,这两种习惯的载体一方面是牧师,另一方面是教区居民。矛盾更新的基础是牧师和教区之间物质和社会距离的减少,以及领域之间有效转移资本的根本不可能。我们认为,克服冲突可能与社会距离的恢复和牧师改变心理结构的努力有关,这将随后导致教区居民习惯的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Wise priest”: dominant agent in the religious field The global history of religion: back to the future? “The first experience of a civil memorial service”: the mourning morning at the Moscow art theatre 13 February 1910 The problem of personalism in linguophilosophy of revd. Pavel Florensky: modern receptions M. M. Tareev’s kenotic ecclesiology: an attempt at a reconstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1