Ambivalent Bias at Work: Managers’ Perceptions of Older Workers across Organizational Contexts

IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Work Employment and Society Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1177/09500170231175790
Hila Axelrad, Alexandra Kalev, Noah Lewin-Epstein
{"title":"Ambivalent Bias at Work: Managers’ Perceptions of Older Workers across Organizational Contexts","authors":"Hila Axelrad, Alexandra Kalev, Noah Lewin-Epstein","doi":"10.1177/09500170231175790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Managerial bias is a major source of workplace inequality and a central target of employer diversity efforts, yet we know little about the content of stereotypes and where they prevail. Stereotypes can be ambivalent, mixing negative and positive dimensions. Ambivalent stereotypes can rationalize discriminatory decision-making but they may also be more amenable to change. This article examines the prevalence of wholly negative and ambivalent age-based stereotypes across organizational contexts. Data on 551 managers reveals, first, that the modal manager holds ambivalent stereotypes about older workers, with positive perceptions of their personal attributes and negative perceptions regarding their employability. Second, both negative and ambivalent stereotypes are common in the presence of a labour union. Their prevalence declines, however, in different contexts: ambivalent stereotypes decline with increased intergroup contact and negative stereotypes decline when accountability triggers are implmented. Implications for research on work, organizations, older workers, and diversity management are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48187,"journal":{"name":"Work Employment and Society","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work Employment and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231175790","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managerial bias is a major source of workplace inequality and a central target of employer diversity efforts, yet we know little about the content of stereotypes and where they prevail. Stereotypes can be ambivalent, mixing negative and positive dimensions. Ambivalent stereotypes can rationalize discriminatory decision-making but they may also be more amenable to change. This article examines the prevalence of wholly negative and ambivalent age-based stereotypes across organizational contexts. Data on 551 managers reveals, first, that the modal manager holds ambivalent stereotypes about older workers, with positive perceptions of their personal attributes and negative perceptions regarding their employability. Second, both negative and ambivalent stereotypes are common in the presence of a labour union. Their prevalence declines, however, in different contexts: ambivalent stereotypes decline with increased intergroup contact and negative stereotypes decline when accountability triggers are implmented. Implications for research on work, organizations, older workers, and diversity management are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作中的矛盾偏见:跨组织背景下管理者对年长员工的看法
管理偏见是工作场所不平等的主要来源,也是雇主多元化努力的中心目标,但我们对刻板印象的内容以及它们普遍存在的地方知之甚少。刻板印象可能是矛盾的,混合了消极和积极的方面。矛盾的刻板印象可以使歧视性决策合理化,但它们也可能更容易改变。这篇文章考察了在组织环境中普遍存在的完全消极和矛盾的基于年龄的刻板印象。对551名管理者的数据显示,首先,模态管理者对年长员工持有矛盾的刻板印象,对他们的个人属性有积极的看法,对他们的就业能力有消极的看法。其次,在工会存在的情况下,消极和矛盾的刻板印象都很常见。然而,在不同的背景下,其患病率有所下降:矛盾刻板印象随着群体间接触的增加而下降,消极刻板印象随着问责触发器的实施而下降。讨论了对工作、组织、老年员工和多样性管理研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
13.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Work, Employment and Society (WES) is a leading international peer reviewed journal of the British Sociological Association which publishes theoretically informed and original research on the sociology of work. Work, Employment and Society covers all aspects of work, employment and unemployment and their connections with wider social processes and social structures. The journal is sociologically orientated but welcomes contributions from other disciplines which addresses the issues in a way that informs less debated aspects of the journal"s remit, such as unpaid labour and the informal economy.
期刊最新文献
Contesting Labour Violations in Uzbekistan’s Cotton Fields Book Review: Francesca Coin, The Great Resignation: The New Refusal of Work CoinFrancescaThe Great Resignation: The New Refusal of WorkLondon: Bloomsbury, 2025, £18 pbk, (ISBN: 9781350534360), 216 pp. Managing Stigma and Perpetuating Ableism: How Frontline Workers Navigate Disclosure When Encouraging Employers to Hire Disabled People Organising Beyond the Employment Relationship: Scaling Up and Institutional Power in Own-Account Unions Who You Know or What You Know? Job Search and Matching in the Presence of Network-Based Recruitment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1