Impact of steroid and lidocaine injection in the sacroiliac joint in axial spondyloarthritis patients: a randomized controlled trial

Q3 Medicine Revmatologiia (Bulgaria) Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.35465/31.2.2023.pp10-17
Ahmed Elsaman, Asmaa Khalifa, Sohir Mahrous, Medhat Ibraheem, Fatma Ali, Ahmed Radwan
{"title":"Impact of steroid and lidocaine injection in the sacroiliac joint in axial spondyloarthritis patients: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Ahmed Elsaman, Asmaa Khalifa, Sohir Mahrous, Medhat Ibraheem, Fatma Ali, Ahmed Radwan","doi":"10.35465/31.2.2023.pp10-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The value of steroid and lidocaine injection of the sacroiliac joint in axial spondyloarthritis patients on magnetic resonance imaging scores and clinical disease outcome measures is not yet well assessed.
 Patient and methods: Participants were randomly assigned into two groups; Group I received unilateral ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection with .5% lidocaine hydrochloride mixed with triamcinolone. At the same time, group II received subcutaneous saline injection. All participants fulfilled the ASAS criteria for axial SpA and all had bone marrow edema of at least one sacroiliac joint at baseline. Outcomes measures were: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scores. Participants were assessed at baseline (before and after sacroiliac joint injection) and after three months. This clinical trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT04895228.
 Results: In this study, a total of 61 participants were registered. There was a significant difference between both groups regarding pain, spine mobility, SPARCC, and ASDAS scores in favor of group I. Spine mobility showed the earliest improvement, followed by pain whilst SPARCC, and ASDAS scores showed improvement after three months. Higher disease activity, younger age, and shorter disease duration were all associated with better outcomes. Bilateral hip involvement was a predictor of poor response.
 Conclusion: Sacroiliac joint injection of lidocaine and triamcinolone in axial SpA patients is a cost-effective and practical technique for controlling pain, improving function, disease activity scores, and bone marrow edema with acceptable complications and relatively sustained effect.
","PeriodicalId":38954,"journal":{"name":"Revmatologiia (Bulgaria)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revmatologiia (Bulgaria)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35465/31.2.2023.pp10-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The value of steroid and lidocaine injection of the sacroiliac joint in axial spondyloarthritis patients on magnetic resonance imaging scores and clinical disease outcome measures is not yet well assessed. Patient and methods: Participants were randomly assigned into two groups; Group I received unilateral ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection with .5% lidocaine hydrochloride mixed with triamcinolone. At the same time, group II received subcutaneous saline injection. All participants fulfilled the ASAS criteria for axial SpA and all had bone marrow edema of at least one sacroiliac joint at baseline. Outcomes measures were: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scores. Participants were assessed at baseline (before and after sacroiliac joint injection) and after three months. This clinical trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT04895228. Results: In this study, a total of 61 participants were registered. There was a significant difference between both groups regarding pain, spine mobility, SPARCC, and ASDAS scores in favor of group I. Spine mobility showed the earliest improvement, followed by pain whilst SPARCC, and ASDAS scores showed improvement after three months. Higher disease activity, younger age, and shorter disease duration were all associated with better outcomes. Bilateral hip involvement was a predictor of poor response. Conclusion: Sacroiliac joint injection of lidocaine and triamcinolone in axial SpA patients is a cost-effective and practical technique for controlling pain, improving function, disease activity scores, and bone marrow edema with acceptable complications and relatively sustained effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注射类固醇和利多卡因对轴型脊柱炎患者骶髂关节的影响:一项随机对照试验
背景:骶髂关节注射类固醇和利多卡因对轴型脊柱性关节炎患者的磁共振成像评分和临床疾病结局指标的价值尚未得到很好的评估。 患者与方法:受试者随机分为两组;第一组患者在超声引导下单侧骶髂关节注射盐酸利多卡因0.5%混合曲安奈德。同时,第二组给予皮下生理盐水注射。所有参与者均满足ASAS轴向SpA标准,且基线时至少有一个骶髂关节骨髓水肿。结果测量为:视觉模拟量表(VAS)、强直性脊柱炎疾病活动评分(ASDAS)、巴斯强直性脊柱炎功能指数(BASFI)和加拿大脊柱炎研究联盟(SPARCC)评分。参与者在基线(骶髂关节注射前后)和三个月后进行评估。该临床试验已在clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT04895228. 结果:本研究共纳入61名受试者。两组在疼痛、脊柱活动度、SPARCC和ASDAS评分方面存在显著差异。第一组患者脊柱活动度改善最早,其次是疼痛,而SPARCC和ASDAS评分在三个月后改善。较高的疾病活动性、较年轻的年龄和较短的疾病持续时间都与较好的结果相关。双侧髋关节受累是不良反应的预测因子。 结论:骶髂关节注射利多卡因和曲安奈酮治疗轴向SpA患者是一种经济实用的技术,可控制疼痛、改善功能、疾病活动度评分和骨髓水肿,并发症可接受,效果相对持续;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revmatologiia (Bulgaria)
Revmatologiia (Bulgaria) Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Taxane-induced scleroderma-like skin changes – review of the literature and case report A case of SAPHO syndrome treated with zoledronic acid and hydroxychloroquine Efficacy of rituximab in difficult to treatment patients with polymyositis Necrotizing Raynaud's phenomenon after recurrent COVID-19 infection Capillaroscopy in COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1