The impact of political competition on low-carbon technology innovation: From the perspective of officials’ personal characteristics

IF 4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy & Environment Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1177/0958305x231205516
Yaling Deng, Jingjing Wang, De Xia, Lulu Xu
{"title":"The impact of political competition on low-carbon technology innovation: From the perspective of officials’ personal characteristics","authors":"Yaling Deng, Jingjing Wang, De Xia, Lulu Xu","doi":"10.1177/0958305x231205516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political competition is reflected in the strategic interaction of regional government's behavioral motivation driven by “official tournament.” Especially since environmental protection was officially included in the official performance appraisal system in 2005, the interactive trend of local governments’ economic development and environmental protection is more obvious. The policy uncertainty caused by this interaction is a major challenge for the government to promote regional sustainable development. Different from previous studies that only focus on the impact of political competition on environmental governance, this paper studies the impact of political competition on the low-carbon technology innovation from the perspective of sustainable development. Combined with the characteristics of Provincial Party Secretaries and Provincial Governors, the influence mechanism of political competition on low-carbon technology innovation is analyzed based on the method of spatial dubin model. Firstly, it finds that political competition has a significant negative impact on low-carbon technology innovation in the region and its adjacent regions, which is mainly caused by the political competition of Provincial Governors, while the political competition of Provincial Party Secretaries has no significant impact on low-carbon technology innovation. Secondly, the results of the mediation effect test show that reducing the intensity of environmental regulation in exchange for economic growth and political promotion opportunities is one of the reasons why the political competition of Provincial Governors inhibits low-carbon technology innovation. Thirdly, the results of the heterogeneity test of official characteristics show that the age of Provincial Governors is less and the tenure is longer, the stronger the inhibiting effect of Provincial Governors’ political competition on low-carbon technology innovation is. These conclusions provide policy suggestions for enterprises to make environmental investment decisions under different political environments.","PeriodicalId":11652,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231205516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political competition is reflected in the strategic interaction of regional government's behavioral motivation driven by “official tournament.” Especially since environmental protection was officially included in the official performance appraisal system in 2005, the interactive trend of local governments’ economic development and environmental protection is more obvious. The policy uncertainty caused by this interaction is a major challenge for the government to promote regional sustainable development. Different from previous studies that only focus on the impact of political competition on environmental governance, this paper studies the impact of political competition on the low-carbon technology innovation from the perspective of sustainable development. Combined with the characteristics of Provincial Party Secretaries and Provincial Governors, the influence mechanism of political competition on low-carbon technology innovation is analyzed based on the method of spatial dubin model. Firstly, it finds that political competition has a significant negative impact on low-carbon technology innovation in the region and its adjacent regions, which is mainly caused by the political competition of Provincial Governors, while the political competition of Provincial Party Secretaries has no significant impact on low-carbon technology innovation. Secondly, the results of the mediation effect test show that reducing the intensity of environmental regulation in exchange for economic growth and political promotion opportunities is one of the reasons why the political competition of Provincial Governors inhibits low-carbon technology innovation. Thirdly, the results of the heterogeneity test of official characteristics show that the age of Provincial Governors is less and the tenure is longer, the stronger the inhibiting effect of Provincial Governors’ political competition on low-carbon technology innovation is. These conclusions provide policy suggestions for enterprises to make environmental investment decisions under different political environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治竞争对低碳技术创新的影响:基于官员个人特征的视角
政治竞争表现为区域政府在“官赛”驱动下的行为动机的战略互动。特别是自2005年环境保护被正式纳入官方绩效考核体系以来,地方政府经济发展与环境保护的互动趋势更加明显。这种相互作用导致的政策不确定性是政府促进区域可持续发展的一个重大挑战。不同于以往的研究只关注政治竞争对环境治理的影响,本文从可持续发展的角度研究了政治竞争对低碳技术创新的影响。基于空间杜宾模型的方法,结合省委书记、省长的特点,分析了政治竞争对低碳技术创新的影响机制。首先,研究发现政治竞争对区域及相邻区域的低碳技术创新具有显著的负向影响,这主要是省长的政治竞争造成的,而省委书记的政治竞争对低碳技术创新没有显著的影响。其次,中介效应检验结果表明,降低环境监管强度以换取经济增长和政治晋升机会是省长政治竞争抑制低碳技术创新的原因之一。第三,官员特征异质性检验结果表明,省长年龄越小、任期越长,省长政治竞争对低碳技术创新的抑制作用越强。这些结论为企业在不同政治环境下进行环境投资决策提供了政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Environment
Energy & Environment ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Energy & Environment is an interdisciplinary journal inviting energy policy analysts, natural scientists and engineers, as well as lawyers and economists to contribute to mutual understanding and learning, believing that better communication between experts will enhance the quality of policy, advance social well-being and help to reduce conflict. The journal encourages dialogue between the social sciences as energy demand and supply are observed and analysed with reference to politics of policy-making and implementation. The rapidly evolving social and environmental impacts of energy supply, transport, production and use at all levels require contribution from many disciplines if policy is to be effective. In particular E & E invite contributions from the study of policy delivery, ultimately more important than policy formation. The geopolitics of energy are also important, as are the impacts of environmental regulations and advancing technologies on national and local politics, and even global energy politics. Energy & Environment is a forum for constructive, professional information sharing, as well as debate across disciplines and professions, including the financial sector. Mathematical articles are outside the scope of Energy & Environment. The broader policy implications of submitted research should be addressed and environmental implications, not just emission quantities, be discussed with reference to scientific assumptions. This applies especially to technical papers based on arguments suggested by other disciplines, funding bodies or directly by policy-makers.
期刊最新文献
A novel power conversion structure for grid-connected photovoltaic applications based on MLI and LeBlanc transformer using IRSA technique Causal relationship between globalization, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Vietnam using Wavelet analysis Factors affecting per capita ecological footprint in OECD countries: Evidence from machine learning techniques Can green finance effectively mitigate PM2.5 pollution? What role will green technological innovation play? The asymmetric and long-run effect of demand-based CO2 emissions productivity on production-based CO2 emissions in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1