Religion and National Identity in Central and Eastern European Countries: Persisting and Evolving Links

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES East European Politics and Societies Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1177/08883254231203331
Simona Guglielmi, Arianna Piacentini
{"title":"Religion and National Identity in Central and Eastern European Countries: Persisting and Evolving Links","authors":"Simona Guglielmi, Arianna Piacentini","doi":"10.1177/08883254231203331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to offer a contribution to a better understanding of the mechanisms underpinning the intertwining of national and religious identity at the individual level in (some) European former communist and socialist countries. It starts by retracing from a historical perspective the place religion occupied during the regimes, then paying attention to how, once politicized and ethnicized by the hand of a new class of ethnopolitical entrepreneurs, religion has become “the hallmark of nationhood.” This excursus allows us to better contextualize both the theoretical argument and findings. The intertwining of national and religious identity is investigated from two main theoretical sources. The first is the debate within sociology and political science on the different ideas of nationhood, while the second consists of socio-psychological models of intergroup relations. The empirical investigation is based on survey data from the European values study (EVS, 2017). A comparative approach is used which includes four countries having Catholic large majorities (Poland, Slovenia, Croatia, and Hungary) and, as a benchmark, Romania having an Orthodox majority. To test the hypotheses, a structural equation model is specified. The causal model seeks to unravel to what extent different conceptions of nationhood (ethno-religious vs. civil), together with national attachment, influence the intergenerational transmission of religious values and distrust of people of another religion/nationality. The research results are in line with the current European trends pointing in the direction of a stronger overlap between the religious and the national in tailoring collective identities.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"26 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics and Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254231203331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article aims to offer a contribution to a better understanding of the mechanisms underpinning the intertwining of national and religious identity at the individual level in (some) European former communist and socialist countries. It starts by retracing from a historical perspective the place religion occupied during the regimes, then paying attention to how, once politicized and ethnicized by the hand of a new class of ethnopolitical entrepreneurs, religion has become “the hallmark of nationhood.” This excursus allows us to better contextualize both the theoretical argument and findings. The intertwining of national and religious identity is investigated from two main theoretical sources. The first is the debate within sociology and political science on the different ideas of nationhood, while the second consists of socio-psychological models of intergroup relations. The empirical investigation is based on survey data from the European values study (EVS, 2017). A comparative approach is used which includes four countries having Catholic large majorities (Poland, Slovenia, Croatia, and Hungary) and, as a benchmark, Romania having an Orthodox majority. To test the hypotheses, a structural equation model is specified. The causal model seeks to unravel to what extent different conceptions of nationhood (ethno-religious vs. civil), together with national attachment, influence the intergenerational transmission of religious values and distrust of people of another religion/nationality. The research results are in line with the current European trends pointing in the direction of a stronger overlap between the religious and the national in tailoring collective identities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中欧和东欧国家的宗教和民族认同:持续和演变的联系
本文旨在为更好地理解(一些)欧洲前共产主义和社会主义国家在个人层面上支撑民族和宗教身份交织的机制做出贡献。它首先从历史的角度追溯宗教在政权期间所占据的地位,然后关注宗教如何在一个新的民族政治企业家阶级的手中被政治化和民族化,成为“国家的标志”。这段短途旅行使我们能够更好地将理论论点和发现置于背景中。民族认同与宗教认同的交织从两个主要的理论来源进行研究。第一个是社会学和政治学内部关于不同国家概念的辩论,第二个是群体间关系的社会心理学模型。实证调查基于欧洲价值观研究(EVS, 2017)的调查数据。采用比较方法,包括四个天主教占多数的国家(波兰、斯洛文尼亚、克罗地亚和匈牙利),以及东正教占多数的罗马尼亚作为基准。为了检验这些假设,我们指定了一个结构方程模型。因果模型试图揭示不同的国家概念(民族-宗教vs.公民)以及国家依恋在多大程度上影响宗教价值观的代际传递和对另一宗教/国籍的人的不信任。研究结果与欧洲当前的趋势一致,即宗教与国家在塑造集体身份方面的重叠程度越来越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: East European Politics and Societies is an international journal that examines social, political, and economic issues in Eastern Europe. EEPS offers holistic coverage of the region - every country, from every discipline - ranging from detailed case studies through comparative analyses and theoretical issues. Contributors include not only western scholars but many from Eastern Europe itself. The Editorial Board is composed of a world-class panel of historians, political scientists, economists, and social scientists.
期刊最新文献
Platens from the Past: Yugonostalgia and the UNIS-tbm Typewriter Neo-Feudalism and Neo-Traditionalism as Responses to Liberalism Expelled from the Fairytale: The Impact of the Dissident Legacy on Post-1989 Central European Politics Post-Dissident Politics and the “Liberal Consensus” in East-Central Europe after 1989 Václav Havel Posthumous Reclamation of a National Hero?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1