Reading Foreskin Quarterly: Aesthetics as Argument Against Circumcision

Q1 Social Sciences The Journal of Men's Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1177/10608265231207399
Jonathan A. Allan
{"title":"Reading <i>Foreskin Quarterly</i>: Aesthetics as Argument Against Circumcision","authors":"Jonathan A. Allan","doi":"10.1177/10608265231207399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I set out to study Foreskin Quarterly, which was the Official Publication of the Uncircumcised Society of America (USA). Over the course of its history, it changed editorial hands and publishers hands several times, and with each change the magazine shifted direction that influenced and affected its original goals of foreskin activism. I argue that this magazine braided together pornography and activism in a way that was novel and important because in arguing against circumcision, it also sought to reclaim and eroticize the foreskin in a culture where the foreskin was anomalous and rare. Unfortunately, this magazine has largely gone unread by scholars, not just of pornography, but also of circumcision, and men’s bodies more generally. This article, thus, contributes to a growing body of scholarship on anti-circumcision activism, while also arguing for the importance of pornography in that activist milieu.","PeriodicalId":22686,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Men's Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Men's Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10608265231207399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, I set out to study Foreskin Quarterly, which was the Official Publication of the Uncircumcised Society of America (USA). Over the course of its history, it changed editorial hands and publishers hands several times, and with each change the magazine shifted direction that influenced and affected its original goals of foreskin activism. I argue that this magazine braided together pornography and activism in a way that was novel and important because in arguing against circumcision, it also sought to reclaim and eroticize the foreskin in a culture where the foreskin was anomalous and rare. Unfortunately, this magazine has largely gone unread by scholars, not just of pornography, but also of circumcision, and men’s bodies more generally. This article, thus, contributes to a growing body of scholarship on anti-circumcision activism, while also arguing for the importance of pornography in that activist milieu.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读包皮季刊:美学作为反对割礼的论据
在这篇文章中,我开始研究《包皮季刊》,这是美国未割包皮协会的官方出版物。在它的历史过程中,它的编辑和出版商几次易手,每一次改变,杂志都改变了方向,影响和影响了它最初的包皮运动目标。我认为,这本杂志以一种新颖而重要的方式将色情和激进主义结合在一起,因为在反对包皮环切术的同时,它也试图在包皮异常而罕见的文化中重新获得包皮并使其色情化。不幸的是,这本杂志在很大程度上没有被学者们阅读,不仅是色情,还有割礼,以及更广泛的男性身体。因此,这篇文章为反割礼活动的学术研究做出了贡献,同时也论证了色情在活动环境中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Men's Studies
The Journal of Men's Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Male Victims’ Acknowledgement of Sexual Assault and Their Help-Seeking Process. A Qualitative Study Negotiating Non-normative Identities: Gender Nonconforming Malaysian Muslims on Instagram “Show Them Who You Are!”: Ritual Combat and Masculine Identities in Ryan Coogler’s Black Panther Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Among Refugee Men: Prevalence and Correlates With Associated Factors The Relationship Between Masculinity and Help-Seeking Among Australian Men Living in Non-urban Areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1