{"title":"Faces of ‘not knowing’ in International Relations","authors":"J. Marshall Beier","doi":"10.1080/10357718.2023.2268030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThat Indigenous diplomacies remain largely unknown to states and to disciplinary International Relations is, ultimately, a matter of choices made by those privileged in terms of the power to (re)produce social facts and common senses. Distinguishing distinct faces of ‘not knowing’ exposes ontological commitments underwriting the logics of territorially exclusive sovereign power and the knowledge practices of International Relations that, in both spheres, make Indigenous ways of knowing and being in the world seem implausible. ‘Not knowing’ in this sense is a form of rejection of knowledge and, therefore, a consequential practice which, as such, is never politically innocent. Relational autonomy raises a challenge to the rigid singularism and exclusivity of dominant ontologies—one that is rooted in long-run historical experiences of still-existing Indigenous forms of community and inter-national diplomatic practice. Among other things, it points us to more sustainable possibilities upon which to found relations between polities and reminds us that diplomacies are always plural.KEYWORDS: Relational autonomyIndigenous diplomaciesInternational Relationsknowingnot knowing Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJ. Marshall BeierJ. Marshall Beier is Professor of Political Science at McMaster University and Editor-in-Chief of the journal Critical Studies on Security. His current research examines issues of Indigenous peoples’ global diplomacies, children’s rights, and imagined childhood as a technology of global governance. His publications include International Relations in Uncommon Places: Indigeneity, Cosmology, and the Limits of International Theory (2005, 2009), Indigenous Diplomacies, ed. (2009), Discovering Childhood in International Relations, ed. (2020), and, with Helen Berents, Children, Childhoods, and Global Politics, eds. (2023). His work has appeared in journals including Children’s Geographies, Contemporary Security Policy, Cooperation and Conflict, Global Governance, Global Responsibility to Protect, International Political Sociology, International Politics, International Studies Review, Journal of Human Rights, Security Dialogue, and Third World Quarterly.","PeriodicalId":51708,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of International Affairs","volume":"78 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2023.2268030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
ABSTRACTThat Indigenous diplomacies remain largely unknown to states and to disciplinary International Relations is, ultimately, a matter of choices made by those privileged in terms of the power to (re)produce social facts and common senses. Distinguishing distinct faces of ‘not knowing’ exposes ontological commitments underwriting the logics of territorially exclusive sovereign power and the knowledge practices of International Relations that, in both spheres, make Indigenous ways of knowing and being in the world seem implausible. ‘Not knowing’ in this sense is a form of rejection of knowledge and, therefore, a consequential practice which, as such, is never politically innocent. Relational autonomy raises a challenge to the rigid singularism and exclusivity of dominant ontologies—one that is rooted in long-run historical experiences of still-existing Indigenous forms of community and inter-national diplomatic practice. Among other things, it points us to more sustainable possibilities upon which to found relations between polities and reminds us that diplomacies are always plural.KEYWORDS: Relational autonomyIndigenous diplomaciesInternational Relationsknowingnot knowing Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJ. Marshall BeierJ. Marshall Beier is Professor of Political Science at McMaster University and Editor-in-Chief of the journal Critical Studies on Security. His current research examines issues of Indigenous peoples’ global diplomacies, children’s rights, and imagined childhood as a technology of global governance. His publications include International Relations in Uncommon Places: Indigeneity, Cosmology, and the Limits of International Theory (2005, 2009), Indigenous Diplomacies, ed. (2009), Discovering Childhood in International Relations, ed. (2020), and, with Helen Berents, Children, Childhoods, and Global Politics, eds. (2023). His work has appeared in journals including Children’s Geographies, Contemporary Security Policy, Cooperation and Conflict, Global Governance, Global Responsibility to Protect, International Political Sociology, International Politics, International Studies Review, Journal of Human Rights, Security Dialogue, and Third World Quarterly.
期刊介绍:
AJIA is the journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs. The Institute was established in 1933 as an independent and non-political body and its purpose is to stimulate interest in and understanding of international affairs among its members and the general public. The aim of the Australian Journal of International Affairs is to publish high quality scholarly research on international political, social, economic and legal issues, especially (but not exclusively) within the Asia-Pacific region. The journal publishes research articles, refereed review essays and commentary and provocation pieces. ''Articles'' are traditional scholarly articles. ‘Review essays’ use newly published books as the basis to thematically examine current events in International Relations. The journal also publishes commentaries and provocations which are high quality and engaging pieces of commentary, opinion and provocation in a variety of styles. The Australian Journal of International Affairs aims to analyse international issues for an Australian readership and to present Australian perspectives to readers in other countries. While seeking to stimulate interest in and understanding of international affairs, the journal does not seek to promote any particular policies or approaches. All suitable manuscripts submitted are sent to two referees in a full ''double blind'' refereeing process.