Transmission prevention behaviors in US households with SARS-CoV-2 cases in 2020

Rebecca J. Rubinstein, Wenwen Mei, Caitlin A. Cassidy, Gabrielle Streeter, Christopher Basham, Carla Cerami, Feng-Chang Lin, Jessica T. Lin, Katie R. Mollan
{"title":"Transmission prevention behaviors in US households with SARS-CoV-2 cases in 2020","authors":"Rebecca J. Rubinstein, Wenwen Mei, Caitlin A. Cassidy, Gabrielle Streeter, Christopher Basham, Carla Cerami, Feng-Chang Lin, Jessica T. Lin, Katie R. Mollan","doi":"10.3389/fepid.2023.1160214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission frequently occurs within households, yet few studies describe which household contacts and household units are most likely to engage in transmission-interrupting behaviors. Methods We analyzed a COVID-19 prospective household transmission cohort in North Carolina (April to October 2020) to quantify changes in physical distancing behaviors among household contacts over 14 days. We evaluated which household contacts were most likely to ever mask at home and to ever share a bedroom with the index case between days 7–14. Results In the presence of a household COVID-19 infection, 24% of household contacts reported ever masking at home during the week before study entry. Masking in the home between days 7–14 was reported by 26% of household contacts and was more likely for participants who observed their household index case wearing a mask. Participants of color and participants in high-density households were more likely to mask at home. After adjusting for race/ethnicity, living density was not as clearly associated with masking. Symptomatic household contacts were more likely to share a bedroom with the index case. Working individuals and those with comorbidities avoided sharing a bedroom with the index case. Discussion In-home masking during household exposure to COVID-19 was infrequent in 2020. In light of the ongoing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, these findings underscore a need for health campaigns to increase the feasibility and social desirability of in-home masking among exposed household members. Joint messaging on social responsibility and prevention of breakthrough infections, reinfections, and long COVID-19 may help motivate transmission-interruption behaviors.","PeriodicalId":73083,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in epidemiology","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2023.1160214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission frequently occurs within households, yet few studies describe which household contacts and household units are most likely to engage in transmission-interrupting behaviors. Methods We analyzed a COVID-19 prospective household transmission cohort in North Carolina (April to October 2020) to quantify changes in physical distancing behaviors among household contacts over 14 days. We evaluated which household contacts were most likely to ever mask at home and to ever share a bedroom with the index case between days 7–14. Results In the presence of a household COVID-19 infection, 24% of household contacts reported ever masking at home during the week before study entry. Masking in the home between days 7–14 was reported by 26% of household contacts and was more likely for participants who observed their household index case wearing a mask. Participants of color and participants in high-density households were more likely to mask at home. After adjusting for race/ethnicity, living density was not as clearly associated with masking. Symptomatic household contacts were more likely to share a bedroom with the index case. Working individuals and those with comorbidities avoided sharing a bedroom with the index case. Discussion In-home masking during household exposure to COVID-19 was infrequent in 2020. In light of the ongoing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, these findings underscore a need for health campaigns to increase the feasibility and social desirability of in-home masking among exposed household members. Joint messaging on social responsibility and prevention of breakthrough infections, reinfections, and long COVID-19 may help motivate transmission-interruption behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2020年美国SARS-CoV-2病例家庭的传播预防行为
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)的传播经常发生在家庭内部,但很少有研究描述哪些家庭接触者和家庭单位最有可能参与阻断传播的行为。方法分析2020年4月至10月在北卡罗来纳州进行的COVID-19前瞻性家庭传播队列,量化14天内家庭接触者之间身体距离行为的变化。我们评估了哪些家庭接触者最有可能在家中戴口罩,并在第7-14天期间与指示病例共用一间卧室。结果在存在家庭COVID-19感染的情况下,24%的家庭接触者报告在进入研究前一周曾在家中戴口罩。26%的家庭接触者报告在7-14天期间在家中戴口罩,而观察到其家庭指数病例的参与者更有可能戴口罩。有色人种和人口密集家庭的参与者更有可能在家里戴口罩。在对种族/民族进行调整后,居住密度与掩蔽的关系并不明显。有症状的家庭接触者更有可能与指示病例共用一间卧室。工作人员和那些有合并症的人避免与指示病例共用一间卧室。2020年,家庭暴露于COVID-19期间的家庭口罩并不常见。鉴于SARS-CoV-2的持续传播,这些发现强调需要开展卫生运动,以提高暴露家庭成员在家中戴口罩的可行性和社会可取性。关于社会责任和预防突破性感染、再感染和长期COVID-19的联合信息可能有助于激励传播中断行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of cognitive bias about infectious diseases on social well-being. The spatio-temporal evolution of leishmaniasis in the province of Essaouira. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and associated factors among adult diabetic patients: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Using a computational cognitive model to simulate the effects of personal and social network experiences on seasonal influenza vaccination decisions. Prevalence of occupational injuries and associated factors among solid waste collectors in Jigjiga city, eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1