Collaborative clinical trials on infectious disease among the G20 nations using scientometric analysis

Sanjay Pattanshetty, ViolaSavy Dsouza, JestinaRachel Kurian, K Cauvery, Lada Leyens, Helmut Brand
{"title":"Collaborative clinical trials on infectious disease among the G20 nations using scientometric analysis","authors":"Sanjay Pattanshetty, ViolaSavy Dsouza, JestinaRachel Kurian, K Cauvery, Lada Leyens, Helmut Brand","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_242_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Increased international travel and trade, changes in lifestyle, microbial resistance, and climate change, which allow endemics to proliferate, all contribute to the accelerated spread of infectious diseases (IDs). It is crucial to collaborate through shared knowledge and skills to combat these risks. Prioritizing clinical trials in infectious disease (CTI) in a cooperative and multipronged manner is essential to the successful elimination of threats.[1] Building a strong research and innovation ecosystem is one of the important agendas of the G20 presidency in responding to these global crises (e.g., Ebola and Zika).[2] India gears up for its 2023 G20 presidency, as the global economy teeters on the brink of recession as it recovers from the grip of COVID-19.[3] At this juncture, it is beneficial to obtain a macroscopic overview of the state of collaboration between G20 nations in CTI research. METHODOLOGY Studies published by G20-affiliated authors between 2010 and 2022 were retrieved from PubMed and the Web of Science using relevant search strategies. After data cleaning using thesaurus file, we eliminated duplicates and categorized the collectively represented European Union (EU) member states as “EU” except France, Germany, and Italy, as they are individually represented in G20. The final dataset was used for bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer consisted of metadata of articles extracted from the Web of Science.[4] Coauthorship and co-occurrence analysis was performed as a component of bibliometric analysis. RESULTS Three thousand six hundred and thirty-six articles were included in the study. Between 2013 and 2014, the number of publications with international collaborations increased by 5.8%. The United States of America (USA) had the most publications among the G20 nations (28.2%), followed by the United Kingdom (UK) (10.3%) and Germany at 6.2%. India is ranked 13, accounting for 2.4% of all publications. The use of keywords such as HIV/AIDS, COVID-19, hepatitis, and influenza are relatively frequent. India has collaborated with G20 nations on over 203 clinical trials from 2010 to 2022. India has collaborated closely with the USA, followed by the UK and Australia. DISCUSSION According to the key findings of our study, most clinical trials undertaken in partnership with G20 countries are the USA, the UK, and Germany. Industrialized nations are dominating publications likely as a result of relative research funding capacity and the English proficiency advantage. Rethinking of funding policies in health research to direct and incentivize institutions and researchers can improve.[5] Viral infections such as HIV/AIDS, COVID-19, and hepatitis are frequently occurring keywords indicating that research on these fields is attracting international collaborations. With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a sharp increase-related research focused on preventing and containing such a pandemic.[6] COVID-19-driven resurgence of these diseases needs to be met with appropriate political will for cooperation and collaboration.[7] In recent times, strategies are being devised to encourage Lower middle income countries (LMICs) to achieve their publication potential, but the changes are not keeping in pace with the need to prevent and control high-burden infections.[8] This study provides policymakers and stakeholders with a macro perspective of collaborative clinical trials to enhance future research to address ID threats. Future research on collaboration can focus on facilitators and impediments to collaboration. This requires global leadership through cooperative entities like the G20. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_242_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Increased international travel and trade, changes in lifestyle, microbial resistance, and climate change, which allow endemics to proliferate, all contribute to the accelerated spread of infectious diseases (IDs). It is crucial to collaborate through shared knowledge and skills to combat these risks. Prioritizing clinical trials in infectious disease (CTI) in a cooperative and multipronged manner is essential to the successful elimination of threats.[1] Building a strong research and innovation ecosystem is one of the important agendas of the G20 presidency in responding to these global crises (e.g., Ebola and Zika).[2] India gears up for its 2023 G20 presidency, as the global economy teeters on the brink of recession as it recovers from the grip of COVID-19.[3] At this juncture, it is beneficial to obtain a macroscopic overview of the state of collaboration between G20 nations in CTI research. METHODOLOGY Studies published by G20-affiliated authors between 2010 and 2022 were retrieved from PubMed and the Web of Science using relevant search strategies. After data cleaning using thesaurus file, we eliminated duplicates and categorized the collectively represented European Union (EU) member states as “EU” except France, Germany, and Italy, as they are individually represented in G20. The final dataset was used for bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer consisted of metadata of articles extracted from the Web of Science.[4] Coauthorship and co-occurrence analysis was performed as a component of bibliometric analysis. RESULTS Three thousand six hundred and thirty-six articles were included in the study. Between 2013 and 2014, the number of publications with international collaborations increased by 5.8%. The United States of America (USA) had the most publications among the G20 nations (28.2%), followed by the United Kingdom (UK) (10.3%) and Germany at 6.2%. India is ranked 13, accounting for 2.4% of all publications. The use of keywords such as HIV/AIDS, COVID-19, hepatitis, and influenza are relatively frequent. India has collaborated with G20 nations on over 203 clinical trials from 2010 to 2022. India has collaborated closely with the USA, followed by the UK and Australia. DISCUSSION According to the key findings of our study, most clinical trials undertaken in partnership with G20 countries are the USA, the UK, and Germany. Industrialized nations are dominating publications likely as a result of relative research funding capacity and the English proficiency advantage. Rethinking of funding policies in health research to direct and incentivize institutions and researchers can improve.[5] Viral infections such as HIV/AIDS, COVID-19, and hepatitis are frequently occurring keywords indicating that research on these fields is attracting international collaborations. With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a sharp increase-related research focused on preventing and containing such a pandemic.[6] COVID-19-driven resurgence of these diseases needs to be met with appropriate political will for cooperation and collaboration.[7] In recent times, strategies are being devised to encourage Lower middle income countries (LMICs) to achieve their publication potential, but the changes are not keeping in pace with the need to prevent and control high-burden infections.[8] This study provides policymakers and stakeholders with a macro perspective of collaborative clinical trials to enhance future research to address ID threats. Future research on collaboration can focus on facilitators and impediments to collaboration. This requires global leadership through cooperative entities like the G20. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二十国集团国家间使用科学计量分析的传染病合作临床试验
国际旅行和贸易的增加、生活方式的改变、微生物耐药性和气候变化使地方病得以扩散,所有这些都促进了传染病的加速传播。通过共享知识和技能开展合作,抗击这些风险至关重要。以合作和多管齐下的方式确定传染病临床试验的优先顺序对于成功消除威胁至关重要。[1]建立一个强大的研究和创新生态系统是G20主席国应对这些全球危机(如埃博拉和寨卡病毒)的重要议程之一。[2]印度为2023年G20轮值主席国做准备,目前全球经济正从COVID-19的控制中复苏,处于衰退的边缘。[3]在这个关键时刻,对G20国家在CTI研究中的合作状况有一个宏观的概述是有益的。方法使用相关搜索策略从PubMed和Web of Science检索2010年至2022年间g20成员作者发表的研究。在使用同义词库文件进行数据清理后,我们消除了重复项,并将除法国、德国和意大利以外的欧盟(EU)成员国分类为“EU”,因为它们分别在G20中表示。最终数据集使用VOSviewer进行文献计量分析,该数据集由从Web of Science提取的文章元数据组成。[4]合著和共现分析作为文献计量学分析的一个组成部分。结果共纳入33636篇文献。2013年至2014年,国际合作的出版物数量增长了5.8%。美利坚合众国(USA)在G20国家中拥有最多的出版物(28.2%),其次是英国(UK)(10.3%)和德国(6.2%)。印度排名第13位,占所有出版物的2.4%。HIV/AIDS、COVID-19、肝炎、流感等关键词的使用频率相对较高。从2010年到2022年,印度与G20国家合作进行了203多项临床试验。印度与美国密切合作,其次是英国和澳大利亚。根据我们研究的主要发现,与G20国家合作开展的大多数临床试验是美国、英国和德国。工业化国家在出版物中占据主导地位,可能是由于相对的研究资金能力和英语熟练程度优势。重新思考卫生研究的资助政策,以指导和激励机构和研究人员可以改善。[5]艾滋病、COVID-19、肝炎等病毒感染是频繁出现的关键词,表明这些领域的研究正在吸引国际合作。随着COVID-19大流行的出现,有关预防和遏制这一大流行的相关研究急剧增加。[6]应对由covid -19导致的这些疾病死灰复燃,需要有适当的政治意愿,开展合作与协作。[7]最近,正在制定战略以鼓励中低收入国家(LMICs)实现其出版潜力,但这些变化没有跟上预防和控制高负担感染的需要。[8]本研究为政策制定者和利益相关者提供了合作临床试验的宏观视角,以加强未来应对ID威胁的研究。未来对协作的研究可以集中在协作的促进因素和障碍上。这需要通过G20等合作实体发挥全球领导作用。财政支持及赞助无。利益冲突没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Clinical Research
Perspectives in Clinical Research Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer review quarterly journal is positioned to build a learning clinical research community in India. This scientific journal will have a broad coverage of topics across clinical research disciplines including clinical research methodology, research ethics, clinical data management, training, data management, biostatistics, regulatory and will include original articles, reviews, news and views, perspectives, and other interesting sections. PICR will offer all clinical research stakeholders in India – academicians, ethics committees, regulators, and industry professionals -a forum for exchange of ideas, information and opinions.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of student-led “Association for Support and Propagation of Innovation, Research, and Education” (A.S.P.I.R.E) in empowering undergraduate medical students in research: A 2-year longitudinal study Pleiotropic effect of teneligliptin versus glimepiride add-on therapy on hs-CRP and cardiorenal parameters in Indian type 2 diabetes patients: An open-labeled randomized controlled trial Efficacy and safety of quick penetrating solution heparin, quick penetrating solution diclofenac, and heparin gel in the prevention of infusion-associated superficial thrombophlebitis: A randomized controlled trial Bio-entrepreneurs’ bugbear: Regulatory rigmarole Experience of participating in community-based clinical trials from rural Maharashtra: Analysis of over 4000 participant feedback forms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1