首页 > 最新文献

Perspectives in Clinical Research最新文献

英文 中文
Evaluation of student-led “Association for Support and Propagation of Innovation, Research, and Education” (A.S.P.I.R.E) in empowering undergraduate medical students in research: A 2-year longitudinal study 评估学生领导的 "创新、研究和教育支持与传播协会"(A.S.P.I.R.E)在增强本科医学生研究能力方面的作用:为期两年的纵向研究
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_25_24
Shirish Rao, Yashika Yagade, Amey Ambike, Aarya Desai, Amey Kundawar, Alhad Mulkalwar, Munira Hirkani, Raakhi Tripathi
{"title":"Evaluation of student-led “Association for Support and Propagation of Innovation, Research, and Education” (A.S.P.I.R.E) in empowering undergraduate medical students in research: A 2-year longitudinal study","authors":"Shirish Rao, Yashika Yagade, Amey Ambike, Aarya Desai, Amey Kundawar, Alhad Mulkalwar, Munira Hirkani, Raakhi Tripathi","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_25_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_25_24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141823787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and safety of quick penetrating solution heparin, quick penetrating solution diclofenac, and heparin gel in the prevention of infusion-associated superficial thrombophlebitis: A randomized controlled trial 肝素快速渗透溶液、双氯芬酸快速渗透溶液和肝素凝胶在预防输液相关性浅表血栓性静脉炎方面的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_305_23
Vijeta Bajpai, Tejas K. Patel, Priyanka Dwivedi, Ankita Kabi, Yashpal Singh, Richa Agarwal, Ravi Gupta, Surekha Kishore
The present study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of quick penetrating solution (QPS) heparin, QPS diclofenac, and heparin gel in the prevention of superficial thrombophlebitis (ST). This randomized controlled trial was conducted after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee and registration to Clinical Trial Registry of India. Patients of 18–60 years age, American Society of Anesthesiologists I/II, and who needed venous cannulation for at least 72 h were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into three groups receiving study drugs (heparin gel, QPS heparin, and QPS diclofenac) every 8 hourly for a period of 72 h. Venous cannulation site was graded using the Visual Infusion Phlebitis Scale. Patients developing no ST, mean time to reach ST Grade 1 and 2, prevention of ST probability, and cost-effectiveness of interventions during the study period were assessed. Out of 219 included patients, development of no ST in the study groups at 72 h of treatment were heparin gel (11%), QPS heparin (9.6%), and QPS diclofenac (2.7%). The mean time (hours) to develop any grade ST in the study arms was heparin gel (36.2 [11.9]), QPS heparin (40.0 [13.4]), and QPS diclofenac (37.0 [13.2]). The Kaplan–Meier analysis did not reveal significant differences for the prevention of any grade ST or severe ST in three treatment arms. The average cost-effectiveness ratio for preventing thrombophlebitis was 14.2 in heparin gel-, 13.2 in QPS heparin-, and 95.6 in QPS diclofenac-treated patients. Based on efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, heparin gel or QPS heparin can be used to prevent ST due to intravenous cannulation in surgical patients. QPS diclofenac is not a cost-effective option to prevent ST.
本研究旨在比较肝素快速渗透溶液(QPS)、肝素快速渗透溶液双氯芬酸和肝素凝胶在预防浅表血栓性静脉炎(ST)方面的疗效、安全性和成本效益。 这项随机对照试验是在获得机构伦理委员会批准并在印度临床试验登记处登记后进行的。研究对象包括年龄在 18-60 岁之间、美国麻醉医师协会 I/II 级、需要静脉插管至少 72 小时的患者。患者被随机分为三组,在 72 小时内每 8 小时接受一次研究药物(肝素凝胶、QPS 肝素和 QPS 双氯芬酸)。对研究期间未发生 ST 的患者、达到 ST 1 级和 2 级的平均时间、ST 概率的预防以及干预措施的成本效益进行了评估。 在纳入的 219 名患者中,治疗 72 小时后未出现 ST 的研究组分别为肝素凝胶组(11%)、QPS 肝素组(9.6%)和 QPS 双氯芬酸组(2.7%)。肝素凝胶(36.2 [11.9])、QPS 肝素(40.0 [13.4])和 QPS 双氯芬酸(37.0 [13.2])治疗组出现任何等级 ST 的平均时间(小时)为 36.2 [11.9],QPS 肝素(40.0 [13.4])和 QPS 双氯芬酸(37.0 [13.2])。卡普兰-梅耶分析显示,三种治疗组在预防任何等级 ST 或严重 ST 方面没有显著差异。肝素凝胶治疗患者预防血栓性静脉炎的平均成本效益比为 14.2,QPS 肝素治疗患者为 13.2,QPS 双氯芬酸治疗患者为 95.6。 根据疗效、安全性和成本效益,肝素凝胶或 QPS 肝素可用于预防手术患者因静脉插管导致的 ST。QPS 双氯芬酸不是一种具有成本效益的预防 ST 的选择。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of quick penetrating solution heparin, quick penetrating solution diclofenac, and heparin gel in the prevention of infusion-associated superficial thrombophlebitis: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Vijeta Bajpai, Tejas K. Patel, Priyanka Dwivedi, Ankita Kabi, Yashpal Singh, Richa Agarwal, Ravi Gupta, Surekha Kishore","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_305_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_305_23","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 The present study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of quick penetrating solution (QPS) heparin, QPS diclofenac, and heparin gel in the prevention of superficial thrombophlebitis (ST).\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 This randomized controlled trial was conducted after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee and registration to Clinical Trial Registry of India. Patients of 18–60 years age, American Society of Anesthesiologists I/II, and who needed venous cannulation for at least 72 h were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into three groups receiving study drugs (heparin gel, QPS heparin, and QPS diclofenac) every 8 hourly for a period of 72 h. Venous cannulation site was graded using the Visual Infusion Phlebitis Scale. Patients developing no ST, mean time to reach ST Grade 1 and 2, prevention of ST probability, and cost-effectiveness of interventions during the study period were assessed.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Out of 219 included patients, development of no ST in the study groups at 72 h of treatment were heparin gel (11%), QPS heparin (9.6%), and QPS diclofenac (2.7%). The mean time (hours) to develop any grade ST in the study arms was heparin gel (36.2 [11.9]), QPS heparin (40.0 [13.4]), and QPS diclofenac (37.0 [13.2]). The Kaplan–Meier analysis did not reveal significant differences for the prevention of any grade ST or severe ST in three treatment arms. The average cost-effectiveness ratio for preventing thrombophlebitis was 14.2 in heparin gel-, 13.2 in QPS heparin-, and 95.6 in QPS diclofenac-treated patients.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Based on efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, heparin gel or QPS heparin can be used to prevent ST due to intravenous cannulation in surgical patients. QPS diclofenac is not a cost-effective option to prevent ST.\u0000","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141661090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pleiotropic effect of teneligliptin versus glimepiride add-on therapy on hs-CRP and cardiorenal parameters in Indian type 2 diabetes patients: An open-labeled randomized controlled trial 替尼利汀与格列美脲附加疗法对印度 2 型糖尿病患者 hs-CRP 和心肾功能参数的多重影响:一项开放标签随机对照试验
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_265_23
M. Kanimozhi, Manisha Bisht, Ravikant, Arkapal Bandyopadhyay, Manisha Naithani, S. Handu
The objective of the study was to estimate the pleiotropic effect of teneligliptin on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels and some cardiorenal parameters in comparison to glimepiride, both as add-on therapy to metformin. This 12-week open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial was conducted among Indian people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and on metformin monotherapy with poor glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin >7% or 53 mmol/mol). The endpoints were mean change in hs-CRP levels, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), serum creatinine, blood urea, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and change in cardiovascular (CV) risk categories from baseline to end of 12 weeks. Seventy participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either teneligliptin 20 mg once daily (n = 35) or glimepiride 1 mg twice daily (BD) (n = 35) as an add-on to metformin 500 mg BD. The mean age of the participants was 50.65 and 50.7 years in arms 1 and 2, respectively. At 12-weeks end, teneligliptin add-on caused a statistically significant reduction in hs-CRP compared to glimepiride in both per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) sets. No significant difference was observed for changes in SBP and DBP, creatinine, urea, eGFR levels, and CV risk category in both PP and ITT sets. Teneligliptin add-on resulted in favorable effects on hs-CRP levels and comparable effects on cardiorenal parameters compared to glimepiride add-on therapy at 12-weeks end. This trial has been prospectively registered in CTRI (Clinical Trials Registry of India). Registration number: CTRI/2021/08/035342.
该研究的目的是评估替尼利汀与格列美脲相比,作为二甲双胍的附加疗法,对高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平和一些心肾参数的多效应。 这项为期 12 周的开放标签、平行分组、随机对照试验在二甲双胍单药治疗且血糖控制不佳(糖化血红蛋白大于 7% 或 53 mmol/mol)的印度 2 型糖尿病患者中进行。研究终点是 hs-CRP、收缩压 (SBP)、舒张压 (DBP)、血清肌酐、血尿素、估计肾小球滤过率 (eGFR) 的平均变化,以及心血管 (CV) 风险类别从基线到 12 周结束的变化。 70名参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受泰利列汀20毫克,每天一次(35人)或格列美脲1毫克,每天两次(35人),作为二甲双胍500毫克,每天两次的附加治疗。第一组和第二组参与者的平均年龄分别为 50.65 岁和 50.7 岁。在12周结束时,与格列美脲相比,在每方案(PP)和意向治疗(ITT)组中,添加替格列汀可显著降低hs-CRP。在PP组和ITT组中,SBP和DBP、肌酐、尿素、eGFR水平以及CV风险类别的变化均无明显差异。 与格列美脲附加疗法相比,替尼列汀附加疗法在12周后对hs-CRP水平产生了有利影响,对心肾功能参数的影响也相当。该试验已在印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI)进行了前瞻性注册。注册号CTRI/2021/08/035342.
{"title":"Pleiotropic effect of teneligliptin versus glimepiride add-on therapy on hs-CRP and cardiorenal parameters in Indian type 2 diabetes patients: An open-labeled randomized controlled trial","authors":"M. Kanimozhi, Manisha Bisht, Ravikant, Arkapal Bandyopadhyay, Manisha Naithani, S. Handu","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_265_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_265_23","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 The objective of the study was to estimate the pleiotropic effect of teneligliptin on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels and some cardiorenal parameters in comparison to glimepiride, both as add-on therapy to metformin.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 This 12-week open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial was conducted among Indian people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and on metformin monotherapy with poor glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin >7% or 53 mmol/mol). The endpoints were mean change in hs-CRP levels, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), serum creatinine, blood urea, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and change in cardiovascular (CV) risk categories from baseline to end of 12 weeks.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Seventy participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either teneligliptin 20 mg once daily (n = 35) or glimepiride 1 mg twice daily (BD) (n = 35) as an add-on to metformin 500 mg BD. The mean age of the participants was 50.65 and 50.7 years in arms 1 and 2, respectively. At 12-weeks end, teneligliptin add-on caused a statistically significant reduction in hs-CRP compared to glimepiride in both per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) sets. No significant difference was observed for changes in SBP and DBP, creatinine, urea, eGFR levels, and CV risk category in both PP and ITT sets.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Teneligliptin add-on resulted in favorable effects on hs-CRP levels and comparable effects on cardiorenal parameters compared to glimepiride add-on therapy at 12-weeks end.\u0000 This trial has been prospectively registered in CTRI (Clinical Trials Registry of India). Registration number: CTRI/2021/08/035342.\u0000","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141660230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experience of participating in community-based clinical trials from rural Maharashtra: Analysis of over 4000 participant feedback forms 马哈拉施特拉邦农村地区参与社区临床试验的经验:对 4000 多份参与者反馈表的分析
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_289_23
Arunkumar Gondhali, Rakesh Patil, Manoj Dagwar, Ravikant Vishwakarma, H. Lubree, G. Dayma, A. Kawade, Aditi Apte
{"title":"Experience of participating in community-based clinical trials from rural Maharashtra: Analysis of over 4000 participant feedback forms","authors":"Arunkumar Gondhali, Rakesh Patil, Manoj Dagwar, Ravikant Vishwakarma, H. Lubree, G. Dayma, A. Kawade, Aditi Apte","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_289_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_289_23","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141695311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical trial footprint in BRICS: Improvements seen but needs further affirmative action 金砖国家的临床试验足迹:有所改善,但仍需进一步采取积极行动
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_109_24
Sanish Davis
{"title":"Clinical trial footprint in BRICS: Improvements seen but needs further affirmative action","authors":"Sanish Davis","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_109_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_109_24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141704687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bio-entrepreneurs’ bugbear: Regulatory rigmarole 生物企业家的烦恼:繁琐的监管
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_103_24
Arun Bhatt
Indian biotech startup sector – a rapidly growing business segment focused on the development of innovative products has the potential to make significant contributions to the country’s economy. Indian bio-entrepreneurs’ optimistic expectation of rapidly moving product development from bench to bedside faces tremendous challenges of the complex Indian regulatory system, which is shaped by a diversity of regulatory authorities, rules, guidelines, and processes. This brief review discusses specific regulatory issues faced by bio-entrepreneurs investing in a variety of innovative products – new drugs, vaccines, medical devices, cell, and gene therapy and suggests approaches which can ease Indian entrepreneur’s endeavors.
印度生物技术初创企业部门--一个以开发创新产品为重点的快速增长的企业部门--有可能为印度经济做出重大贡献。印度生物企业家对产品开发迅速从实验室走向临床的乐观期望面临着复杂的印度监管体系的巨大挑战,该体系由多种多样的监管机构、规则、指导方针和程序组成。这篇简短的评论讨论了投资各种创新产品--新药、疫苗、医疗器械、细胞和基因疗法--的生物企业家所面临的具体监管问题,并提出了可减轻印度企业家工作压力的方法。
{"title":"Bio-entrepreneurs’ bugbear: Regulatory rigmarole","authors":"Arun Bhatt","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_103_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_103_24","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Indian biotech startup sector – a rapidly growing business segment focused on the development of innovative products has the potential to make significant contributions to the country’s economy. Indian bio-entrepreneurs’ optimistic expectation of rapidly moving product development from bench to bedside faces tremendous challenges of the complex Indian regulatory system, which is shaped by a diversity of regulatory authorities, rules, guidelines, and processes. This brief review discusses specific regulatory issues faced by bio-entrepreneurs investing in a variety of innovative products – new drugs, vaccines, medical devices, cell, and gene therapy and suggests approaches which can ease Indian entrepreneur’s endeavors.","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141692473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sample size calculation in clinical research 临床研究中的样本量计算
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_100_24
P. Ranganathan, Vishal Deo, C. Pramesh
Calculation of sample size is an essential part of research study design since it affects the reliability and feasibility of the research study. In this article, we look at the principles of sample size calculation for different types of research studies.
样本量的计算是研究设计的重要组成部分,因为它影响着研究的可靠性和可行性。本文将介绍不同类型研究的样本量计算原则。
{"title":"Sample size calculation in clinical research","authors":"P. Ranganathan, Vishal Deo, C. Pramesh","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_100_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_100_24","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Calculation of sample size is an essential part of research study design since it affects the reliability and feasibility of the research study. In this article, we look at the principles of sample size calculation for different types of research studies.","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141698090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A clinical study to monitor prescription patterns, clinical outcomes, and adverse drug reactions among patients of various interstitial lung diseases attending respiratory medicine outpatient department at tertiary care hospital in Northern India 一项临床研究,旨在监测在印度北部三级医院呼吸内科门诊就诊的各种间质性肺病患者的处方模式、临床疗效和药物不良反应
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_108_23
Sabahat Hasan, Ajay Verma, Shoebul Haque, Farah Asif, Rajendra Nath, Surya Kant, R. K. Dixit
The aim of this study was to monitor prescription patterns, clinical outcomes, and adverse drug reactions (ADR) among patients of various interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). This prospective study was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics in collaboration with the Department of Respiratory Medicine, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, for a period of 12 months (October 2020–September 2021). A total of 77 patients were enrolled after satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The prescriptions were collected, and necessary details were noted on the case report form. After completion of the study, the data were analyzed for prescription patterns, clinical outcomes, and quality of life with the help of a validated questionnaire-King’s Brief ILD (KBILD) questionnaire. At the same time, ADRs, if any, were assessed using Hartwig’s Severity Assessment Scale and Naranjo Causality Assessment Scale. The most common ILD was acute/chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Average number of drugs per encounter was 4.45. Crepitations were the most common clinical signs. Clubbing and rhonchi were reported maximum in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. It was found that psychological, breathlessness and activities, chest symptoms, and total KBILD reduced significantly after 3 months as compared to baseline with a statistically significant difference as P < 0.01. ADRs were found in 23.38% (18) of the subjects. Maximum ADR reported was gastritis (9.09%), followed by hepatitis (3.90%). The high proportion of patients clinically diagnosed with HP in our study highlights the importance of a detailed environmental exposure history in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with ILD to avoid inaccurate diagnoses. ADR-related hospital admissions are a significant problem in the health-care system.
本研究旨在监测各种间质性肺病(ILD)患者的处方模式、临床结果和药物不良反应(ADR)。 这项前瞻性研究由勒克瑙乔治国王医科大学药理学和治疗学系与呼吸内科学系合作开展,为期 12 个月(2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 9 月)。符合纳入和排除标准的患者共有 77 人。研究人员收集了处方,并在病例报告表中记录了必要的详细信息。研究结束后,在有效问卷--King's Brief ILD(KBILD)问卷的帮助下,对处方模式、临床结果和生活质量进行数据分析。同时,还使用哈特维格严重程度评估量表和纳兰霍因果关系评估量表对ADR(如有)进行了评估。 最常见的 ILD 是急性/慢性超敏性肺炎(HP)。每次就诊的平均用药次数为 4.45 次。心悸是最常见的临床症状。特发性肺纤维化最常见的临床表现是咯血和哮鸣音。研究发现,与基线相比,心理、呼吸困难和活动、胸部症状和总 KBILD 在 3 个月后明显减少,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。23.38%的受试者(18 人)出现了不良反应。报告的最大 ADR 是胃炎(9.09%),其次是肝炎(3.90%)。 在我们的研究中,临床诊断为 HP 的患者比例很高,这突出说明了在对 ILD 患者进行诊断评估时,详细了解环境接触史以避免诊断不准确的重要性。与 ADR 相关的入院治疗是医疗系统中的一个重要问题。
{"title":"A clinical study to monitor prescription patterns, clinical outcomes, and adverse drug reactions among patients of various interstitial lung diseases attending respiratory medicine outpatient department at tertiary care hospital in Northern India","authors":"Sabahat Hasan, Ajay Verma, Shoebul Haque, Farah Asif, Rajendra Nath, Surya Kant, R. K. Dixit","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_108_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_108_23","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 The aim of this study was to monitor prescription patterns, clinical outcomes, and adverse drug reactions (ADR) among patients of various interstitial lung diseases (ILDs).\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 This prospective study was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics in collaboration with the Department of Respiratory Medicine, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, for a period of 12 months (October 2020–September 2021). A total of 77 patients were enrolled after satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The prescriptions were collected, and necessary details were noted on the case report form. After completion of the study, the data were analyzed for prescription patterns, clinical outcomes, and quality of life with the help of a validated questionnaire-King’s Brief ILD (KBILD) questionnaire. At the same time, ADRs, if any, were assessed using Hartwig’s Severity Assessment Scale and Naranjo Causality Assessment Scale.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 The most common ILD was acute/chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Average number of drugs per encounter was 4.45. Crepitations were the most common clinical signs. Clubbing and rhonchi were reported maximum in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. It was found that psychological, breathlessness and activities, chest symptoms, and total KBILD reduced significantly after 3 months as compared to baseline with a statistically significant difference as P < 0.01. ADRs were found in 23.38% (18) of the subjects. Maximum ADR reported was gastritis (9.09%), followed by hepatitis (3.90%).\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 The high proportion of patients clinically diagnosed with HP in our study highlights the importance of a detailed environmental exposure history in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with ILD to avoid inaccurate diagnoses. ADR-related hospital admissions are a significant problem in the health-care system.\u0000","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141700062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Therapeutic effectiveness and adverse drug reactions of mirabegron versus solifenacin in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome 米拉贝琼与索利那新治疗膀胱过度活动综合征的疗效和药物不良反应比较
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_166_23
Megha O. Raj, Jinish Jose, Fredrick Paul, Syam Sreedharan, Nithya Uthaman
Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is a chronic disease characterized by urinary urgency with or without urge incontinence, frequency, and nocturia and antimuscarinic drugs such as solifenacin have been the mainstay of treatment. Mirabegron a beta 3 adrenoreceptor agonist has recently gained importance in the management of OAB. The rationale of the study is that mirabegron improves the storage function without affecting voiding which increases the therapeutic effectiveness. The objective was to determine the therapeutic effectiveness of mirabegron versus solifenacin. A prospective observational study was conducted on 298 patients with OAB syndrome attending the urology outpatient department of government medical college after obtaining institutional review board clearance. Patients of both genders, belonging to the 18–65 years of age group, attending the urology outpatient department were selected for the study. Patients were evaluated using the OAB-validated 8-question awareness tool (OAB-V8 score) before and after receiving drugs by direct questionnaire method after receiving informed consent. Patients were prescribed either solifenacin 5 mg or mirabegron 25 mg once daily by the urologist. Follow-up was done after 4 and 12 weeks. Adverse drug reactions of the drugs were assessed using the Central Drug Standard Control Organization suspected adverse reaction (ADR) form, and ADRs were notified to the nearest ADR monitoring center. The mirabegron group showed maximum improvement in the mean OAB-V8 score values from baseline at 4 weeks (12.82 ± 5.86, P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (5.74 ± 3.31, P < 0.001) when compared to solifenacin. OAB-V8 scores of the solifenacin group also showed significant improvement from the baseline at 4 weeks (15.30 ± 5.54, P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (8.05 ± 4.59, P < 0.001). Heart rate, systolic, and diastolic blood pressures did not show significant changes during the follow-up in both the study groups. Thirteen patients developed ADRs such as dry mouth (four patients) and constipation (nine patients) in the solifenacin group. No ADRs were noted in the mirabegron group. Mirabegron showed maximum improvement in the OAB-V8 scores in patients with OAB syndrome, although the solifenacin group also showed improvement. Adverse effects were less in the mirabegron group when compared to the solifenacin group.
膀胱过度活动症(OAB)是一种慢性疾病,以尿急为特征,伴有或不伴有急迫性尿失禁、尿频和夜尿症。Mirabegron 是一种 beta 3 肾上腺素受体激动剂,最近在治疗 OAB 方面越来越受到重视。这项研究的基本原理是米拉贝琼能改善储尿功能而不影响排尿,从而提高治疗效果。研究的目的是确定米拉贝琼与索利那新的治疗效果。 在获得机构审查委员会批准后,我们对在公立医学院泌尿科门诊就诊的 298 名 OAB 综合征患者进行了前瞻性观察研究。研究选择了在泌尿科门诊就诊的 18-65 岁男女患者。在征得知情同意后,采用直接问卷调查法对患者用药前后的OAB-V8评分进行评估。泌尿科医生为患者开具了索利那新 5 毫克或米拉贝琼 25 毫克的处方,每日一次。4 周和 12 周后进行随访。使用中央药品标准控制组织的疑似不良反应(ADR)表评估药物的不良反应,并将不良反应通报给最近的ADR监测中心。 与索利那新相比,米拉贝琼组在4周(12.82±5.86,P<0.001)和12周(5.74±3.31,P<0.001)时的OAB-V8平均评分值与基线相比改善最大。在4周(15.30 ± 5.54,P < 0.001)和12周(8.05 ± 4.59,P < 0.001)时,索非那新组的OAB-V8评分与基线相比也有显著改善。两组患者的心率、收缩压和舒张压在随访期间均无明显变化。索利芬那新组的 13 名患者出现了口干(4 名)和便秘(9 名)等不良反应。米拉贝琼组没有出现不良反应。 在OAB综合征患者的OAB-V8评分中,米拉贝琼的改善幅度最大,但索非那新组也有改善。与索利那新组相比,米拉贝琼组的不良反应较少。
{"title":"Therapeutic effectiveness and adverse drug reactions of mirabegron versus solifenacin in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome","authors":"Megha O. Raj, Jinish Jose, Fredrick Paul, Syam Sreedharan, Nithya Uthaman","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_166_23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_166_23","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is a chronic disease characterized by urinary urgency with or without urge incontinence, frequency, and nocturia and antimuscarinic drugs such as solifenacin have been the mainstay of treatment. Mirabegron a beta 3 adrenoreceptor agonist has recently gained importance in the management of OAB. The rationale of the study is that mirabegron improves the storage function without affecting voiding which increases the therapeutic effectiveness. The objective was to determine the therapeutic effectiveness of mirabegron versus solifenacin.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 A prospective observational study was conducted on 298 patients with OAB syndrome attending the urology outpatient department of government medical college after obtaining institutional review board clearance. Patients of both genders, belonging to the 18–65 years of age group, attending the urology outpatient department were selected for the study. Patients were evaluated using the OAB-validated 8-question awareness tool (OAB-V8 score) before and after receiving drugs by direct questionnaire method after receiving informed consent. Patients were prescribed either solifenacin 5 mg or mirabegron 25 mg once daily by the urologist. Follow-up was done after 4 and 12 weeks. Adverse drug reactions of the drugs were assessed using the Central Drug Standard Control Organization suspected adverse reaction (ADR) form, and ADRs were notified to the nearest ADR monitoring center.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 The mirabegron group showed maximum improvement in the mean OAB-V8 score values from baseline at 4 weeks (12.82 ± 5.86, P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (5.74 ± 3.31, P < 0.001) when compared to solifenacin. OAB-V8 scores of the solifenacin group also showed significant improvement from the baseline at 4 weeks (15.30 ± 5.54, P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (8.05 ± 4.59, P < 0.001). Heart rate, systolic, and diastolic blood pressures did not show significant changes during the follow-up in both the study groups. Thirteen patients developed ADRs such as dry mouth (four patients) and constipation (nine patients) in the solifenacin group. No ADRs were noted in the mirabegron group.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 Mirabegron showed maximum improvement in the OAB-V8 scores in patients with OAB syndrome, although the solifenacin group also showed improvement. Adverse effects were less in the mirabegron group when compared to the solifenacin group.\u0000","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141127504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary on lack of transparency for Investigators in clinical trials: A bibliometric analysis of literature 关于临床试验研究者缺乏透明度的评论:文献计量分析
Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_12_24
Rohit Prasad
{"title":"Commentary on lack of transparency for Investigators in clinical trials: A bibliometric analysis of literature","authors":"Rohit Prasad","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_12_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_12_24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141127556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Perspectives in Clinical Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1