ChatGPT Media Coverage Metrics; Initial Examination

Nicole S. Delellis, Yimin Chen, Sarah E. Cornwell, Dominique Kelly, Alex Mayhew, Sodiq Onaolapo, Victoria L. Rubin
{"title":"<scp>ChatGPT</scp> Media Coverage Metrics; Initial Examination","authors":"Nicole S. Delellis, Yimin Chen, Sarah E. Cornwell, Dominique Kelly, Alex Mayhew, Sodiq Onaolapo, Victoria L. Rubin","doi":"10.1002/pra2.903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper presents an overview of coverage of OpenAI's ChatGPT in media outlets from November 2022–March 2023, a comparison to previous media coverage of the chatbot Tay across the same outlets, and a count of ChatGPT media articles pertaining to government legislation and regulation. The New York Times, Wired, Gizmodo, The Globe and Mail, and The Guardian were searched for coverage. Across all five outlets there is an uptick in media coverage surrounding ChatGPT, with total numbers of included articles per month being 0 in November, 39 in December, 68 in January, 104 in February, and 143 in March. Findings exemplify the trend of increased coverage of ChatGPT in media public discourse, which contrasts with previous smaller media coverage of Tay. Examination of headlines and subheadings of included articles reveals minimal coverage (5.7%) dedicated to government legislation of ChatGPT. Future research will evaluate what is being said about ChatGPT within these media outlets.","PeriodicalId":37833,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper presents an overview of coverage of OpenAI's ChatGPT in media outlets from November 2022–March 2023, a comparison to previous media coverage of the chatbot Tay across the same outlets, and a count of ChatGPT media articles pertaining to government legislation and regulation. The New York Times, Wired, Gizmodo, The Globe and Mail, and The Guardian were searched for coverage. Across all five outlets there is an uptick in media coverage surrounding ChatGPT, with total numbers of included articles per month being 0 in November, 39 in December, 68 in January, 104 in February, and 143 in March. Findings exemplify the trend of increased coverage of ChatGPT in media public discourse, which contrasts with previous smaller media coverage of Tay. Examination of headlines and subheadings of included articles reveals minimal coverage (5.7%) dedicated to government legislation of ChatGPT. Future research will evaluate what is being said about ChatGPT within these media outlets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT媒体覆盖指标;初始检查
本文概述了2022年11月至2023年3月期间OpenAI ChatGPT在媒体上的报道,与之前相同媒体对聊天机器人Tay的报道进行了比较,并对ChatGPT媒体有关政府立法和监管的文章进行了统计。《纽约时报》、《连线》、Gizmodo、《环球邮报》和《卫报》都被搜索了相关报道。在这五家媒体中,围绕ChatGPT的媒体报道都有所增加,11月的文章总数为0篇,12月为39篇,1月为68篇,2月为104篇,3月为143篇。研究结果表明,在媒体公共话语中,ChatGPT的报道有增加的趋势,这与之前媒体对Tay的较小报道形成了对比。对纳入文章的标题和副标题的检查显示,用于ChatGPT的政府立法的覆盖率最低(5.7%)。未来的研究将评估这些媒体对ChatGPT的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Considering the Role of Information and Context in Promoting Health-Related Behavioral Change. Transforming Indigenous Knowledges Stewardship Praxis through an Ethics of Care “I Am in a Privileged Situation”: Examining the Factors Promoting Inequity in Open Access Publishing Shifting Roles of Citizen Scientists Accelerates High‐Quality Data Collection for Climate Change Research Investigating the Intersections of Ethics and Artificial Intelligence in the Collections as Data Position Papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1