Comparing Crisis Communication on TikTok and YouTube: A Case Study of the 2023 California Floods

Yiran Duan, Christy Khoury, Alexander O. Smith, Una Joh, Jeff Hemsley
{"title":"Comparing Crisis Communication on <scp>TikTok</scp> and <scp>YouTube</scp>: A Case Study of the 2023 California Floods","authors":"Yiran Duan, Christy Khoury, Alexander O. Smith, Una Joh, Jeff Hemsley","doi":"10.1002/pra2.908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In January 2023, heavy California flooding prompted users to capture and share video footage of their impacted surroundings. This preliminary study uses this crisis event to compare commenting behavior across three video content formats: YouTube videos, YouTube shorts, and TikTok videos. Using network and regression analysis to study 45 videos across these three formats, we find that users commented and replied to others more on YouTube than TikTok despite TikTok videos having more views than YouTube videos. Additionally, we find the most vibrant comment behavior under YouTube shorts. This work provokes additional research to understand the exact ways in which platform design and affordances can influence crisis communication around a specific event.","PeriodicalId":37833,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In January 2023, heavy California flooding prompted users to capture and share video footage of their impacted surroundings. This preliminary study uses this crisis event to compare commenting behavior across three video content formats: YouTube videos, YouTube shorts, and TikTok videos. Using network and regression analysis to study 45 videos across these three formats, we find that users commented and replied to others more on YouTube than TikTok despite TikTok videos having more views than YouTube videos. Additionally, we find the most vibrant comment behavior under YouTube shorts. This work provokes additional research to understand the exact ways in which platform design and affordances can influence crisis communication around a specific event.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较抖音和YouTube上的危机传播:以2023年加州洪水为例
2023年1月,加州严重的洪水促使用户捕捉并分享受影响环境的视频片段。这项初步研究利用这一危机事件来比较三种视频内容格式(YouTube视频、YouTube短片和TikTok视频)的评论行为。使用网络和回归分析研究了这三种格式的45个视频,我们发现,尽管TikTok视频的观看次数比YouTube视频多,但YouTube上的用户评论和回复他人的次数比TikTok更多。此外,我们发现YouTube短片下的评论行为最为活跃。这项工作引发了更多的研究,以了解平台设计和功能支持如何影响围绕特定事件的危机沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Considering the Role of Information and Context in Promoting Health-Related Behavioral Change. Transforming Indigenous Knowledges Stewardship Praxis through an Ethics of Care “I Am in a Privileged Situation”: Examining the Factors Promoting Inequity in Open Access Publishing Shifting Roles of Citizen Scientists Accelerates High‐Quality Data Collection for Climate Change Research Investigating the Intersections of Ethics and Artificial Intelligence in the Collections as Data Position Papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1