Maritime Dispute Resolution With Mediation Techniques

SASI Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477
Sabela Gayo
{"title":"Maritime Dispute Resolution With Mediation Techniques","authors":"Sabela Gayo","doi":"10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In resolving ordinary maritime disputes related to national borders, from several types of dispute resolution, mediation is the right way to resolve disputes involving third parties.Purposes of the Research: This paper aims to find out that in resolving martim aurann disputes the law is contained in international law, namely UNCLOS 1982 which regulates martim disputes.Methods of the Research: The type of research is normative juridical with analysis using legal documents in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.Results of the Research: Alternative settlement of territorial boundary disputes can be done by, first, referring to UNCLOS 1982 through Bilateral Mutual Agreement in drawing a temporary line (equidistant line) using the equity principle and considering relevant factors and the possibility of modifying the equidistant line with the diplomatic approach of both countries, second, through the ASEAN mechanism, and. third, through the mechanism of the International Court of justice by promoting equitable principles and relevant circumstances.However, resolving with the second alternative is more appropriate because it can use mediation methods in maritime dispute resolution.","PeriodicalId":53158,"journal":{"name":"SASI","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SASI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i3.1477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In resolving ordinary maritime disputes related to national borders, from several types of dispute resolution, mediation is the right way to resolve disputes involving third parties.Purposes of the Research: This paper aims to find out that in resolving martim aurann disputes the law is contained in international law, namely UNCLOS 1982 which regulates martim disputes.Methods of the Research: The type of research is normative juridical with analysis using legal documents in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials.Results of the Research: Alternative settlement of territorial boundary disputes can be done by, first, referring to UNCLOS 1982 through Bilateral Mutual Agreement in drawing a temporary line (equidistant line) using the equity principle and considering relevant factors and the possibility of modifying the equidistant line with the diplomatic approach of both countries, second, through the ASEAN mechanism, and. third, through the mechanism of the International Court of justice by promoting equitable principles and relevant circumstances.However, resolving with the second alternative is more appropriate because it can use mediation methods in maritime dispute resolution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海事争议解决与调解技术
导读:在解决涉及国家边界的普通海事纠纷中,从纠纷解决的几种类型来看,调解是解决涉及第三方纠纷的正确方式。研究目的:本文旨在发现在解决海事争端中,法律是包含在国际法中,即1982年的《联合国海洋法公约》,它规范了海事争端。研究方法:研究类型为规范司法分析,采用法律文件的形式,包括一级法律资料、二级法律资料和三级法律资料。研究结果:领土边界争端的替代性解决方式有:一是参照1982年《联合国海洋法公约》,通过双边协议,利用公平原则划定临时分界线(等距线),并考虑相关因素和两国通过外交途径修改等距线的可能性;二是通过东盟机制;第三,通过国际法院机制,促进公平原则和有关情况。然而,采用第二种解决方式更为合适,因为它可以在海事纠纷解决中使用调解方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Legal Consequences of Transferring Trade Secrets on Under Hand’s Scheme Ius Constituendum Formulating Basic Values of Indigenous Peoples in Constitutional Amendments The Protection of Human Rights in the Case of Non-Criminal Narcotics Users Arrangements Concerning Reclamation and Their Legal Impacts in View from UNCLOS 1982 The Sharia Funding Risk Issues in Fintech Securities Crowdfunding: Realization of Legal Certainty in the Shari'ah Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1