The Protection of Human Rights in the Case of Non-Criminal Narcotics Users

SASI Pub Date : 2023-12-18 DOI:10.47268/sasi.v29i4.1779
A. Laksana
{"title":"The Protection of Human Rights in the Case of Non-Criminal Narcotics Users","authors":"A. Laksana","doi":"10.47268/sasi.v29i4.1779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Narcotics use as a complex global issue has an impact on human rights, especially in the context of criminal law. Although some countries, including Indonesia, are beginning to recognize human rights protections in non-criminal narcotics use, the main challenge is striking a balance between strict regulation and appropriate protection for individuals who need narcotics for treatment or non-criminal purposes. Purposes of the Research:  The aim of this research is to analyze relevant laws and regulations and related practices in protecting human rights in the case of non-criminal narcotics users. Methods of the Research: This research uses normative legal research methods to analyze laws and regulations related to non-criminal narcotics use. Data sources include statutory documents, court decisions, and legal literature. Data analysis will look for patterns and evaluate regulatory compliance with human rights principles.Results of the Research: To protect human rights in cases of non-criminal narcotics use in Indonesia, legislation plays an important role, although challenges such as abuse of power and social stigma remain. Cooperation between government, NGOs and civil society is needed to implement existing regulations and increase public understanding of human rights. Indonesia needs to find a balance between strict narcotics regulations and protecting individual rights. This involves clear definitions for “non-criminal” narcotics, fair law enforcement, as well as safeguarding individual privacy. The challenges involve racial and social injustice in drug law enforcement and require an evidence-based approach that engages diverse stakeholders. Continuous research and analysis is needed to support better policies to address the narcotics problem.","PeriodicalId":53158,"journal":{"name":"SASI","volume":" 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SASI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i4.1779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Narcotics use as a complex global issue has an impact on human rights, especially in the context of criminal law. Although some countries, including Indonesia, are beginning to recognize human rights protections in non-criminal narcotics use, the main challenge is striking a balance between strict regulation and appropriate protection for individuals who need narcotics for treatment or non-criminal purposes. Purposes of the Research:  The aim of this research is to analyze relevant laws and regulations and related practices in protecting human rights in the case of non-criminal narcotics users. Methods of the Research: This research uses normative legal research methods to analyze laws and regulations related to non-criminal narcotics use. Data sources include statutory documents, court decisions, and legal literature. Data analysis will look for patterns and evaluate regulatory compliance with human rights principles.Results of the Research: To protect human rights in cases of non-criminal narcotics use in Indonesia, legislation plays an important role, although challenges such as abuse of power and social stigma remain. Cooperation between government, NGOs and civil society is needed to implement existing regulations and increase public understanding of human rights. Indonesia needs to find a balance between strict narcotics regulations and protecting individual rights. This involves clear definitions for “non-criminal” narcotics, fair law enforcement, as well as safeguarding individual privacy. The challenges involve racial and social injustice in drug law enforcement and require an evidence-based approach that engages diverse stakeholders. Continuous research and analysis is needed to support better policies to address the narcotics problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护非刑事犯罪麻醉品使用者的人权
导言:使用麻醉品是一个复杂的全球性问题,对人权有影响,特别是在刑法方面。尽管包括印度尼西亚在内的一些国家开始承认在非刑事犯罪的麻醉品使用中保护人权,但主要的挑战是在严格监管和适当保护因治疗或非刑事犯罪目的而需要麻醉品的个人之间取得平衡。研究目的: 本研究的目的是分析在保护非刑事犯罪麻醉品使用者人权方面的相关法律法规和相关做法。研究方法:本研究采用规范性法律研究方法,分析与非刑事犯罪麻醉品使用相关的法律法规。数据来源包括法规文件、法院判决和法律文献。数据分析将寻找规律,评估法规是否符合人权原则:在印度尼西亚,尽管滥用权力和社会污名化等挑战依然存在,但立法在保护非刑事使用麻醉品案件中的人权方面发挥着重要作用。政府、非政府组织和民间社会之间需要开展合作,以执行现有法规并提高公众对人权的认识。印度尼西亚需要在严格的麻醉品法规和保护个人权利之间找到平衡。这涉及对 "非犯罪 "毒品的明确定义、公平执法以及保护个人隐私。这些挑战涉及缉毒执法中的种族和社会不公,需要采取循证方法,让不同的利益相关者参与进来。需要不断进行研究和分析,以支持制定更好的政策来解决毒品问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Legal Consequences of Transferring Trade Secrets on Under Hand’s Scheme Ius Constituendum Formulating Basic Values of Indigenous Peoples in Constitutional Amendments The Protection of Human Rights in the Case of Non-Criminal Narcotics Users Arrangements Concerning Reclamation and Their Legal Impacts in View from UNCLOS 1982 The Sharia Funding Risk Issues in Fintech Securities Crowdfunding: Realization of Legal Certainty in the Shari'ah Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1