Prioritizing Riverine Bridge Interventions: A Hydrological and Multidimensional Approach

Q2 Engineering Designs Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.3390/designs7050117
Alan Huarca Pulcha, Alain Jorge Espinoza Vigil, Julian Booker
{"title":"Prioritizing Riverine Bridge Interventions: A Hydrological and Multidimensional Approach","authors":"Alan Huarca Pulcha, Alain Jorge Espinoza Vigil, Julian Booker","doi":"10.3390/designs7050117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, most bridges fail due to hydrological causes such as scouring or flooding. Therefore, using a hydrological approach, this study proposes a methodology that contributes to prioritizing the intervention of bridges to prevent their collapse. Through an exhaustive literature review, an evaluation matrix subdivided into four dimensions was developed and a total of 18 evaluation parameters were considered, distributed as follows: four environmental, six technical, four social, and four economic. This matrix was applied to eight bridges with a history of hydrological problems in the same river and validated through semi-structured interviews with specialists. Data were collected through field visits, journalistic information, a review of the gauged basin’s historical hydrological flow rates, and consultations with the population. Modeling was then conducted, which considered the influence of gullies that discharge additional flow using HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS, before being calibrated. The application of the matrix, which is an optimal tool for prioritizing bridge interventions, revealed that five bridges have a high vulnerability with scores between 3 and 3.56, and three bridges have a medium vulnerability with scores between 2.75 and 2.94. The hydrological multidimensional approach, which can be adapted for similar studies, contributes to a better decision-making process for important infrastructure interventions such as riverine bridges.","PeriodicalId":53150,"journal":{"name":"Designs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Designs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/designs7050117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, most bridges fail due to hydrological causes such as scouring or flooding. Therefore, using a hydrological approach, this study proposes a methodology that contributes to prioritizing the intervention of bridges to prevent their collapse. Through an exhaustive literature review, an evaluation matrix subdivided into four dimensions was developed and a total of 18 evaluation parameters were considered, distributed as follows: four environmental, six technical, four social, and four economic. This matrix was applied to eight bridges with a history of hydrological problems in the same river and validated through semi-structured interviews with specialists. Data were collected through field visits, journalistic information, a review of the gauged basin’s historical hydrological flow rates, and consultations with the population. Modeling was then conducted, which considered the influence of gullies that discharge additional flow using HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS, before being calibrated. The application of the matrix, which is an optimal tool for prioritizing bridge interventions, revealed that five bridges have a high vulnerability with scores between 3 and 3.56, and three bridges have a medium vulnerability with scores between 2.75 and 2.94. The hydrological multidimensional approach, which can be adapted for similar studies, contributes to a better decision-making process for important infrastructure interventions such as riverine bridges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
河流桥梁干预的优先次序:水文和多维方法
在全球范围内,大多数桥梁因水文原因而倒塌,如冲刷或洪水。因此,使用水文方法,本研究提出了一种有助于优先干预桥梁以防止其倒塌的方法。通过详尽的文献回顾,建立了一个细分为四个维度的评价矩阵,共考虑了18个评价参数,分布如下:4个环境参数、6个技术参数、4个社会参数和4个经济参数。该矩阵应用于同一河流中具有水文问题历史的八座桥梁,并通过与专家的半结构化访谈进行验证。数据是通过实地访问、新闻资料、对测量流域历史水文流量的审查以及与居民协商收集的。然后进行建模,在校准之前,使用HEC-HMS和HEC-RAS考虑了排放附加流量的沟渠的影响。该矩阵是桥梁干预措施优先排序的最优工具,结果表明,5座桥梁的脆弱性得分在3 ~ 3.56之间,为高脆弱性,3座桥梁的脆弱性得分在2.75 ~ 2.94之间,为中等脆弱性。水文多维方法可以适用于类似的研究,有助于为重要的基础设施干预措施(如河流桥梁)提供更好的决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Designs
Designs Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mechanical Transmissions with Convex–Concave Multipair Contact of Teeth in Precessional Gearing Design and Operational Assessment of a Railroad Track Robot for Railcar Undercarriage Condition Inspection Computational Investigation of the Fluidic Properties of Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) Structures in Tissue Engineering Designs of Miniature Optomechanical Sensors for Measurements of Acceleration with Frequencies of Hundreds of Hertz Mapping the Potential of Zero-Energy Building in Greece Using Roof Photovoltaics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1