Engineering thinking: Vectors of development in the context of the transformation of the scientific picture of the world

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.17853/1994-5639-2023-8-12-48
L. M. Andryukhina, B. N. Guzanov, S. V. Anakhov
{"title":"Engineering thinking: Vectors of development in the context of the transformation of the scientific picture of the world","authors":"L. M. Andryukhina, B. N. Guzanov, S. V. Anakhov","doi":"10.17853/1994-5639-2023-8-12-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction . Considerable attention is paid to the training of highly qualified engineering personnel today. But the ongoing processes of convergence, the emergence of end-to-end technologies radically change not only the technological platform of production, but lead to changes in the scientific picture of the world, which directly affects the nature of engineering thinking, expanding its range far beyond the technical sphere. Without the understanding of the features of modern engineering thinking, it is impossible to design the content and forms of education for future engineers. Actively ongoing processes of technological transformation in the education system give rise to a situation of uncertainty, and the desire to respond to emerging challenges, most often, is expressed in disparate, local educational solutions, if they are not based on scientifically sound conceptual models of personnel training. Aim . The present research aims to form a systematic understanding of the structure of engineering thinking and identify the trends of its transformation in the context of changes in the scientific picture of the world. Methodology and research methods . Theoretical and methodological analysis was based on the philosophical methodology of science, which made it possible to single out the main general scientific approaches in understanding the essence of engineering thinking and to consider the influence of the modern transforming scientific picture of the world on the structures of thinking in engineering activities. On the basis of the case study method, a reconstruction and analysis of typical situations encountered in the practice of training engineers and developing educational programmes was carried out to demonstrate the significance of the theoretical and methodological results obtained. The case study was used as a method of scientific research, which has its advantages over other empirical methods in the area under study. Result s. The main methodological approaches in understanding engineering thinking are identified and analysed: practice-oriented, phenomenological, conceptual, and contextual. A systemic model of engineering thinking is substantiated, including three levels: technological (mental activity, technologies of thinking); regulatory-target (scientific picture of the world, paradigms, style of thinking, etc.); value-semantic (value attitudes, positions, ideals, norms, strategic priorities, semantic patterns). Typical cases that are encountered in the practice of training engineering personnel are analysed. It is shown how the changes in the scientific picture of the world and methodological reflexive analysis allow the strategies for designing educational programmes to be adjusted. The influence of the modern convergent environment on the formation of value-semantic and regulatory-target structures of engineering thinking and on the forms of the engineer’s mental activity is revealed. Innovative models for the training of future engineers are presented (on the example of the Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University), focused on the methodological approaches presented in the article to understanding engineering thinking. Scientific novelty . The novelty of the proposed research is determined by the expansion of the theoretical and methodological framework for considering engineering thinking and the vectors of its development. The issues of the development of engineering thinking are most often discussed within the framework of technological development or in the logic of intra-professional transformations; the authors of the current study rely on a systematic vision of scientific and engineering activities. This made it possible to introduce into the field of scientific consideration of engineering thinking and engineering activities such regulatory epistemological structures as the scientific picture of the world, paradigm, style of thinking, etc., as well as value-semantic structures of thinking and activity (value attitudes, ideals, standards activities, norms, strategic priorities, semantic patterns, etc.). In theoretical terms, the study is important for overcoming narrow technological and technocratic approaches, for a reasonable etermination of the prospects for the development of engineering thinking in the conditions of convergent processes. Practical significance . The practical significance of the study is the determination of the methodological foundations for the practice of decision-making in the field of engineering training.","PeriodicalId":44143,"journal":{"name":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-8-12-48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction . Considerable attention is paid to the training of highly qualified engineering personnel today. But the ongoing processes of convergence, the emergence of end-to-end technologies radically change not only the technological platform of production, but lead to changes in the scientific picture of the world, which directly affects the nature of engineering thinking, expanding its range far beyond the technical sphere. Without the understanding of the features of modern engineering thinking, it is impossible to design the content and forms of education for future engineers. Actively ongoing processes of technological transformation in the education system give rise to a situation of uncertainty, and the desire to respond to emerging challenges, most often, is expressed in disparate, local educational solutions, if they are not based on scientifically sound conceptual models of personnel training. Aim . The present research aims to form a systematic understanding of the structure of engineering thinking and identify the trends of its transformation in the context of changes in the scientific picture of the world. Methodology and research methods . Theoretical and methodological analysis was based on the philosophical methodology of science, which made it possible to single out the main general scientific approaches in understanding the essence of engineering thinking and to consider the influence of the modern transforming scientific picture of the world on the structures of thinking in engineering activities. On the basis of the case study method, a reconstruction and analysis of typical situations encountered in the practice of training engineers and developing educational programmes was carried out to demonstrate the significance of the theoretical and methodological results obtained. The case study was used as a method of scientific research, which has its advantages over other empirical methods in the area under study. Result s. The main methodological approaches in understanding engineering thinking are identified and analysed: practice-oriented, phenomenological, conceptual, and contextual. A systemic model of engineering thinking is substantiated, including three levels: technological (mental activity, technologies of thinking); regulatory-target (scientific picture of the world, paradigms, style of thinking, etc.); value-semantic (value attitudes, positions, ideals, norms, strategic priorities, semantic patterns). Typical cases that are encountered in the practice of training engineering personnel are analysed. It is shown how the changes in the scientific picture of the world and methodological reflexive analysis allow the strategies for designing educational programmes to be adjusted. The influence of the modern convergent environment on the formation of value-semantic and regulatory-target structures of engineering thinking and on the forms of the engineer’s mental activity is revealed. Innovative models for the training of future engineers are presented (on the example of the Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University), focused on the methodological approaches presented in the article to understanding engineering thinking. Scientific novelty . The novelty of the proposed research is determined by the expansion of the theoretical and methodological framework for considering engineering thinking and the vectors of its development. The issues of the development of engineering thinking are most often discussed within the framework of technological development or in the logic of intra-professional transformations; the authors of the current study rely on a systematic vision of scientific and engineering activities. This made it possible to introduce into the field of scientific consideration of engineering thinking and engineering activities such regulatory epistemological structures as the scientific picture of the world, paradigm, style of thinking, etc., as well as value-semantic structures of thinking and activity (value attitudes, ideals, standards activities, norms, strategic priorities, semantic patterns, etc.). In theoretical terms, the study is important for overcoming narrow technological and technocratic approaches, for a reasonable etermination of the prospects for the development of engineering thinking in the conditions of convergent processes. Practical significance . The practical significance of the study is the determination of the methodological foundations for the practice of decision-making in the field of engineering training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工程思维:在世界科学图景转变的背景下的发展矢量
介绍。今天,对高素质工程人才的培养受到了相当大的重视。但是,正在进行的融合过程,端到端技术的出现,不仅从根本上改变了生产的技术平台,而且导致了世界科学图景的变化,这直接影响了工程思维的本质,将其范围扩展到远远超出技术领域。不了解现代工程思维的特点,就不可能设计未来工程师教育的内容和形式。教育系统中正在进行的积极的技术改革进程造成了一种不确定的情况,对新出现的挑战作出反应的愿望往往表现为不同的地方教育解决办法,如果这些办法不是以科学上合理的人才培训概念模式为基础的话。的目标。本研究旨在形成对工程思维结构的系统理解,并在世界科学图景变化的背景下确定其转变趋势。方法论和研究方法。理论和方法分析是建立在科学的哲学方法论的基础上的,这使得在理解工程思维的本质时,有可能挑出主要的一般科学方法,并考虑现代不断变化的世界科学图景对工程活动中思维结构的影响。在案例研究方法的基础上,对工程师培训和教育方案制定实践中遇到的典型情况进行了重构和分析,以证明所获得的理论和方法结果的意义。案例研究作为一种科学研究方法,在研究领域具有其他实证方法所无法比拟的优势。结果:在理解工程思维的主要方法论方法被识别和分析:实践导向,现象学,概念和上下文。构建了工程思维的系统模型,包括三个层面:技术层面(心理活动、思维技术);调节目标(世界的科学图景、范式、思维方式等);价值语义(价值态度、立场、理想、规范、战略重点、语义模式)。分析了工程人才培养实践中遇到的典型案例。它显示了世界科学图景和方法学反思分析的变化如何使设计教育方案的战略得以调整。揭示了现代趋同环境对工程思维价值语义结构和调节目标结构的形成以及对工程师心理活动形式的影响。提出了培养未来工程师的创新模式(以俄罗斯国立职业教育大学为例),重点是文章中提出的理解工程思维的方法论方法。科学的新奇。所提出的研究的新颖性是由考虑工程思维及其发展向量的理论和方法框架的扩展决定的。工程思维发展的问题最常在技术发展的框架内或在专业内部转变的逻辑中讨论;目前这项研究的作者依赖于对科学和工程活动的系统看法。这使得将诸如世界的科学图景、范式、思维方式等规范性认识论结构以及思维和活动的价值-语义结构(价值态度、理想、标准活动、规范、战略优先事项、语义模式等)引入工程思维和工程活动的科学考虑领域成为可能。从理论上讲,这项研究对于克服狭隘的技术和技术官僚方法,合理确定工程思维在趋同过程条件下的发展前景是很重要的。现实意义。本研究的现实意义在于确定工程培训领域决策实践的方法论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science
Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
42.90%
发文量
56
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ensuring the unity of the federal system of scientific and methodological support for teacher professional development: Opportunities and risks Influence of academic-professional hardiness on the subjective well-being of students in socionomic professions Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Bystander strategies Contemporary contexts of higher medical education development: Patient-centred care in medical students’ understanding Publication activity of Russian university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1