One does not fit all: what is in a salesperson sample?

Brian N. Rutherford, Martha Troncoza, Scott C. Ambrose, Nwamaka Anaza, Ryan Matthews
{"title":"One does not fit all: what is in a salesperson sample?","authors":"Brian N. Rutherford, Martha Troncoza, Scott C. Ambrose, Nwamaka Anaza, Ryan Matthews","doi":"10.1080/08853134.2023.2252610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study conducts a systematic review of salesperson sampling within the pages of the Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management from 2013 to 2022. A total of 284 papers (all inclusive) were identified in the first step of the review. Next articles were qualified based on article types, methodology (research approach), and respondent type before additional analysis was conducted. This resulted in 109 published manuscripts with 147 unique salesperson samples for further review. Specifically, sample scope and participant profiles were examined based on the 109 articles. The sample scope included response metrics, study deployment, and contextual aspects. Participant profile includes the examination of demographics, experience, work details, and performance. Ensuing the systematic review, managerial importance and implications, best practices, and research insights and future research directions are provided. This includes guidance on the sampling frame overview, data collection, and sample contexts of participants for a better understanding of what information should be included in research studies. In turn, this study puts forth evidence that one type of salesperson sample does not fit all sales research, and the generalizability of the sample should be carefully considered.Keywords: Systematic reviewsalespersonsamplingbest practices Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":16697,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2023.2252610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

AbstractThis study conducts a systematic review of salesperson sampling within the pages of the Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management from 2013 to 2022. A total of 284 papers (all inclusive) were identified in the first step of the review. Next articles were qualified based on article types, methodology (research approach), and respondent type before additional analysis was conducted. This resulted in 109 published manuscripts with 147 unique salesperson samples for further review. Specifically, sample scope and participant profiles were examined based on the 109 articles. The sample scope included response metrics, study deployment, and contextual aspects. Participant profile includes the examination of demographics, experience, work details, and performance. Ensuing the systematic review, managerial importance and implications, best practices, and research insights and future research directions are provided. This includes guidance on the sampling frame overview, data collection, and sample contexts of participants for a better understanding of what information should be included in research studies. In turn, this study puts forth evidence that one type of salesperson sample does not fit all sales research, and the generalizability of the sample should be carefully considered.Keywords: Systematic reviewsalespersonsamplingbest practices Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个不适合所有人:销售人员的样本是什么?
摘要本研究对2013年至2022年《个人销售与销售管理杂志》的销售人员样本进行了系统的回顾。第一步评审共确定论文284篇(含全部)。在进行额外分析之前,根据文章类型,方法(研究方法)和受访者类型,对接下来的文章进行了限定。这产生了109篇发表的手稿和147个独特的销售人员样本供进一步审查。具体而言,基于这109篇文章对样本范围和参与者概况进行了检查。样本范围包括响应度量、研究部署和上下文方面。参与者简介包括人口统计、经验、工作细节和绩效的检查。在系统回顾之后,提出了管理的重要性和意义、最佳实践、研究见解和未来的研究方向。这包括对抽样框架概述、数据收集和参与者样本背景的指导,以便更好地理解研究中应包括哪些信息。反过来,本研究提出的证据表明,一种类型的销售人员样本并不适合所有的销售研究,样本的普遍性应仔细考虑。关键词:系统评价销售人员抽样最佳实践披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Personal selling and sales management abstracts Frontline ambidexterity: a systematic review and future research agenda Sales technology research: a review and future research agenda Social media in response to COVID-19: how increased social media usage affects the performance of B2B salespeople in the “new normal” Team selling: a review, implications, and an agenda for sales team research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1