“Life of Constantine” by Eusebius of Caesarea as “sacred history”: a typology of Moses — Constantine

Maksim Prikhodko
{"title":"“Life of Constantine” by Eusebius of Caesarea as “sacred history”: a typology of Moses — Constantine","authors":"Maksim Prikhodko","doi":"10.15382/sturi2023109.9-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article, the conceptual model of the holy emperor in one of the first monuments of Christian hagiographic literature, “Life Constantine” by Eusebius of Caesarea, is investigated. The analysis is based on the typological comparison of Emperor Constantine with the biblical figure of Moses, conducted by Eusebius. As part of this comparison, the development of a “sacred image” in history is traced, which forms a kind of “sacred history” beyond the biblical framework. Philo of Alexandria’s view of the unity of the laws of nature and the written legislation of Moses as having a single source - the Logos of God, Eusebius extends to the conformity of the biblical character and the contemporary historical figure of the emperor. Following the Logos, Constantine performs the same pattern Moses fulfilled in his life. In the development of the typological line of Moses-Constantine, three moments of the formation of the figure of Constantine in sacred history are traced: receiving the kingdom, accepting the ministry of the priesthood, and gaining the gift of prophecy. The descriptive convergence of the biblical story and modern (to the author) history means not so much the dependence of one narrative on the other but their general dependence on the Logos acting in history as the Law of nature, which guides the course of history and shapes its events. Eusebius reflects in the biography of the emperor the Principle, which equally acts both in the sacred events of the history of Moses and in the relatively recent events for Eusebius Constantine. In this single Beginning, the biblical story, perceived “by ear” and therefore having the “look of a myth”, acquires visible features, and current reality is endowed with the meaning of the sacred biblical story. The “Life of Constantine” thus demonstrates the mechanism of fixation in the memory of sacred events that make up a particular, sacred line of history.","PeriodicalId":40777,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta-Seriya I-Bogoslovie-Filosofiya-Religiovedenie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta-Seriya I-Bogoslovie-Filosofiya-Religiovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturi2023109.9-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article, the conceptual model of the holy emperor in one of the first monuments of Christian hagiographic literature, “Life Constantine” by Eusebius of Caesarea, is investigated. The analysis is based on the typological comparison of Emperor Constantine with the biblical figure of Moses, conducted by Eusebius. As part of this comparison, the development of a “sacred image” in history is traced, which forms a kind of “sacred history” beyond the biblical framework. Philo of Alexandria’s view of the unity of the laws of nature and the written legislation of Moses as having a single source - the Logos of God, Eusebius extends to the conformity of the biblical character and the contemporary historical figure of the emperor. Following the Logos, Constantine performs the same pattern Moses fulfilled in his life. In the development of the typological line of Moses-Constantine, three moments of the formation of the figure of Constantine in sacred history are traced: receiving the kingdom, accepting the ministry of the priesthood, and gaining the gift of prophecy. The descriptive convergence of the biblical story and modern (to the author) history means not so much the dependence of one narrative on the other but their general dependence on the Logos acting in history as the Law of nature, which guides the course of history and shapes its events. Eusebius reflects in the biography of the emperor the Principle, which equally acts both in the sacred events of the history of Moses and in the relatively recent events for Eusebius Constantine. In this single Beginning, the biblical story, perceived “by ear” and therefore having the “look of a myth”, acquires visible features, and current reality is endowed with the meaning of the sacred biblical story. The “Life of Constantine” thus demonstrates the mechanism of fixation in the memory of sacred events that make up a particular, sacred line of history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
凯撒利亚的优西比乌斯的《君士坦丁的一生》作为“神圣的历史”:摩西-君士坦丁的类型学
在本文中,神圣的皇帝的概念模型在基督教的最早的纪念碑之一,凯撒利亚的优西比乌斯的《君士坦丁生活》中进行了研究。这一分析是基于尤西比乌斯对君士坦丁皇帝与圣经人物摩西的类型比较。作为这种比较的一部分,追溯了“神圣形象”在历史上的发展,形成了一种超越圣经框架的“神圣历史”。亚历山德里亚的菲罗认为自然法则和摩西的书面立法是统一的,有一个单一的来源——上帝的逻各斯,优西比乌斯延伸到圣经人物和当代历史人物皇帝的一致性。遵循道,君士坦丁在他的生活中完成了与摩西相同的模式。在摩西-君士坦丁的类型线的发展中,君士坦丁在神圣历史上的形象形成有三个时刻:接受王国,接受祭司的职务,获得预言的礼物。圣经故事和现代历史(对作者而言)的描述性趋同并不意味着一种叙述对另一种叙述的依赖,而是它们对逻各斯的普遍依赖,逻各斯在历史中作为自然法则发挥作用,引导历史进程,塑造历史事件。优西比乌斯在皇帝的传记中反映了这一原则,这一原则在摩西历史上的神圣事件和优西比乌斯·君士坦丁相对较近的事件中同样起作用。在这个单一的开端中,圣经故事被“用耳朵”感知,因此具有“神话的外观”,获得了可见的特征,而当前的现实被赋予了神圣的圣经故事的意义。因此,《君士坦丁的一生》展示了对神圣事件记忆的固定机制,这些事件构成了一条特殊的、神圣的历史路线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Wise priest”: dominant agent in the religious field The global history of religion: back to the future? “The first experience of a civil memorial service”: the mourning morning at the Moscow art theatre 13 February 1910 The problem of personalism in linguophilosophy of revd. Pavel Florensky: modern receptions M. M. Tareev’s kenotic ecclesiology: an attempt at a reconstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1