“The Dream Team:” A Case Study of Teamwork in Higher Education

Tashieka S. Burris-Melville, Shalieka T. Burris
{"title":"“The Dream Team:” A Case Study of Teamwork in Higher Education","authors":"Tashieka S. Burris-Melville, Shalieka T. Burris","doi":"10.5430/jct.v12n6p39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The integration of collaborative practices in essay writing within higher education constitutes a pivotal advantage, frequently producing outcomes surpassing those of independent composition endeavors. However, although collaboration is necessary and can yield many positive outcomes, a collaborative effort is not always successful. A paucity of empirical studies has highlighted the causes of the dysfunctions of teamwork in Jamaica. In higher education, participants often express frustration and unwillingness to engage in teamwork because of the various dysfunctions they are likely to experience. Consequently, in response to this gap, this case study explored both functional and dysfunctional attributes Academic Writing participants encountered at a university in Jamaica, as they worked collaboratively to complete their expository and argumentative essays. This mixed methods study collected data from interviews, peer reviews, and a questionnaire. The findings identified both functional and dysfunctional qualities. The results showed that the major functional attributes were clear communication, respect, commitment, and accountability. The main dysfunctional attributes were lack of trust, miscommunication, commitment, disrespect, and limited time management skills. Finally, this paper highlights best practices that educators can use to create and promote functional and effective teams in the teaching and learning environment.","PeriodicalId":484447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of curriculum and teaching","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of curriculum and teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v12n6p39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of collaborative practices in essay writing within higher education constitutes a pivotal advantage, frequently producing outcomes surpassing those of independent composition endeavors. However, although collaboration is necessary and can yield many positive outcomes, a collaborative effort is not always successful. A paucity of empirical studies has highlighted the causes of the dysfunctions of teamwork in Jamaica. In higher education, participants often express frustration and unwillingness to engage in teamwork because of the various dysfunctions they are likely to experience. Consequently, in response to this gap, this case study explored both functional and dysfunctional attributes Academic Writing participants encountered at a university in Jamaica, as they worked collaboratively to complete their expository and argumentative essays. This mixed methods study collected data from interviews, peer reviews, and a questionnaire. The findings identified both functional and dysfunctional qualities. The results showed that the major functional attributes were clear communication, respect, commitment, and accountability. The main dysfunctional attributes were lack of trust, miscommunication, commitment, disrespect, and limited time management skills. Finally, this paper highlights best practices that educators can use to create and promote functional and effective teams in the teaching and learning environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“梦之队”:高等教育团队合作案例研究
在高等教育中,论文写作的合作实践的整合构成了一个关键的优势,经常产生超过那些独立写作努力的结果。然而,尽管协作是必要的,并且可以产生许多积极的结果,但协作努力并不总是成功的。经验研究的缺乏突出了牙买加团队合作功能失调的原因。在高等教育中,参与者经常表现出沮丧和不愿意参与团队合作,因为他们可能会经历各种功能障碍。因此,为了应对这一差距,本案例研究探讨了学术写作参与者在牙买加一所大学合作完成说明文和议论文时遇到的功能和功能失调属性。这项混合方法的研究收集了来自访谈、同行评议和问卷调查的数据。研究结果确定了功能和功能失调的品质。结果表明,主要的功能属性是清晰的沟通、尊重、承诺和责任。主要的功能失调特征是缺乏信任、沟通不畅、承诺、不尊重和有限的时间管理技能。最后,本文强调了教育工作者可以用来在教学环境中创建和促进功能和有效的团队的最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meta-Analysis of Coefficient Alpha: Empirical Demonstration Using English Language Teaching Reflection Inventory Investigating Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Apps: Babbel, Memrise, and Duolingo as a Case Study Perceptions of Chinese University English Majors on the Use of WeChat as a Platform for Peer Feedback in English Writing Saudi EFL Students’ Perceptions Towards the Impact of YouTube on Improving Speaking Skills Management of Mathematics Learning Based on Interactive Digital Worksheets to Improve Students' Critical Thinking Ability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1