Meta-Analysis of Coefficient Alpha: Empirical Demonstration Using English Language Teaching Reflection Inventory

Bahrul Hayat
{"title":"Meta-Analysis of Coefficient Alpha: Empirical Demonstration Using English Language Teaching Reflection Inventory","authors":"Bahrul Hayat","doi":"10.5430/jct.v13n2p231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cronbach’s alpha is a reliability coefficient commonly reported in second language (L2) and English language teaching (ELT) studies. The alpha coefficient provides information on the internal consistency of a measuring instrument. The reported alpha coefficients are obtained from, and apply only to, the research sample. However, the estimation of the alpha coefficient for the population has not received the attention of L2 and ELT researchers. This study aims to provide an overview of the alpha coefficient estimation procedure of a measuring instrument for a population with the reliability generalization method, commonly known as alpha coefficient meta-analysis. An example alpha coefficient meta-analysis study—using empirical data of the 29-item English Language Teaching Reflection Inventory (ELTRI) from 27 independent study samples—was conducted to provide an overview of the procedure for applying the method and the information that needs to be reported from the results of the analysis. The results of the study using a random-effect model show that the population alpha of ELTRI was 0.872, indicating excellent reliability; this is followed by application of a mixed-effect model that shows that article type and means of teaching experience significantly impacted ELTRI reliability. Implications for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":484447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of curriculum and teaching","volume":" September","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of curriculum and teaching","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n2p231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cronbach’s alpha is a reliability coefficient commonly reported in second language (L2) and English language teaching (ELT) studies. The alpha coefficient provides information on the internal consistency of a measuring instrument. The reported alpha coefficients are obtained from, and apply only to, the research sample. However, the estimation of the alpha coefficient for the population has not received the attention of L2 and ELT researchers. This study aims to provide an overview of the alpha coefficient estimation procedure of a measuring instrument for a population with the reliability generalization method, commonly known as alpha coefficient meta-analysis. An example alpha coefficient meta-analysis study—using empirical data of the 29-item English Language Teaching Reflection Inventory (ELTRI) from 27 independent study samples—was conducted to provide an overview of the procedure for applying the method and the information that needs to be reported from the results of the analysis. The results of the study using a random-effect model show that the population alpha of ELTRI was 0.872, indicating excellent reliability; this is followed by application of a mixed-effect model that shows that article type and means of teaching experience significantly impacted ELTRI reliability. Implications for future research are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系数 Alpha 的元分析:使用英语教学反思量表的经验证明
Cronbach's alpha 是第二语言(L2)和英语教学(ELT)研究中常用的信度系数。α系数提供了测量工具内部一致性的信息。所报告的 α 系数是从研究样本中获得的,并且只适用于研究样本。然而,对总体的 alpha 系数的估计尚未引起语言学习和英语语言教学研究人员的重视。本研究旨在用信度泛化法(即通常所说的α系数元分析法)概述群体测量工具的α系数估计程序。我们利用来自 27 个独立研究样本的 29 个项目的英语教学反思量表(ELTRI)的经验数据,进行了一项α系数元分析实例研究,以概述该方法的应用程序以及分析结果中需要报告的信息。使用随机效应模型的研究结果表明,ELTRI的总体α值为0.872,表明信度极佳;随后应用混合效应模型表明,文章类型和教学经验手段对ELTRI的信度有显著影响。本文讨论了未来研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meta-Analysis of Coefficient Alpha: Empirical Demonstration Using English Language Teaching Reflection Inventory Investigating Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Apps: Babbel, Memrise, and Duolingo as a Case Study Perceptions of Chinese University English Majors on the Use of WeChat as a Platform for Peer Feedback in English Writing Saudi EFL Students’ Perceptions Towards the Impact of YouTube on Improving Speaking Skills Management of Mathematics Learning Based on Interactive Digital Worksheets to Improve Students' Critical Thinking Ability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1