{"title":"P100 Acceptance, Compliance and Efficacy of Oral Appliance Therapy by Patients Suffering from Sleep Apnoea.","authors":"N Rather, R Shankumar, A Nizamuddin, D Mansfield","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) represents an established risk factor for several medical conditions. The evidence demonstrates that OSA can be effectively treated by an oral appliance. However, there less information about the role of an oral appliance in a clinical care model in terms of uptake and efficacy. This study aimed at examining the efficacy of an intervention in dental public health settings in Melbourne, Australia. Methods Data were collected from the 2018-2021. Participants who fitted inclusions criteria completed two instruments. The Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS) was used to assess the Subjective daytime sleepiness, and the Apnoea Hypopnea Index (AHI) objectively evaluated the severity of OSA. Participants were further asked to self-report felt improvements post intervention. Paired t-tests were used to compare pre-test and the post-test results. Results 34 participants had complete before and after data recorded. The mean age of the final samples of 66.4 (s.d., 14.2), the majority were female (67.7%). Participants unanimously acknowledged improvements after the intervention. Findings also indicated that after the intervention, participants had significantly lower EES scores compared to their baseline scores (6.9 vs 12.7; p<0.001). Regarding the AHI, at post-test, participants had significantly lower AHI scores compared to their baseline scores (13.8 vs. 19.2; p<0.001). Conclusions Present results indicate the use of oral appliance will ultimately benefit public patients who suffer from OSA. After the intervention, there were both objective and subjective improvements in OSA. Thus, findings provide valuable inputs and guidance for the design and implementation for larger efficacy trial.","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Background Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) represents an established risk factor for several medical conditions. The evidence demonstrates that OSA can be effectively treated by an oral appliance. However, there less information about the role of an oral appliance in a clinical care model in terms of uptake and efficacy. This study aimed at examining the efficacy of an intervention in dental public health settings in Melbourne, Australia. Methods Data were collected from the 2018-2021. Participants who fitted inclusions criteria completed two instruments. The Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS) was used to assess the Subjective daytime sleepiness, and the Apnoea Hypopnea Index (AHI) objectively evaluated the severity of OSA. Participants were further asked to self-report felt improvements post intervention. Paired t-tests were used to compare pre-test and the post-test results. Results 34 participants had complete before and after data recorded. The mean age of the final samples of 66.4 (s.d., 14.2), the majority were female (67.7%). Participants unanimously acknowledged improvements after the intervention. Findings also indicated that after the intervention, participants had significantly lower EES scores compared to their baseline scores (6.9 vs 12.7; p<0.001). Regarding the AHI, at post-test, participants had significantly lower AHI scores compared to their baseline scores (13.8 vs. 19.2; p<0.001). Conclusions Present results indicate the use of oral appliance will ultimately benefit public patients who suffer from OSA. After the intervention, there were both objective and subjective improvements in OSA. Thus, findings provide valuable inputs and guidance for the design and implementation for larger efficacy trial.
背景阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是几种医学条件下的既定危险因素。有证据表明,使用口腔器械可以有效地治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。然而,关于口腔矫治器在临床护理模式中的作用,在吸收和疗效方面的信息较少。本研究旨在检查干预在澳大利亚墨尔本牙科公共卫生设置的效果。方法收集2018-2021年的数据。符合纳入标准的参与者完成了两个工具。采用Epworth嗜睡评分(ESS)评价白天主观嗜睡,采用呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)客观评价OSA的严重程度。参与者进一步被要求自我报告干预后的感觉改善。配对t检验用于比较前测和后测结果。结果34例受试者完成了前后数据记录。最终样本的平均年龄为66.4岁(标准差14.2),以女性居多(67.7%)。参与者一致承认干预后情况有所改善。研究结果还表明,干预后,参与者的EES得分显著低于基线得分(6.9 vs 12.7;p&肝移植;0.001)。关于AHI,在测试后,参与者的AHI得分明显低于基线得分(13.8比19.2;p&肝移植;0.001)。结论使用口腔矫治器对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者最终是有益的。干预后,OSA客观和主观均有改善。因此,研究结果为更大规模疗效试验的设计和实施提供了有价值的输入和指导。