Impact of Real-World Implementation of Evidence-Based Insomnia Treatment within a Large Payor-Provider Health System: Initial Provider and Patient-Level Outcomes

Bradley E Karlin, Ryan J Anderson, Jillian M Rung, Charlotte Drury-Gworek, Tyson S Barrett
{"title":"Impact of Real-World Implementation of Evidence-Based Insomnia Treatment within a Large Payor-Provider Health System: Initial Provider and Patient-Level Outcomes","authors":"Bradley E Karlin, Ryan J Anderson, Jillian M Rung, Charlotte Drury-Gworek, Tyson S Barrett","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Insomnia has substantial and wide-ranging negative effects on clinical and functional outcomes and on health care expenditures, yet few individuals receive gold-standard insomnia treatment. The current article examines provider and patient outcomes associated with real-world implementation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I), as part of a pilot initiative designed to establish initial capability for evidence-based insomnia treatment within one of the largest payor-provider systems in the United States.\n \n \n \n Provider training outcomes were assessed using the CBT-I Competency Rating Scale and self-report measures. Patient outcomes were assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9.\n \n \n \n All clinicians (N = 11) achieved competency in CBT-I and reported large increases in knowledge and confidence related to insomnia and insomnia treatment. Clinicians also reported high intention to deliver CBT-I and significant improvements in overall job satisfaction following competency-based CBT-I training. Among all patients who initiated CBT-I (N = 48), mixed effects modeling demonstrated significant reduction in average ISI scores (12.57 to 5.88, SEs = 1.08-1.14). More than two-thirds of patients (68.8%) completed treatment. Among completers of this brief treatment, mean insomnia severity improvement was 71% (Hedges g = 1.56).\n \n \n \n Findings provide support for the feasibility and effectiveness of real-world CBT-I implementation, extending past findings to a private, payor-provider context. Patient and provider-level outcomes suggest the significant opportunity private systems may have in increasing the availability of gold-standard treatment for insomnia.\n","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insomnia has substantial and wide-ranging negative effects on clinical and functional outcomes and on health care expenditures, yet few individuals receive gold-standard insomnia treatment. The current article examines provider and patient outcomes associated with real-world implementation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I), as part of a pilot initiative designed to establish initial capability for evidence-based insomnia treatment within one of the largest payor-provider systems in the United States. Provider training outcomes were assessed using the CBT-I Competency Rating Scale and self-report measures. Patient outcomes were assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. All clinicians (N = 11) achieved competency in CBT-I and reported large increases in knowledge and confidence related to insomnia and insomnia treatment. Clinicians also reported high intention to deliver CBT-I and significant improvements in overall job satisfaction following competency-based CBT-I training. Among all patients who initiated CBT-I (N = 48), mixed effects modeling demonstrated significant reduction in average ISI scores (12.57 to 5.88, SEs = 1.08-1.14). More than two-thirds of patients (68.8%) completed treatment. Among completers of this brief treatment, mean insomnia severity improvement was 71% (Hedges g = 1.56). Findings provide support for the feasibility and effectiveness of real-world CBT-I implementation, extending past findings to a private, payor-provider context. Patient and provider-level outcomes suggest the significant opportunity private systems may have in increasing the availability of gold-standard treatment for insomnia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在大型支付方-提供方医疗系统中实际实施循证失眠治疗的影响:提供方和患者层面的初步结果
失眠会对临床和功能结果以及医疗支出产生巨大而广泛的负面影响,但很少有人接受黄金标准的失眠治疗。本文研究了失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-I)在医疗机构和患者中的实际应用效果,该疗法是一项试点计划的一部分,旨在美国最大的支付方-医疗机构系统中建立以证据为基础的失眠治疗的初步能力。 使用 CBT-I 能力评定量表和自我报告测量方法对提供者的培训结果进行评估。患者疗效采用失眠严重程度指数 (ISI) 和患者健康问卷-9 进行评估。 所有临床医生(N = 11)都达到了 CBT-I 的能力要求,并表示在失眠和失眠治疗的相关知识和信心方面有了很大提高。临床医生还表示,在接受了基于能力的 CBT-I 培训后,他们非常愿意提供 CBT-I,整体工作满意度也有了显著提高。在所有接受 CBT-I 培训的患者中(N = 48),混合效应模型显示 ISI 平均得分显著降低(12.57 分至 5.88 分,SE = 1.08-1.14)。超过三分之二的患者(68.8%)完成了治疗。在完成这种简短治疗的患者中,失眠严重程度的平均改善率为 71%(赫奇斯 g = 1.56)。 研究结果为在现实世界中实施 CBT-I 的可行性和有效性提供了支持,并将过去的研究结果扩展到了私人、支付方-提供方的环境中。患者和医疗服务提供者层面的结果表明,私营系统在提高失眠症黄金标准治疗的可用性方面可能拥有重大机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Central Role of Sulcal Width in the Associations of Sleep Duration and Depression with Cognition in Mid to Late Life Clinical and Financial Significance of Insomnia within a Large Payor-Provider Health System Impact of Real-World Implementation of Evidence-Based Insomnia Treatment within a Large Payor-Provider Health System: Initial Provider and Patient-Level Outcomes Poor Sleep and Inflammatory Gene Expression Among Care Partners of Persons Living with Dementia: A Pilot Trial of a Behavioral Sleep Intervention Sex-Specific Associations Between Habitual Snoring and Cancer Prevalence: Insights from a U.S. Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1