P033 Assessment of Upper Airway Dilator Muscle Function and Collapsibility in People with Multiple Sclerosis with Versus without Sleep Apnea

E Thomas, A Osman, L Calonzo, L Hall, M Agzarian, M Slee
{"title":"P033 Assessment of Upper Airway Dilator Muscle Function and Collapsibility in People with Multiple Sclerosis with Versus without Sleep Apnea","authors":"E Thomas, A Osman, L Calonzo, L Hall, M Agzarian, M Slee","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Upper airway reflex responses to negative pressure are important to prevent upper airway narrowing and closure. Recent evidence indicates ~30% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) have an impaired upper airway dilator reflex response. Thus, the aims of this study were to compare genioglossus muscle reflex responses and upper airway collapsibility in non-obese people with MS, with and without OSA. Methods Non-obese adults with MS and OSA vs MS without OSA were instrumented with pressure sensors at the choanae and epiglottis. Bipolar fine wires were inserted into the genioglossus. A nasal mask and pneumotachograph were attached to a breathing circuit to deliver brief (~250ms) suction pressure (~-12cmH2O) during early inspiration every 2-10 breaths while awake. Genioglossus reflex onset latency, peak latency and peak amplitude were quantified. The upper airway collapsibility index was the percent difference between choanal and epiglottic airway pressures during negative pressure. Results 15 people with MS (6 males), aged 48±13years, BMI=25±3kg/m-2 and AHI=13±17events/h (mean±SD) were studied. 47% had OSA (AHI>10events/h). Genioglossus reflex excitation onset latency (22±2 vs. 24±19ms), peak excitation latency (37±11 vs. 38±23ms) and peak amplitude (258±125 vs. 205±95%) were not different between OSA vs. non-OSA. The upper airway was more collapsible in people with OSA (49±32 vs. 17±16%, p=0.04). Conclusions There is a high prevalence of OSA among non-obese people with MS. There was no systematic difference in upper airway dilator muscle function. However, the upper airway is ~65% more collapsible in people with MS and OSA despite absence of obesity.","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Upper airway reflex responses to negative pressure are important to prevent upper airway narrowing and closure. Recent evidence indicates ~30% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) have an impaired upper airway dilator reflex response. Thus, the aims of this study were to compare genioglossus muscle reflex responses and upper airway collapsibility in non-obese people with MS, with and without OSA. Methods Non-obese adults with MS and OSA vs MS without OSA were instrumented with pressure sensors at the choanae and epiglottis. Bipolar fine wires were inserted into the genioglossus. A nasal mask and pneumotachograph were attached to a breathing circuit to deliver brief (~250ms) suction pressure (~-12cmH2O) during early inspiration every 2-10 breaths while awake. Genioglossus reflex onset latency, peak latency and peak amplitude were quantified. The upper airway collapsibility index was the percent difference between choanal and epiglottic airway pressures during negative pressure. Results 15 people with MS (6 males), aged 48±13years, BMI=25±3kg/m-2 and AHI=13±17events/h (mean±SD) were studied. 47% had OSA (AHI>10events/h). Genioglossus reflex excitation onset latency (22±2 vs. 24±19ms), peak excitation latency (37±11 vs. 38±23ms) and peak amplitude (258±125 vs. 205±95%) were not different between OSA vs. non-OSA. The upper airway was more collapsible in people with OSA (49±32 vs. 17±16%, p=0.04). Conclusions There is a high prevalence of OSA among non-obese people with MS. There was no systematic difference in upper airway dilator muscle function. However, the upper airway is ~65% more collapsible in people with MS and OSA despite absence of obesity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症伴与不伴睡眠呼吸暂停患者上气道扩张肌功能和可折叠性的评估
上呼吸道对负压的反射反应是防止上呼吸道狭窄和关闭的重要因素。最近的证据表明,约30%的多发性硬化症(MS)患者有上呼吸道扩张器反射反应受损。因此,本研究的目的是比较非肥胖多发性硬化症患者(伴和不伴OSA)的颏舌肌反射反应和上呼吸道塌陷性。方法对非肥胖成人多发性硬化症、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停与非阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的多发性硬化症患者在耳道和会厌处安装压力传感器。双极细导线插入颏舌肌。在清醒状态下,每2-10次呼吸,将鼻罩和气描仪连接到呼吸回路上,在早期吸气时提供短暂(~250ms)的吸入压力(~-12cmH2O)。对舌颏反射的起病潜伏期、峰潜伏期和峰幅进行量化。上呼吸道湿陷性指数为负压时后气道与会厌气道压力差的百分比。结果15例MS患者(男6例),年龄48±13岁,BMI=25±3kg/m-2, AHI=13±17events/h (mean±SD)。47%发生OSA (ahi10事件/小时)。舌颏反射兴奋发作潜伏期(22±2 vs. 24±19ms)、兴奋峰潜伏期(37±11 vs. 38±23ms)和峰幅(258±125 vs. 205±95%)在OSA与非OSA之间无显著差异。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的上气道更易折叠(49±32比17±16%,p=0.04)。结论非肥胖多发性硬化症患者存在较高的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患病率,两组患者上气道扩张肌功能无系统性差异。然而,尽管没有肥胖,MS和OSA患者的上呼吸道可折叠性要高出约65%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Central Role of Sulcal Width in the Associations of Sleep Duration and Depression with Cognition in Mid to Late Life Clinical and Financial Significance of Insomnia within a Large Payor-Provider Health System Impact of Real-World Implementation of Evidence-Based Insomnia Treatment within a Large Payor-Provider Health System: Initial Provider and Patient-Level Outcomes Poor Sleep and Inflammatory Gene Expression Among Care Partners of Persons Living with Dementia: A Pilot Trial of a Behavioral Sleep Intervention Sex-Specific Associations Between Habitual Snoring and Cancer Prevalence: Insights from a U.S. Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1