O006 Major adverse cardiovascular events in severe Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: Associations with symptom subtypes and symptom burden

B Shenoy, N McArdle, J Walsh, G Cadby, A Reynor, S Dhaliwal, B McQuillan, D Hillman, J Hung, P Eastwood, S Mukherjee, L Palmer, B Singh
{"title":"O006 Major adverse cardiovascular events in severe Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: Associations with symptom subtypes and symptom burden","authors":"B Shenoy, N McArdle, J Walsh, G Cadby, A Reynor, S Dhaliwal, B McQuillan, D Hillman, J Hung, P Eastwood, S Mukherjee, L Palmer, B Singh","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a heterogeneous disorder with certain phenotypes at increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We investigated whether symptom subtypes and/or symptom burden are useful predictors of MACE risk in severe OSA. Method In a longitudinal sleep clinic cohort with apnoea-hypopnoea index ≥30 events/hour (n=1767), we investigated 19 OSA-related symptoms across four symptom domains (upper airway [UA], insomnia and disturbed sleep, morning, and daytime sleepiness) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score. Latent class analysis identified five symptom subtypes. A symptom burden score (0–8) was developed by selecting the two symptoms from each domain most strongly associated with MACE. Multivariable-adjusted associations of subtypes and symptom burden with future MACE were investigated using Cox regressions. Results Over a median follow-up of 7 years, 18.7% developed MACE. Relative to the moderately sleepy subtype, the disturbed sleep (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.65; 95%CI, 1.15–2.37) and UA symptoms predominant (HR, 1.57; 95%CI, 1.05–2.34) subtypes showed increased MACE risk. There was a graded increase in MACE risk with increasing symptom burden score (adjusted p for linear trend = 0.003). Compared to patients that reported ≤2 of 8 symptoms, those with ≥7 symptoms showed an independent risk for MACE (HR, 1.77; 95%CI, 1.12–2.77). Discussion Both symptom subtypes and symptom burden may help identify severe OSA patients at increased risk of MACE. However, our novel symptom burden score may have more clinical utility as it is an easily calculated summative measure of OSA-related symptoms that allows objective comparisons across diverse patient populations.","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a heterogeneous disorder with certain phenotypes at increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We investigated whether symptom subtypes and/or symptom burden are useful predictors of MACE risk in severe OSA. Method In a longitudinal sleep clinic cohort with apnoea-hypopnoea index ≥30 events/hour (n=1767), we investigated 19 OSA-related symptoms across four symptom domains (upper airway [UA], insomnia and disturbed sleep, morning, and daytime sleepiness) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score. Latent class analysis identified five symptom subtypes. A symptom burden score (0–8) was developed by selecting the two symptoms from each domain most strongly associated with MACE. Multivariable-adjusted associations of subtypes and symptom burden with future MACE were investigated using Cox regressions. Results Over a median follow-up of 7 years, 18.7% developed MACE. Relative to the moderately sleepy subtype, the disturbed sleep (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.65; 95%CI, 1.15–2.37) and UA symptoms predominant (HR, 1.57; 95%CI, 1.05–2.34) subtypes showed increased MACE risk. There was a graded increase in MACE risk with increasing symptom burden score (adjusted p for linear trend = 0.003). Compared to patients that reported ≤2 of 8 symptoms, those with ≥7 symptoms showed an independent risk for MACE (HR, 1.77; 95%CI, 1.12–2.77). Discussion Both symptom subtypes and symptom burden may help identify severe OSA patients at increased risk of MACE. However, our novel symptom burden score may have more clinical utility as it is an easily calculated summative measure of OSA-related symptoms that allows objective comparisons across diverse patient populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严重阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的主要不良心血管事件:与症状亚型和症状负担相关
背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种异质性疾病,具有某些表型,可增加主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的风险。我们研究了症状亚型和/或症状负担是否是严重OSA患者MACE风险的有用预测因子。方法在纵向睡眠临床队列中,呼吸暂停-睡眠不足指数≥30次/小时(n=1767),我们调查了四个症状域(上呼吸道[UA],失眠和睡眠障碍,早晨和白天嗜睡)的19例osa相关症状和Epworth嗜睡量表评分。潜在分类分析确定了五种症状亚型。通过从每个领域中选择与MACE最密切相关的两个症状,制定症状负担评分(0-8)。采用Cox回归研究多变量调整的亚型和症状负担与未来MACE的关系。结果中位随访7年,18.7%发生MACE。相对于中度困倦亚型,睡眠不安组(校正风险比[HR], 1.65;95%CI, 1.15-2.37)和UA症状为主(HR, 1.57;95%CI(1.05-2.34)亚型显示MACE风险增加。随着症状负担评分的增加,MACE风险逐渐增加(线性趋势调整p = 0.003)。与报告8种症状中≤2种的患者相比,症状≥7种的患者出现MACE的独立风险(HR, 1.77;95%可信区间,1.12 - -2.77)。症状亚型和症状负担可能有助于识别MACE风险增加的严重OSA患者。然而,我们的新症状负担评分可能具有更多的临床效用,因为它是一种易于计算的osa相关症状的总结性测量,可以在不同的患者群体中进行客观比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Central Role of Sulcal Width in the Associations of Sleep Duration and Depression with Cognition in Mid to Late Life Clinical and Financial Significance of Insomnia within a Large Payor-Provider Health System Impact of Real-World Implementation of Evidence-Based Insomnia Treatment within a Large Payor-Provider Health System: Initial Provider and Patient-Level Outcomes Poor Sleep and Inflammatory Gene Expression Among Care Partners of Persons Living with Dementia: A Pilot Trial of a Behavioral Sleep Intervention Sex-Specific Associations Between Habitual Snoring and Cancer Prevalence: Insights from a U.S. Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1