O008 Refining the Hypoxic Burden Algorithm by Investigating different Methods for Calculating the SpO2 Baseline

S He, Y Bin, P Cistulli, P de Chazal
{"title":"O008 Refining the Hypoxic Burden Algorithm by Investigating different Methods for Calculating the SpO2 Baseline","authors":"S He, Y Bin, P Cistulli, P de Chazal","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Intermittent hypoxia is a key mechanism linking Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oximetry analysis could enhance understanding of which OSA phenotypes are associated with CVD risk. The hypoxic burden (HB) is a measure calculated from the oximetry signal that shows promise for predicting CVD mortality, but its calculation is complex. With a view to simplifying its calculation, we investigated three different baseline calculation methods and its impact on predicting CVD mortality for the HB algorithm. Methods Data from Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) with CVD mortality outcome and complete covariate information was used. We implemented the HB method of Azarbarzin et al 2018 ERJ. The three baseline methods included an event-based baseline (same as Azarbarzin et al 2018 ERJ), a record-based baseline, and a fixed baseline. The performance of each parameter in predicting CVD mortality was assessed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) analysis. Results The best performing method was the record-based baseline method which returned a fully adjusted model hazard ratio of 1.83 (95% CI: 1.03-3.27, p<0.05). The results for the event-based and record-based baseline methods were 1.60 (95% CI: 0.86-3.00, p=0.14) and 1.73 (95% CI: 0.93-3.22, p=0.08) respectively. Discussion HB with the record-based baseline was easier to calculate than the original event-based baseline method by Azarbarzin at al. and resulted in improved CVD mortality prediction performance. We believe that this method provides a step towards providing a novel parameter with easy calculation providing early risk stratification in cardiovascular patients.","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Intermittent hypoxia is a key mechanism linking Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oximetry analysis could enhance understanding of which OSA phenotypes are associated with CVD risk. The hypoxic burden (HB) is a measure calculated from the oximetry signal that shows promise for predicting CVD mortality, but its calculation is complex. With a view to simplifying its calculation, we investigated three different baseline calculation methods and its impact on predicting CVD mortality for the HB algorithm. Methods Data from Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) with CVD mortality outcome and complete covariate information was used. We implemented the HB method of Azarbarzin et al 2018 ERJ. The three baseline methods included an event-based baseline (same as Azarbarzin et al 2018 ERJ), a record-based baseline, and a fixed baseline. The performance of each parameter in predicting CVD mortality was assessed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) analysis. Results The best performing method was the record-based baseline method which returned a fully adjusted model hazard ratio of 1.83 (95% CI: 1.03-3.27, p<0.05). The results for the event-based and record-based baseline methods were 1.60 (95% CI: 0.86-3.00, p=0.14) and 1.73 (95% CI: 0.93-3.22, p=0.08) respectively. Discussion HB with the record-based baseline was easier to calculate than the original event-based baseline method by Azarbarzin at al. and resulted in improved CVD mortality prediction performance. We believe that this method provides a step towards providing a novel parameter with easy calculation providing early risk stratification in cardiovascular patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[008]通过研究不同SpO2基线计算方法来改进缺氧负荷算法
间歇性缺氧是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与心血管疾病(CVD)相关的重要机制。血氧饱和度分析有助于了解哪些OSA表型与CVD风险相关。低氧负荷(HB)是一种由血氧测量信号计算出来的指标,有望预测心血管疾病的死亡率,但其计算比较复杂。为了简化其计算,我们研究了三种不同的基线计算方法及其对HB算法预测心血管疾病死亡率的影响。方法采用睡眠心脏健康研究(SHHS)的数据,包括CVD死亡结局和完整的协变量信息。我们实现了Azarbarzin et al 2018 ERJ的HB方法。三种基线方法包括基于事件的基线(与Azarbarzin et al . 2018 ERJ相同)、基于记录的基线和固定基线。采用调整后的Cox比例风险比(HR)分析评估各参数在预测心血管疾病死亡率方面的表现。结果以记录基线法为最佳方法,其校正后的模型风险比为1.83 (95% CI: 1.03-3.27, p<0.05)。事件基线法和记录基线法的结果分别为1.60 (95% CI: 0.86-3.00, p=0.14)和1.73 (95% CI: 0.93-3.22, p=0.08)。与Azarbarzin等人最初的基于事件的基线方法相比,基于记录基线的HB更容易计算,并导致CVD死亡率预测性能的提高。我们相信,这种方法为提供一个易于计算的新参数提供了一步,为心血管患者提供了早期风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Central Role of Sulcal Width in the Associations of Sleep Duration and Depression with Cognition in Mid to Late Life Clinical and Financial Significance of Insomnia within a Large Payor-Provider Health System Impact of Real-World Implementation of Evidence-Based Insomnia Treatment within a Large Payor-Provider Health System: Initial Provider and Patient-Level Outcomes Poor Sleep and Inflammatory Gene Expression Among Care Partners of Persons Living with Dementia: A Pilot Trial of a Behavioral Sleep Intervention Sex-Specific Associations Between Habitual Snoring and Cancer Prevalence: Insights from a U.S. Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1