Vaccine uptake and effectiveness: Why some African countries performed better than the others?

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Policy and Technology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100820
Aregawi G. Gebremariam , Dereje Abegaz , Halefom Y. Nigus , Thomas Lemma Argaw , Mulusew Gerbaba , Mesfin G. Genie , Francesco Paolucci
{"title":"Vaccine uptake and effectiveness: Why some African countries performed better than the others?","authors":"Aregawi G. Gebremariam ,&nbsp;Dereje Abegaz ,&nbsp;Halefom Y. Nigus ,&nbsp;Thomas Lemma Argaw ,&nbsp;Mulusew Gerbaba ,&nbsp;Mesfin G. Genie ,&nbsp;Francesco Paolucci","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study examines the factors influencing vaccination rollout and its effectiveness in reducing infectious disease outbreaks in African countries. It aims to understand why some countries performed better in vaccination coverage than others and explores the impact of COVID-19 vaccinations in conjunction with the stringency index in Africa.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two data sources were utilized. Firstly, a scoping review of relevant studies and gray literature was conducted using the Arksey H &amp; O'Malley L methodological framework. Additionally, data from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT dataset) were analysed to explore the effect of COVID-19 vaccines in Africa. Regression discontinuity in time was employed to assess the effects of COVID-19 vaccination on new COVID-19 cases, deaths, and reproduction rate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study found that the number of vaccinated individuals increased from March 2021, while the stringency index steadily declined since January 2021. Despite higher vaccination coverage, new COVID-19 cases and deaths peaked in late 2021 and early 2022, indicating the continued need for non-pharmaceutical interventions. After considering country fixed effects and other covariates, the number of new cases and deaths were negatively associated with the stringency index and vaccine introduction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>COVID-19 vaccination was shown to be crucial in reducing new cases and deaths in Africa. However, vaccination progress in the region remains low and is influenced by factors at both structural and micro levels. Further research is required to disentangle the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions and other measures from vaccination campaigns in the context of Africa while accounting for other contributing factors.</p></div><div><h3>Lay summary</h3><p>This study aimed to understand why some African countries did better than others in their COVID-19 vaccination efforts and how these vaccinations affected the spread of the virus. Researchers reviewed existing studies and government data along with the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. While vaccinations increased from March 2021 and strict measures eased from January 2021, new cases and deaths remained high in late 2021 and early 2022, indicating the need for additional measures. Stricter government actions and higher vaccination rates were linked to fewer cases and deaths. In Africa, COVID-19 vaccinations are crucial, but progress is slow due to various factors at both macro and individual levels. Further research is required to understand the interplay between vaccinations, other measures, and controlling the virus.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100820"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883723000965/pdfft?md5=6857a4cb753d8a8b637fbf7f6a9cb6ca&pid=1-s2.0-S2211883723000965-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883723000965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study examines the factors influencing vaccination rollout and its effectiveness in reducing infectious disease outbreaks in African countries. It aims to understand why some countries performed better in vaccination coverage than others and explores the impact of COVID-19 vaccinations in conjunction with the stringency index in Africa.

Methods

Two data sources were utilized. Firstly, a scoping review of relevant studies and gray literature was conducted using the Arksey H & O'Malley L methodological framework. Additionally, data from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT dataset) were analysed to explore the effect of COVID-19 vaccines in Africa. Regression discontinuity in time was employed to assess the effects of COVID-19 vaccination on new COVID-19 cases, deaths, and reproduction rate.

Results

The study found that the number of vaccinated individuals increased from March 2021, while the stringency index steadily declined since January 2021. Despite higher vaccination coverage, new COVID-19 cases and deaths peaked in late 2021 and early 2022, indicating the continued need for non-pharmaceutical interventions. After considering country fixed effects and other covariates, the number of new cases and deaths were negatively associated with the stringency index and vaccine introduction.

Conclusion

COVID-19 vaccination was shown to be crucial in reducing new cases and deaths in Africa. However, vaccination progress in the region remains low and is influenced by factors at both structural and micro levels. Further research is required to disentangle the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions and other measures from vaccination campaigns in the context of Africa while accounting for other contributing factors.

Lay summary

This study aimed to understand why some African countries did better than others in their COVID-19 vaccination efforts and how these vaccinations affected the spread of the virus. Researchers reviewed existing studies and government data along with the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. While vaccinations increased from March 2021 and strict measures eased from January 2021, new cases and deaths remained high in late 2021 and early 2022, indicating the need for additional measures. Stricter government actions and higher vaccination rates were linked to fewer cases and deaths. In Africa, COVID-19 vaccinations are crucial, but progress is slow due to various factors at both macro and individual levels. Further research is required to understand the interplay between vaccinations, other measures, and controlling the virus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疫苗接种率和有效性:为什么一些非洲国家的表现优于其他国家?
目标本研究探讨了影响疫苗接种推广的因素及其在减少非洲国家传染病爆发方面的有效性。研究旨在了解为什么一些国家的疫苗接种覆盖率高于其他国家,并结合严格指数探讨 COVID-19 疫苗接种在非洲的影响。首先,采用 Arksey H & O'Malley L 方法框架对相关研究和灰色文献进行了范围界定。此外,研究人员还分析了牛津 COVID-19 政府响应追踪系统(OxCGRT 数据集)的数据,以探讨 COVID-19 疫苗在非洲的影响。研究发现,接种疫苗的人数从 2021 年 3 月开始增加,而接种疫苗的严格指数从 2021 年 1 月开始稳步下降。尽管疫苗接种覆盖率有所提高,但 COVID-19 新发病例和死亡人数在 2021 年底和 2022 年初达到高峰,这表明仍然需要采取非药物干预措施。在考虑了国家固定效应和其他协变量后,新增病例和死亡人数与严格指数和疫苗引入呈负相关。然而,该地区的疫苗接种进展仍然较低,并受到结构和微观层面因素的影响。需要进一步开展研究,以便在考虑其他因素的同时,将非药物干预措施和其他措施的效果与非洲的疫苗接种活动区分开来。 本研究旨在了解为什么一些非洲国家的 COVID-19 疫苗接种工作做得比其他国家好,以及这些疫苗接种如何影响病毒的传播。研究人员回顾了现有的研究和政府数据,以及牛津 COVID-19 政府响应追踪系统。虽然疫苗接种从 2021 年 3 月开始增加,严格措施从 2021 年 1 月开始放宽,但 2021 年底和 2022 年初的新增病例和死亡人数仍然居高不下,这表明有必要采取更多措施。更严格的政府行动和更高的疫苗接种率与病例和死亡人数减少有关。在非洲,COVID-19 疫苗接种至关重要,但由于宏观和个人层面的各种因素,进展缓慢。要了解疫苗接种、其他措施和病毒控制之间的相互作用,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
期刊最新文献
Challenges of shared decision-making in virtual care: Whom should we care for, and how? Individual factors that affect laypeople's understanding of definitions of medical jargon An insight into the implementation, utilization, and evaluation of telemedicine e-consultation services in Egypt Multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework “MARIE” for new drugs Assessing contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on healthcare provider burnout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1