{"title":"Multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework “MARIE” for new drugs","authors":"Akina Takami , Masafumi Kato , Hisato Deguchi , Ataru Igarashi","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Value-based pricing (VBP) could improve allocation of healthcare resources. We created and evaluated a simple VBP method that qualitatively considers broad values for drugs.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>First, we established the value elements that determine the value of drugs. Then, we decided on the criteria for scoring the value elements, constructed a method for estimating daily drug prices from the value elements and the maximum number of patients, and used this framework to estimate daily drug prices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four base value elements and 8 additional elements were identified. We applied our scoring criteria to calculate scores for 39 drugs already listed in Japan and estimated the daily drug price of each drug by creating a conversion table of base drug prices according to base points and maximum number of patients and adding points for additional elements. For all hepatitis C drugs, the estimated daily drug prices were lower than the actual prices, whereas for the other drugs, they were higher or, in some cases, lower.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our VBP framework comprises 4 steps: 1. gathering information on value elements; 2. scoring value elements; 3. calculating the base drug price from the base points and the maximum number of patients by using the conversion table; and 4. calculating the daily drug price by adding points for additional value elements. Our framework, which we refer to as MARIE (multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework), is a versatile, practical, and simple option for pricing new drugs that can be easily adapted to different healthcare environments.</div></div><div><h3>Public Interest Summary</h3><div>Drug prices do not necessarily reflect the values provided by drugs in Japanese current drug pricing system. It is not fully discussed how to quantify the value of drugs for prices by considering a broad range of value elements. We created and evaluated VBP method for drug pricing that would be applicable in Japan considering the current pharmaceutical regulations, medical environment, and availability of data at the timing of pricing negotiation process for new drugs. The study summarizes the value elements to be considered in determining drug prices and proposed VBP framework. It also revealed that qualitative factors can be used for drug pricing. Our proposed approach for drug pricing system enables to capture and reflect broader values of new drug.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100928"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Value-based pricing (VBP) could improve allocation of healthcare resources. We created and evaluated a simple VBP method that qualitatively considers broad values for drugs.
Method
First, we established the value elements that determine the value of drugs. Then, we decided on the criteria for scoring the value elements, constructed a method for estimating daily drug prices from the value elements and the maximum number of patients, and used this framework to estimate daily drug prices.
Results
Four base value elements and 8 additional elements were identified. We applied our scoring criteria to calculate scores for 39 drugs already listed in Japan and estimated the daily drug price of each drug by creating a conversion table of base drug prices according to base points and maximum number of patients and adding points for additional elements. For all hepatitis C drugs, the estimated daily drug prices were lower than the actual prices, whereas for the other drugs, they were higher or, in some cases, lower.
Conclusion
Our VBP framework comprises 4 steps: 1. gathering information on value elements; 2. scoring value elements; 3. calculating the base drug price from the base points and the maximum number of patients by using the conversion table; and 4. calculating the daily drug price by adding points for additional value elements. Our framework, which we refer to as MARIE (multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework), is a versatile, practical, and simple option for pricing new drugs that can be easily adapted to different healthcare environments.
Public Interest Summary
Drug prices do not necessarily reflect the values provided by drugs in Japanese current drug pricing system. It is not fully discussed how to quantify the value of drugs for prices by considering a broad range of value elements. We created and evaluated VBP method for drug pricing that would be applicable in Japan considering the current pharmaceutical regulations, medical environment, and availability of data at the timing of pricing negotiation process for new drugs. The study summarizes the value elements to be considered in determining drug prices and proposed VBP framework. It also revealed that qualitative factors can be used for drug pricing. Our proposed approach for drug pricing system enables to capture and reflect broader values of new drug.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics