Optimal investment in health when lifetime is stochastic, or, rational agents do not often follow health recommendations

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Southern Economic Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1002/soej.12656
Kristian Bolin, Michael R. Caputo
{"title":"Optimal investment in health when lifetime is stochastic, or, rational agents do not often follow health recommendations","authors":"Kristian Bolin, Michael R. Caputo","doi":"10.1002/soej.12656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There exists considerable evidence that people do not often follow the health recommendations issued by health authorities. It might be tempting to think that not following health recommendations is a sign of irrationality and that behavioral considerations are required in order to explain such behavior. Despite this temptation, and using a general health‐capital model which accounts for the consumption of many goods, a stock of health and investment in it, as well as an agent's random lifetime and accumulation of wealth, it is shown that such seemingly irrational decisions are in fact consistent with rational, forward‐looking, decision making. Moreover, it is shown, among other things, that the prototypical assumptions employed in the literature imply that rational agents invest more in their health at each point in time than that which minimizes the conditional probability of dying at that point in time, and thus lack sufficient explanatory reach.","PeriodicalId":47946,"journal":{"name":"Southern Economic Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract There exists considerable evidence that people do not often follow the health recommendations issued by health authorities. It might be tempting to think that not following health recommendations is a sign of irrationality and that behavioral considerations are required in order to explain such behavior. Despite this temptation, and using a general health‐capital model which accounts for the consumption of many goods, a stock of health and investment in it, as well as an agent's random lifetime and accumulation of wealth, it is shown that such seemingly irrational decisions are in fact consistent with rational, forward‐looking, decision making. Moreover, it is shown, among other things, that the prototypical assumptions employed in the literature imply that rational agents invest more in their health at each point in time than that which minimizes the conditional probability of dying at that point in time, and thus lack sufficient explanatory reach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当寿命是随机的,或者理性的代理人通常不遵循健康建议时,对健康的最佳投资
有相当多的证据表明,人们并不经常遵循卫生当局发布的健康建议。人们可能很容易认为,不遵循健康建议是一种非理性的表现,为了解释这种行为,需要考虑行为。尽管存在这种诱惑,但使用一个通用的健康资本模型(该模型考虑了许多商品的消费、健康库存和投资,以及代理人的随机寿命和财富积累),结果表明,这些看似非理性的决策实际上与理性的、前瞻性的决策是一致的。此外,除其他事项外,文献中采用的原型假设表明,理性行为者在每个时间点对其健康的投资大于将该时间点死亡的条件概率最小化的投资,因此缺乏足够的解释范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Theme park rides are Giffen goods The fourth industrial revolution and the future of work: Reasons to worry and policies to consider Exploring the corruption‐inefficiency nexus using an endogenous stochastic frontier analysis How the Federal Reserve got so huge, and why and how it can shrink The case for nominal GDP level targeting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1