The fourth industrial revolution and the future of work: Reasons to worry and policies to consider

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Southern Economic Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1002/soej.12714
Arthur H. Goldsmith, Jackson T. Stephens, James F. Casey
{"title":"The fourth industrial revolution and the future of work: Reasons to worry and policies to consider","authors":"Arthur H. Goldsmith, Jackson T. Stephens, James F. Casey","doi":"10.1002/soej.12714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A striking feature of the contemporary U.S. economy is the widespread adoption of technologies associated with the 4th Industrial Revolution (IR) including sensors, industrial robotics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. Empirical work investigating the labor market impacts of 4th IR technological advances reveals they are skill‐biased, primarily advancing job opportunities for those with high levels of formal of education, unlike prior industrial revolutions that were skill neutral. This paper explains how the 4th IR has fostered job polarization, greater technological unemployment, and increasing wage inequality. Moreover, we delineate why these developments are worrisome and likely to expand over time. We assert that policy intervention to promote reinstatement of technologically unemployed persons is warranted, because displacement of labor caused by automation creates negative externalities. Consequently, we provide an example of how tax policies could be used to curtail technological unemployment—without creating hurdles for the adoption of 4th IR innovations. We advance and describe a new, innovative way, for fiscal policy to foster employment opportunities for those at greatest risk of job loss through automation. The initiative entails government subsidies to promote the provision and acquisition of skill certificates that employers view as complementary with 4th Industrial Revolution Technologies.","PeriodicalId":47946,"journal":{"name":"Southern Economic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A striking feature of the contemporary U.S. economy is the widespread adoption of technologies associated with the 4th Industrial Revolution (IR) including sensors, industrial robotics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. Empirical work investigating the labor market impacts of 4th IR technological advances reveals they are skill‐biased, primarily advancing job opportunities for those with high levels of formal of education, unlike prior industrial revolutions that were skill neutral. This paper explains how the 4th IR has fostered job polarization, greater technological unemployment, and increasing wage inequality. Moreover, we delineate why these developments are worrisome and likely to expand over time. We assert that policy intervention to promote reinstatement of technologically unemployed persons is warranted, because displacement of labor caused by automation creates negative externalities. Consequently, we provide an example of how tax policies could be used to curtail technological unemployment—without creating hurdles for the adoption of 4th IR innovations. We advance and describe a new, innovative way, for fiscal policy to foster employment opportunities for those at greatest risk of job loss through automation. The initiative entails government subsidies to promote the provision and acquisition of skill certificates that employers view as complementary with 4th Industrial Revolution Technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第四次工业革命和未来的工作:担忧的理由和需要考虑的政策
当代美国经济的一个显著特点是广泛采用与第四次工业革命(IR)相关的技术,包括传感器、工业机器人、人工智能和机器学习。调查第四次工业革命技术进步对劳动力市场影响的实证研究表明,这些技术进步具有技能偏见,主要是为那些受过高等教育的人提供了更多的就业机会,而不像以前的工业革命那样对技能没有影响。本文解释了第四次工业革命如何导致就业两极分化、技术性失业增加和工资不平等加剧。此外,我们还阐述了为什么这些发展令人担忧,并有可能随着时间的推移而扩大。我们认为,有必要采取政策干预措施,促进技术性失业人员重新就业,因为自动化导致的劳动力转移会产生负面的外部效应。因此,我们提供了一个例子,说明如何利用税收政策来减少技术性失业--同时又不给采用第四代 IR 创新技术制造障碍。我们提出并描述了一种新的创新方法,即通过财政政策为那些因自动化而面临最大失业风险的人创造就业机会。这一举措需要政府提供补贴,以促进提供和获取雇主认为与第四次工业革命技术相辅相成的技能证书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Theme park rides are Giffen goods The fourth industrial revolution and the future of work: Reasons to worry and policies to consider Exploring the corruption‐inefficiency nexus using an endogenous stochastic frontier analysis How the Federal Reserve got so huge, and why and how it can shrink The case for nominal GDP level targeting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1