The Common Framework and its Discontents

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Development and Change Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1111/dech.12787
Brad W. Setser
{"title":"The Common Framework and its Discontents","authors":"Brad W. Setser","doi":"10.1111/dech.12787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The Common Framework is the internationally agreed process for coordinating the restructuring of the debt of low-income countries. To date, this process, which was established by the G20 in late 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, has failed to provide an efficient path toward agreement with new bilateral creditors (such as China), market creditors and the traditional bilateral creditors. An analysis of the key country cases demonstrates how tensions between different creditors have complicated the application of the Common Framework and delayed agreement on new financial terms. The Common Framework was built on a case-by-case judgement of the scale of debt relief needed. It has become a case-by-case negotiation on the format for carrying out a restructuring, as well as the terms of the restructuring. China's participation in official creditor committees, the clear innovation in the Common Framework, has proved to be a source of delay rather than a mechanism for creating consensus. Almost three years after the initial agreement on the Common Framework, there still is no model for an internationally coordinated restructuring that both delivers significant debt relief and includes the Chinese policy banks.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":"54 5","pages":"1065-1086"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12787","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Common Framework is the internationally agreed process for coordinating the restructuring of the debt of low-income countries. To date, this process, which was established by the G20 in late 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, has failed to provide an efficient path toward agreement with new bilateral creditors (such as China), market creditors and the traditional bilateral creditors. An analysis of the key country cases demonstrates how tensions between different creditors have complicated the application of the Common Framework and delayed agreement on new financial terms. The Common Framework was built on a case-by-case judgement of the scale of debt relief needed. It has become a case-by-case negotiation on the format for carrying out a restructuring, as well as the terms of the restructuring. China's participation in official creditor committees, the clear innovation in the Common Framework, has proved to be a source of delay rather than a mechanism for creating consensus. Almost three years after the initial agreement on the Common Framework, there still is no model for an internationally coordinated restructuring that both delivers significant debt relief and includes the Chinese policy banks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同框架及其不满
共同框架是国际商定的协调低收入国家债务重组的进程。到目前为止,这一由二十国集团在2020年底新冠肺炎大流行期间建立的进程,未能为与新的双边债权人(如中国)、市场债权人和传统双边债权人达成协议提供有效途径。对关键国家案例的分析表明,不同债权人之间的紧张关系如何使共同框架的适用复杂化,并推迟了就新的财政条件达成协议。共同框架是建立在对所需的债务减免规模逐案判断的基础上的。它已成为就进行改组的形式以及改组的条件进行逐案谈判。中国参与官方债权人委员会(共同框架的明显创新),已被证明是拖延的根源,而不是创造共识的机制。在《共同框架》初步达成协议近三年后,仍未出现一种既能大幅减免债务,又包括中国政策性银行的国际协调重组模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Development and Change
Development and Change DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The World Bank and Rural Land Titling in Africa: The Case of Tanzania Discourses of Land Conflicts in Indonesia Negotiating Urban Development in Africa: Transnational Communities of Embedded Support in Dar es Salaam The Political Economy of Variations in Energy Debt Financing by Two Chinese Policy Banks in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1