Comparison of advanced echocardiographic right ventricular functional parameters with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adult congenital heart disease
Daniel J Bowen, Robert M Kauling, Chiara Pelosi, Lourus van Haveren, Jackie S McGhie, Judith A A E Cuypers, Alexander Hirsch, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink, Annemien E van den Bosch
{"title":"Comparison of advanced echocardiographic right ventricular functional parameters with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adult congenital heart disease","authors":"Daniel J Bowen, Robert M Kauling, Chiara Pelosi, Lourus van Haveren, Jackie S McGhie, Judith A A E Cuypers, Alexander Hirsch, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink, Annemien E van den Bosch","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyad033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aims Advanced transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using volumetric and deformational indices provides detailed quantification of right ventricular (RV) function in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Two-dimensional multi-plane echocardiography (2D-MPE) has demonstrated regional wall differences in RV longitudinal strain (LS). This study aims to evaluate the association of these parameters with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Methods and results One hundred stable ACHD patients with primarily affected RVs were included (age 50±5 years; 53% male). Conventional and advanced echocardiographic RV functional parameters were compared to CMR-derived RV function. Advanced echocardiographic RV functional parameters were measurable in approximately one-half of the study co-hort, whilst multi-wall LS assessment feasibility was lower. CMR RV ejection fraction (CMR-RVEF) was moderately correlated with deformational, area and volumetric parameters (RV global LS [lateral wall and septum], n=55: r=-0.62, p<0.001; RV wall average LS, n=34: r=-0.49, p=0.002; RV lateral wall LS, n=56: r=-0.45, p<0.001; fractional area change [FAC], n=67: r=0.48, p<0.001; 3D-RVEF, n=48: r=0.40, p=0.005). Conventional measurements such as TAPSE and RV S’ correlated poorly. RV global LS best identified CMR-RVEF <45% (AUC: 0.84, p<0.001: cut-off value -19%: sensitivity 100%, specificity 57%). RVEF and LS values were significantly higher when measured by CMR compared to TTE (mean difference RVEF: 5[-9 to 18]%; lateral (free) wall LS: -7[7 to -21]%; RV global LS: -6 [5 to -16]%) whilst there was no association between respective LS values. Conclusion In ACHD patients, advanced echocardiographic RV functional parameters are moderately correlated with CMR-RVEF, although significant differences exist between indices measurable by both modalities.","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":"313 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyad033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Aims Advanced transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using volumetric and deformational indices provides detailed quantification of right ventricular (RV) function in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Two-dimensional multi-plane echocardiography (2D-MPE) has demonstrated regional wall differences in RV longitudinal strain (LS). This study aims to evaluate the association of these parameters with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Methods and results One hundred stable ACHD patients with primarily affected RVs were included (age 50±5 years; 53% male). Conventional and advanced echocardiographic RV functional parameters were compared to CMR-derived RV function. Advanced echocardiographic RV functional parameters were measurable in approximately one-half of the study co-hort, whilst multi-wall LS assessment feasibility was lower. CMR RV ejection fraction (CMR-RVEF) was moderately correlated with deformational, area and volumetric parameters (RV global LS [lateral wall and septum], n=55: r=-0.62, p<0.001; RV wall average LS, n=34: r=-0.49, p=0.002; RV lateral wall LS, n=56: r=-0.45, p<0.001; fractional area change [FAC], n=67: r=0.48, p<0.001; 3D-RVEF, n=48: r=0.40, p=0.005). Conventional measurements such as TAPSE and RV S’ correlated poorly. RV global LS best identified CMR-RVEF <45% (AUC: 0.84, p<0.001: cut-off value -19%: sensitivity 100%, specificity 57%). RVEF and LS values were significantly higher when measured by CMR compared to TTE (mean difference RVEF: 5[-9 to 18]%; lateral (free) wall LS: -7[7 to -21]%; RV global LS: -6 [5 to -16]%) whilst there was no association between respective LS values. Conclusion In ACHD patients, advanced echocardiographic RV functional parameters are moderately correlated with CMR-RVEF, although significant differences exist between indices measurable by both modalities.