Design, Validation, and Reliability of a Basketball Skill and Performance Test Instrument in Adolescent Players

Q2 Social Sciences Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.17309/tmfv.2023.5.03
Muhammad Irvan Eva Salafi, Wawan Sundawan Suherman, Bernadeta Suhartini, Muhammad Sigit Antoni, Kukuh Wahyudin Pratama, Risti Nurfadhila, Wisnu Nugroho, Yulvia Miftachurohmah
{"title":"Design, Validation, and Reliability of a Basketball Skill and Performance Test Instrument in Adolescent Players","authors":"Muhammad Irvan Eva Salafi, Wawan Sundawan Suherman, Bernadeta Suhartini, Muhammad Sigit Antoni, Kukuh Wahyudin Pratama, Risti Nurfadhila, Wisnu Nugroho, Yulvia Miftachurohmah","doi":"10.17309/tmfv.2023.5.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study purpose. The assessment tools or skills tests, such as the AAHPERD basketball skill test and the Johnson basketball test, are all partial or separate. All these tests are old products, while the game of basketball is constantly evolving. The purpose of this study was to design and validate basketball skills and performance tests for players aged 14–16 years to shorten the test time, shorten the waiting time for results, and be comprehensive so that they can reflect real abilities and can be used as a reference when carrying out selection and evaluation. Materials and methods. A total of 7 experts assessed the 11 elements (86 items) of the basketball skill and performance test (BSPT). Three academic experts and four basketball coach experts took part in the study. Data was collected using the Delphi technique and test-retest, and data was analyzed using Aiken’s formula, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Cronbach’s alpha. Results. With a value of 0.91, the expert assessment tool shows that the content validity of the aspect is good. Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure the reliability of every aspect of the basketball skill and performance test instrument, and the results were 0.918. The result of the ICC score agreement between raters is 0.912, while for one rater, the consistency is 0.596. Conclusions. The implications of this study could prove that the BSPT can be used to assess the skill level of adolescent basketball players, benefiting not only basketball coaches but also physical education teachers.","PeriodicalId":36640,"journal":{"name":"Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna","volume":"36 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2023.5.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study purpose. The assessment tools or skills tests, such as the AAHPERD basketball skill test and the Johnson basketball test, are all partial or separate. All these tests are old products, while the game of basketball is constantly evolving. The purpose of this study was to design and validate basketball skills and performance tests for players aged 14–16 years to shorten the test time, shorten the waiting time for results, and be comprehensive so that they can reflect real abilities and can be used as a reference when carrying out selection and evaluation. Materials and methods. A total of 7 experts assessed the 11 elements (86 items) of the basketball skill and performance test (BSPT). Three academic experts and four basketball coach experts took part in the study. Data was collected using the Delphi technique and test-retest, and data was analyzed using Aiken’s formula, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Cronbach’s alpha. Results. With a value of 0.91, the expert assessment tool shows that the content validity of the aspect is good. Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure the reliability of every aspect of the basketball skill and performance test instrument, and the results were 0.918. The result of the ICC score agreement between raters is 0.912, while for one rater, the consistency is 0.596. Conclusions. The implications of this study could prove that the BSPT can be used to assess the skill level of adolescent basketball players, benefiting not only basketball coaches but also physical education teachers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年篮球技术与表现测试仪器的设计、验证与信度
研究的目的。评估工具或技能测试,如AAHPERD篮球技能测试和约翰逊篮球测试,都是部分或单独的。所有这些测试都是老产品,而篮球运动是不断发展的。本研究的目的是设计和验证14-16岁球员的篮球技术和成绩测试,以缩短测试时间,缩短等待结果的时间,并且全面,能够反映真实的能力,可以作为进行选拔和评估时的参考。材料和方法。共有7位专家对篮球技术与表现测试(BSPT)的11个要素(86个项目)进行了评估。三位学术专家和四位篮球教练专家参与了这项研究。采用德尔菲法和重测法收集数据,采用Aiken公式、类内相关系数(ICC)和Cronbach’s alpha对数据进行分析。结果。专家评估工具的效度值为0.91,表明该方面的内容效度较好。采用Cronbach’s alpha对篮球技术与表现测试仪器各方面的信度进行测量,结果为0.918。评价者之间的ICC评分一致性为0.912,同一评价者的一致性为0.596。结论。本研究的意义可以证明BSPT可以用来评估青少年篮球运动员的技术水平,不仅有利于篮球教练,也有利于体育教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna
Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of Fitball Exercise on Body Composition, Flexibility, Muscular Strength-Endurance and Aerobic Capacity in Obese Working-Age Women Effect of Periodized Interval Training in Combination with Explosive Strength and Speed in Game-Like Situation on Agility and High Intensity Aerobic Capacity of Youth Soccer Players The Effects of School-Based Handball Intervention on 12–14-Year-Old Children’s Physical Fitness and Performance Relation between Start Reaction Time and Performance Time among Women Finalist Sprinters in the Olympic Games 2000 to 2020 Control and Evaluation of the Strength Abilities of Primary School-Aged Karate Boys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1