Investigation of the Physiochemical and Microbiological Quality of Fruit Yoghurt Sold in Elazig Province

Pelin Demir, Yasin Baykalir, Gulsum Oksuztepe
{"title":"Investigation of the Physiochemical and Microbiological Quality of Fruit Yoghurt Sold in Elazig Province","authors":"Pelin Demir, Yasin Baykalir, Gulsum Oksuztepe","doi":"10.24018/ejfood.2023.5.5.709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to determine some quality parameters of 25 fruit yoghurt samples (strawberry, forest fruit, blueberry, apricot, fig, mango, peach) sold in Elazig province. For this purpose, physicochemical (pH, acidity, fat, dry matter, starch, peroxidase, heat treatment) and microbiological [total mesophilic aerobic (TMA) bacteria, psychrotrophic bacteria, Lactobacillus-Leuconostoc-Pediococcus (LLP), lactic streptococcus, proteolytic and lipolytic microorganism, coliform, Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus-Micrococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella spp. and yeast-mold] analyzes of fruit yoghurt samples were performed. It was determined that 14 samples (8%) did not comply with the Turkish Food Codex Fermented Dairy Products Communiqué and TSE yoghurt standard regarding acidity value (% l.a.). The presence of starch in 91 (52%), peroxidase in 91 (52%) and heat treatment tests in 147 (84%) of the samples were positive. In the 161 (92%) samples coliform, Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus-Micrococcus; and in the 154 (88%) of yeast and mold microorganisms were observed to be less than <1.0 log10 cfu/g of. Total psychrophilic bacteria, E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella spp. have not emerged in any of these samples (<1.0 log10 cfu/g). There is only a statistical significance observed in Proteolytic bacteria between fruit yoghurt groups (P < 0.05). The lowest number (5.36 ± 0.10 log10 cfu/g) of proteolytic bacteria was observed in forest fruit; the highest (7.02 ± 0.52 log10 cfu/g) was determined in yoghurt with figs. As a result, it was concluded that the microbiological quality of the examined fruit yoghurt samples was not adequate for the hygienic conditions. It is thought that hygienic conditions were not considered during the production process and it could pose a risk to public health.","PeriodicalId":11865,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejfood.2023.5.5.709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine some quality parameters of 25 fruit yoghurt samples (strawberry, forest fruit, blueberry, apricot, fig, mango, peach) sold in Elazig province. For this purpose, physicochemical (pH, acidity, fat, dry matter, starch, peroxidase, heat treatment) and microbiological [total mesophilic aerobic (TMA) bacteria, psychrotrophic bacteria, Lactobacillus-Leuconostoc-Pediococcus (LLP), lactic streptococcus, proteolytic and lipolytic microorganism, coliform, Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus-Micrococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella spp. and yeast-mold] analyzes of fruit yoghurt samples were performed. It was determined that 14 samples (8%) did not comply with the Turkish Food Codex Fermented Dairy Products Communiqué and TSE yoghurt standard regarding acidity value (% l.a.). The presence of starch in 91 (52%), peroxidase in 91 (52%) and heat treatment tests in 147 (84%) of the samples were positive. In the 161 (92%) samples coliform, Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus-Micrococcus; and in the 154 (88%) of yeast and mold microorganisms were observed to be less than <1.0 log10 cfu/g of. Total psychrophilic bacteria, E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella spp. have not emerged in any of these samples (<1.0 log10 cfu/g). There is only a statistical significance observed in Proteolytic bacteria between fruit yoghurt groups (P < 0.05). The lowest number (5.36 ± 0.10 log10 cfu/g) of proteolytic bacteria was observed in forest fruit; the highest (7.02 ± 0.52 log10 cfu/g) was determined in yoghurt with figs. As a result, it was concluded that the microbiological quality of the examined fruit yoghurt samples was not adequate for the hygienic conditions. It is thought that hygienic conditions were not considered during the production process and it could pose a risk to public health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Elazig市售水果酸奶理化及微生物品质调查
本研究对25种水果酸奶样品(草莓、林果、蓝莓、杏、无花果、芒果、桃子)进行了质量参数测定。为此,对水果酸奶样品进行了理化(pH值、酸度、脂肪、干物质、淀粉、过氧化物酶、热处理)和微生物(总中温需氧细菌(TMA)、嗜冷细菌、乳酸菌-白葡萄球菌- pediococcus (LLP)、乳酸链球菌、蛋白水解和脂溶微生物、大肠菌群、肠杆菌科、大肠杆菌、葡萄球菌-微球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、沙门氏菌和酵母菌)分析。经确定,14个样品(8%)不符合土耳其食品法典发酵乳制品公报和TSE酸奶关于酸度值(% l.a)的标准。91个(52%)样品中存在淀粉,91个(52%)样品中存在过氧化物酶,147个(84%)样品中存在热处理试验呈阳性。161份(92%)样品中大肠菌群、肠杆菌科和葡萄球菌-微球菌;其中,154株(88%)酵母菌和霉菌的微生物含量均小于1.0 log10 cfu/g。总嗜冷细菌、大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和沙门氏菌均未在这些样品中出现(1.0 log10 cfu/g)。在水果酸奶组之间,蛋白水解菌数量仅存在统计学意义(P <0.05)。森林果实中蛋白水解菌数量最少(5.36±0.10 log10 cfu/g);在含无花果的酸奶中含量最高(7.02±0.52 log10 cfu/g)。结果表明,检测的水果酸奶样品的微生物质量不符合卫生条件。据认为,在生产过程中没有考虑到卫生条件,这可能对公众健康构成威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Some Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam) Varieties in Mozambique Optimization of Hardness as a Textural Property of a Fruit Enriched Honey Sweetened Snack Bar for Children Aged 5 to 13 Years The Use of Blondo (by Product from Lauric Acid Production) for Cheese Fruiters: The Study Ratio of Milk with Blondo and Citric Acid Concentration as a Coagulant Potato Breeding for Late Blight Resistance in Central and East Africa An Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of Common Zingiber officinale Cultivars Grown in Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1