Numerical investigation of the effects of dry gas model and wet steam model in solar-driven refrigeration ejector system

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Chemical Product and Process Modeling Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1515/cppm-2023-0042
Honglun Cong, Jiao Zhang
{"title":"Numerical investigation of the effects of dry gas model and wet steam model in solar-driven refrigeration ejector system","authors":"Honglun Cong, Jiao Zhang","doi":"10.1515/cppm-2023-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Nowadays, the use of equipment with little pollution is essential due to the increase in the planet’s temperature. Ejectors are considered one of the equipment with no pollution, and their failure rate is low due to the lack of moving parts. Also, scholars have recently focused on improving the efficiency of industrial equipment. The use of accurate modeling is required to improve steam ejector performance. In a steam ejector, non-equilibrium condensation creates a two-phase flow situation. The wet steam model, used in this study, characterizes this two-phase flow. The study’s objective was to compare this wet steam model with the dry gas model. In the wet steam model, the liquid mass fraction is 0.25, and its calculated entrainment ratio is lower than the dry gas model, closely matching experimental observations. The dry gas model reaches a maximum Mach number of about 5, while the wet steam model approximates 4. A significant temperature difference exists between the two models, with the dry gas model indicating lower temperatures compared to the wet steam model. Diagonal shocks and expansion waves are evident in the mixing chamber, fixed cross-section, and diffuser. These phenomena occur with greater intensity and a slight delay in the wet steam model compared to the dry gas model.","PeriodicalId":9935,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Product and Process Modeling","volume":"184 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Product and Process Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2023-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Nowadays, the use of equipment with little pollution is essential due to the increase in the planet’s temperature. Ejectors are considered one of the equipment with no pollution, and their failure rate is low due to the lack of moving parts. Also, scholars have recently focused on improving the efficiency of industrial equipment. The use of accurate modeling is required to improve steam ejector performance. In a steam ejector, non-equilibrium condensation creates a two-phase flow situation. The wet steam model, used in this study, characterizes this two-phase flow. The study’s objective was to compare this wet steam model with the dry gas model. In the wet steam model, the liquid mass fraction is 0.25, and its calculated entrainment ratio is lower than the dry gas model, closely matching experimental observations. The dry gas model reaches a maximum Mach number of about 5, while the wet steam model approximates 4. A significant temperature difference exists between the two models, with the dry gas model indicating lower temperatures compared to the wet steam model. Diagonal shocks and expansion waves are evident in the mixing chamber, fixed cross-section, and diffuser. These phenomena occur with greater intensity and a slight delay in the wet steam model compared to the dry gas model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干气模型和湿蒸汽模型对太阳能驱动制冷喷射器系统影响的数值研究
摘要:随着地球温度的不断升高,使用低污染的设备是必不可少的。喷射器被认为是无污染的设备之一,由于没有运动部件,故障率很低。此外,学者们最近也关注于提高工业设备的效率。为了提高蒸汽喷射器的性能,需要采用精确的建模方法。在蒸汽喷射器中,非平衡冷凝产生两相流的情况。本研究中使用的湿蒸汽模型表征了这种两相流。这项研究的目的是比较湿蒸汽模型和干气体模型。在湿蒸汽模型中,液体质量分数为0.25,其计算的夹带比低于干气体模型,与实验观察结果吻合较好。干气模型的最大马赫数约为5,湿蒸汽模型的最大马赫数约为4。两种模型之间存在显著的温差,干气体模型的温度低于湿蒸汽模型。在混合室、固定截面和扩散器中存在明显的对角激波和膨胀波。与干气模型相比,这些现象在湿蒸汽模型中以更大的强度和轻微的延迟发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Product and Process Modeling
Chemical Product and Process Modeling ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Chemical Product and Process Modeling (CPPM) is a quarterly journal that publishes theoretical and applied research on product and process design modeling, simulation and optimization. Thanks to its international editorial board, the journal assembles the best papers from around the world on to cover the gap between product and process. The journal brings together chemical and process engineering researchers, practitioners, and software developers in a new forum for the international modeling and simulation community. Topics: equation oriented and modular simulation optimization technology for process and materials design, new modeling techniques shortcut modeling and design approaches performance of commercial and in-house simulation and optimization tools challenges faced in industrial product and process simulation and optimization computational fluid dynamics environmental process, food and pharmaceutical modeling topics drawn from the substantial areas of overlap between modeling and mathematics applied to chemical products and processes.
期刊最新文献
Heat transfer efficiency in gas-solid fluidized beds with flat and corrugated walls. Enhancing heat transfer in tube heat exchanger containing water/Cu nanofluid by using turbulator Enhancing heat exchanger efficiency with novel perforated cone-shaped turbulators and nanofluids: a computational study Mathematical modeling and evaluation of permeation and membrane separation performance for Fischer–Tropsch products in a hydrophilic membrane reactor Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental analysis of natural gas sweetening process using lean vapor compression: a comparison study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1