Relational responsibility, social discipline and behaviour in school: re-orienting discipline and authority through a distributed network of relational accountability

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pastoral Care in Education Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1080/02643944.2023.2263453
Rebecca Hibbin
{"title":"Relational responsibility, social discipline and behaviour in school: re-orienting discipline and authority through a distributed network of relational accountability","authors":"Rebecca Hibbin","doi":"10.1080/02643944.2023.2263453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an exploration of a non-hierarchical model of discipline observed in one Secondary School in the North-East of England, that employed the whole-school use of Restorative Practice enhanced by vertically structured Coaching Groups. This model supported a school community characterised by working restoratively with others to achieve an environment of high challenge-high support (Wachtel, 2013). Drawing on an original evaluation of Embedding Restorative Practice in Schools (Warin & Hibbin, 2020), the ‘Distributed Network of Relational Accountability’ (Hibbin & Warin, 2021) that this school created was based on relationship over authority and collective accounts of responsibility over individualised notions of blame. This model is described and unpacked, to understand how such a relationship-centred approach to behaviour that disrupts traditional ways of engaging with discipline in school, can be implemented and sustained over time. Key themes in relation to the modelling and practice of pro-social skills within the context of Coaching, and the democratization of the disciplinary system through discernment and knowing the child, are explored. It is suggested that such practice that is based on notions of Relational Responsibility (McNamee & Gergen, 1999) alongside a whole school ethos of care (Warin, 2017) fosters commitment, pro-social ability and ultimately leads to more democratic versions of Restorative Practice. In addition, it supplies both students and teachers with important opportunities for community building and disclosure, through exposure to diversity within the secure family base of the Coaching Group.","PeriodicalId":45422,"journal":{"name":"Pastoral Care in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pastoral Care in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2023.2263453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides an exploration of a non-hierarchical model of discipline observed in one Secondary School in the North-East of England, that employed the whole-school use of Restorative Practice enhanced by vertically structured Coaching Groups. This model supported a school community characterised by working restoratively with others to achieve an environment of high challenge-high support (Wachtel, 2013). Drawing on an original evaluation of Embedding Restorative Practice in Schools (Warin & Hibbin, 2020), the ‘Distributed Network of Relational Accountability’ (Hibbin & Warin, 2021) that this school created was based on relationship over authority and collective accounts of responsibility over individualised notions of blame. This model is described and unpacked, to understand how such a relationship-centred approach to behaviour that disrupts traditional ways of engaging with discipline in school, can be implemented and sustained over time. Key themes in relation to the modelling and practice of pro-social skills within the context of Coaching, and the democratization of the disciplinary system through discernment and knowing the child, are explored. It is suggested that such practice that is based on notions of Relational Responsibility (McNamee & Gergen, 1999) alongside a whole school ethos of care (Warin, 2017) fosters commitment, pro-social ability and ultimately leads to more democratic versions of Restorative Practice. In addition, it supplies both students and teachers with important opportunities for community building and disclosure, through exposure to diversity within the secure family base of the Coaching Group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关系责任、社会纪律和学校行为:通过关系责任的分布式网络重新定位纪律和权威
本文对英格兰东北部一所中学观察到的一种非分层的纪律模式进行了探索,该模式采用了由垂直结构的教练小组加强的全校恢复性实践。该模型支持学校社区,其特点是与他人进行恢复性合作,以实现高挑战-高支持的环境(Wachtel, 2013)。借鉴《在学校中嵌入恢复性实践》(Warin & Hibbin, 2020)的原始评估,这所学校创建的“关系问责的分布式网络”(Hibbin & Warin, 2021)是基于权威关系和个人责任概念的集体责任账户。本文对该模型进行了描述和分析,以了解这种以关系为中心的行为方法如何在一段时间内实施和维持,这种方法破坏了传统的学校纪律管理方式。在指导的背景下,与亲社会技能的建模和实践相关的关键主题,以及通过辨别和了解孩子的纪律系统的民主化,都被探讨了。有人建议,这种基于关系责任(McNamee & Gergen, 1999)概念的实践,以及整个学校的关怀精神(Warin, 2017),可以促进承诺、亲社会能力,并最终导致更民主的恢复性实践。此外,它为学生和教师提供了重要的机会,通过在教练小组的安全家庭基础内接触多样性,建立社区和披露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pastoral Care in Education
Pastoral Care in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a novel primary to secondary school transition personal and social education programme Exploring the relationship between the Emotional Literacy Support Assistant (ELSA) intervention and whole-school approaches to wellbeing – a case study High schoolers and dating issues: examining the effectiveness of an app-based mindfulness intervention “If we don’t adapt, we lose some parents”. Collaborations with migrant families in the context of student wellbeing Young people as co-researchers in schools: a collaborative research methodology which benefits young people and school culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1