Developing English Instructional Materials for Young Learners Oriented to Left and Right Brain Accommodation

Nursah Nola Berutu, Margana Margana
{"title":"Developing English Instructional Materials for Young Learners Oriented to Left and Right Brain Accommodation","authors":"Nursah Nola Berutu, Margana Margana","doi":"10.33394/jollt.v11i4.8900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development and formulation of English language learning materials, meticulously tailored to encompass the cognitive processes of both the left and right brain hemispheres, emerge as a matter of profound import in the realm of promoting efficacious language acquisition among Junior High School students. In light of this imperative, the present research endeavors to construct and design English instructional materials with a distinct focus on seventh-grade learners within the Junior High School milieu, with an overarching objective of optimizing left- and right-brain accommodation. The research methodology employed is Research and Development (R&D). The procedural trajectory encompassed writing a syllabus, designing the materials, doing material evaluation, and revising the material draft. In the context of data collection, a twofold approach was undertaken, featuring targeted questionnaires designed to elicit data pertaining to both the students' instructional requisites and their perceived learning needs. This validation is derived from a tripartite evaluation, encompassing data analysis, expert assessment, and student feedback. Expert judgment, indicative of the materials' categorization as falling within the \"good\" bracket, substantiates the meticulous development process, with an average score of 3.8. Likewise, the evaluation, reflected in an average score of 3.13, corroborates the materials' efficacy in cultivating a conducive learning environment. In summation, this study epitomizes a deliberate and comprehensive endeavor to forge English instructional materials that transcend conventional paradigms by cognizantly accommodating the cognitive dimensions of learners' brains. The harmonious fusion of pedagogical design and cognitive insight, as evinced in the development and evaluation process, advocates for a dynamic shift in instructional material construction to better align with the multifaceted cognitive attributes of students in Junior High Schools.","PeriodicalId":33956,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Languages and Language Teaching","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Languages and Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i4.8900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development and formulation of English language learning materials, meticulously tailored to encompass the cognitive processes of both the left and right brain hemispheres, emerge as a matter of profound import in the realm of promoting efficacious language acquisition among Junior High School students. In light of this imperative, the present research endeavors to construct and design English instructional materials with a distinct focus on seventh-grade learners within the Junior High School milieu, with an overarching objective of optimizing left- and right-brain accommodation. The research methodology employed is Research and Development (R&D). The procedural trajectory encompassed writing a syllabus, designing the materials, doing material evaluation, and revising the material draft. In the context of data collection, a twofold approach was undertaken, featuring targeted questionnaires designed to elicit data pertaining to both the students' instructional requisites and their perceived learning needs. This validation is derived from a tripartite evaluation, encompassing data analysis, expert assessment, and student feedback. Expert judgment, indicative of the materials' categorization as falling within the "good" bracket, substantiates the meticulous development process, with an average score of 3.8. Likewise, the evaluation, reflected in an average score of 3.13, corroborates the materials' efficacy in cultivating a conducive learning environment. In summation, this study epitomizes a deliberate and comprehensive endeavor to forge English instructional materials that transcend conventional paradigms by cognizantly accommodating the cognitive dimensions of learners' brains. The harmonious fusion of pedagogical design and cognitive insight, as evinced in the development and evaluation process, advocates for a dynamic shift in instructional material construction to better align with the multifaceted cognitive attributes of students in Junior High Schools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发以左右脑适应为导向的青少年英语教材
英语语言学习材料的开发和制定,精心定制以涵盖左右脑半球的认知过程,在促进初中学生有效的语言习得领域中具有深远的重要性。鉴于这一迫切需要,本研究努力构建和设计以初中环境中七年级学习者为重点的英语教学材料,以优化左脑和右脑适应为总体目标。所采用的研究方法是研究与发展(R&D)。程序轨迹包括编写教学大纲、设计材料、进行材料评估和修改材料草稿。在数据收集方面,采用了双重方法,其特点是设计有针对性的问卷,以引出与学生的教学要求和他们感知到的学习需求有关的数据。这种验证来自三方评估,包括数据分析、专家评估和学生反馈。专家的判断表明,材料的分类属于“好”的范围,证实了精心的开发过程,平均得分为3.8分。同样,平均得分3.13,证实了材料在培养有利的学习环境方面的功效。综上所述,本研究旨在通过认知适应学习者大脑的认知维度来打造超越传统范式的英语教学材料。教学设计与认知洞察的和谐融合,体现在开发和评价过程中,倡导教材建设的动态转变,以更好地适应初中学生多方面的认知属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Video Strategy as Scaffolding to Foster Students’ Grammar Proficiency and Writing Skills in EFL Learning Digital Peer Feedback and Students’ Critical Thinking: What Correlation and to What Extent? Translate Self-Review (TSR) Method Based on Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) for Arabic Writing Learning in Higher Education The Representation of the Indonesian Government in Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Rempang Island Conflict Computer-Based Technology on Writing Performance: A Systematic Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1