{"title":"Revisiting oxygen‐18 and clumped isotopes in planktic and benthic foraminifera","authors":"M. Daëron, W. R. Gray","doi":"10.1029/2023pa004660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Foraminiferal isotopes are widely used to study past oceans, with different species recording conditions at different depths. Their δ 18 O values record both seawater oxygen‐18 and temperature according to species‐specific fractionation factors, while their Δ 47 signatures likely depend only on temperature. We describe an open‐source framework to collect/combine data relevant to foraminiferal isotopes, by constraining species‐specific oxygen‐18 fractionation factors ( 18 α ) based on culture experiments, stratified plankton tows or core‐top sediments; compiling stratified plankton tow constraints on living depths for planktic species; extracting seawater temperature, δ 18 O, and chemistry from existing databases for any latitude, longitude, and depth‐range; inferring calcification temperatures based on the above data. We find that although 18 α differs between species, its temperature sensitivity remains indistinguishable from inorganic calcite. Based on > 2,600 observations we show that, although most planktic δ 18 O values are consistent with seawater temperature and δ 18 O over their expected living depths, a sizable minority (12%–24%) have heavier‐than‐predicted δ 18 O, best explained by calcification in deeper waters. We use this framework to revisit three recent Δ 47 calibration studies of planktic/benthic foraminifera, confirming that planktic Δ 47 varies systematically with oxygen‐18‐derived temperature estimates, even for samples whose δ 18 O disagrees with assumed climatological conditions, and demonstrating excellent agreement between planktic foraminifera and modern, largely inorganic Δ 47 calibrations. Benthic foraminifera remain ambiguous: modern benthic Δ 47 values appear offset from planktic ones, yet applying equilibrium Δ 47 calibration to the Cenozoic benthic foraminifer record of Meckler et al. (2022, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk0604 ) largely reconciles it with δ 18 O‐derived temperatures, with discrete Δ 47 /δ 18 O discrepancies persisting in the Late Paleocene/Eocene/Plio‐Pleistocene.","PeriodicalId":54239,"journal":{"name":"Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023pa004660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Abstract Foraminiferal isotopes are widely used to study past oceans, with different species recording conditions at different depths. Their δ 18 O values record both seawater oxygen‐18 and temperature according to species‐specific fractionation factors, while their Δ 47 signatures likely depend only on temperature. We describe an open‐source framework to collect/combine data relevant to foraminiferal isotopes, by constraining species‐specific oxygen‐18 fractionation factors ( 18 α ) based on culture experiments, stratified plankton tows or core‐top sediments; compiling stratified plankton tow constraints on living depths for planktic species; extracting seawater temperature, δ 18 O, and chemistry from existing databases for any latitude, longitude, and depth‐range; inferring calcification temperatures based on the above data. We find that although 18 α differs between species, its temperature sensitivity remains indistinguishable from inorganic calcite. Based on > 2,600 observations we show that, although most planktic δ 18 O values are consistent with seawater temperature and δ 18 O over their expected living depths, a sizable minority (12%–24%) have heavier‐than‐predicted δ 18 O, best explained by calcification in deeper waters. We use this framework to revisit three recent Δ 47 calibration studies of planktic/benthic foraminifera, confirming that planktic Δ 47 varies systematically with oxygen‐18‐derived temperature estimates, even for samples whose δ 18 O disagrees with assumed climatological conditions, and demonstrating excellent agreement between planktic foraminifera and modern, largely inorganic Δ 47 calibrations. Benthic foraminifera remain ambiguous: modern benthic Δ 47 values appear offset from planktic ones, yet applying equilibrium Δ 47 calibration to the Cenozoic benthic foraminifer record of Meckler et al. (2022, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk0604 ) largely reconciles it with δ 18 O‐derived temperatures, with discrete Δ 47 /δ 18 O discrepancies persisting in the Late Paleocene/Eocene/Plio‐Pleistocene.
期刊介绍:
Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology (PALO) publishes papers dealing with records of past environments, biota and climate. Understanding of the Earth system as it was in the past requires the employment of a wide range of approaches including marine and lacustrine sedimentology and speleothems; ice sheet formation and flow; stable isotope, trace element, and organic geochemistry; paleontology and molecular paleontology; evolutionary processes; mineralization in organisms; understanding tree-ring formation; seismic stratigraphy; physical, chemical, and biological oceanography; geochemical, climate and earth system modeling, and many others. The scope of this journal is regional to global, rather than local, and includes studies of any geologic age (Precambrian to Quaternary, including modern analogs). Within this framework, papers on the following topics are to be included: chronology, stratigraphy (where relevant to correlation of paleoceanographic events), paleoreconstructions, paleoceanographic modeling, paleocirculation (deep, intermediate, and shallow), paleoclimatology (e.g., paleowinds and cryosphere history), global sediment and geochemical cycles, anoxia, sea level changes and effects, relations between biotic evolution and paleoceanography, biotic crises, paleobiology (e.g., ecology of “microfossils” used in paleoceanography), techniques and approaches in paleoceanographic inferences, and modern paleoceanographic analogs, and quantitative and integrative analysis of coupled ocean-atmosphere-biosphere processes. Paleoceanographic and Paleoclimate studies enable us to use the past in order to gain information on possible future climatic and biotic developments: the past is the key to the future, just as much and maybe more than the present is the key to the past.