The Socialist Project on Social Media Platforms: Anticapitalist Organization in Platform Capitalism

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES South Atlantic Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1215/00382876-10779451
Tanner Mirrlees
{"title":"The Socialist Project on Social Media Platforms: Anticapitalist Organization in Platform Capitalism","authors":"Tanner Mirrlees","doi":"10.1215/00382876-10779451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a self-reflexive case study of the Socialist Project's (SP) tactical uses of Meta's Facebook and Google's YouTube platforms. Formed in early 2003 by Leo Panitch (1945–2020), Greg Albo, Sam Gindin, Herman Rosenfeld, and others, the SP is a small Toronto-based democratic socialist organization that for nearly two decades has contributed to wider efforts to build and sustain an anticapitalist “infrastructure of dissent” and “radical imagination.” While Facebook's and YouTube's ownership structures, business models, and datafication and commodification mechanisms limit the SP's tactical uses of these platforms, the SP's agency to use these to try to make history in digital conditions not of its own choosing is significant. This article argues that the SP's tactical use of social media platforms exists between structure and agency, at the interface of top-down platform capitalist business models, mechanisms, and logics and bottom-up anticapitalist organization building, public pedagogy, and alternative media making.","PeriodicalId":21946,"journal":{"name":"South Atlantic Quarterly","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Atlantic Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-10779451","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a self-reflexive case study of the Socialist Project's (SP) tactical uses of Meta's Facebook and Google's YouTube platforms. Formed in early 2003 by Leo Panitch (1945–2020), Greg Albo, Sam Gindin, Herman Rosenfeld, and others, the SP is a small Toronto-based democratic socialist organization that for nearly two decades has contributed to wider efforts to build and sustain an anticapitalist “infrastructure of dissent” and “radical imagination.” While Facebook's and YouTube's ownership structures, business models, and datafication and commodification mechanisms limit the SP's tactical uses of these platforms, the SP's agency to use these to try to make history in digital conditions not of its own choosing is significant. This article argues that the SP's tactical use of social media platforms exists between structure and agency, at the interface of top-down platform capitalist business models, mechanisms, and logics and bottom-up anticapitalist organization building, public pedagogy, and alternative media making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体平台上的社会主义项目:平台资本主义中的反资本主义组织
本文是社会主义计划(SP)对Meta的Facebook和Google的YouTube平台的战术使用的一个自我反思的案例研究。社会主义党成立于2003年初,由Leo Panitch(1945-2020)、Greg Albo、Sam Gindin、Herman Rosenfeld等人组成,是一个位于多伦多的小型民主社会主义组织,近二十年来,它为建立和维持反资本主义的“异议基础设施”和“激进想象”做出了更广泛的贡献。虽然Facebook和YouTube的所有权结构、商业模式、数据化和商品化机制限制了服务提供商对这些平台的策略性使用,但服务提供商的代理机构利用这些平台,试图在非自己选择的数字条件下创造历史,这一点意义重大。本文认为,社会主义党对社交媒体平台的战术使用存在于结构和代理之间,存在于自上而下的平台资本主义商业模式、机制和逻辑与自下而上的反资本主义组织建设、公共教育学和替代媒体制作的界面上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Individual subscribers and institutions with electronic access can view issues of the South Atlantic Quarterly online. If you have not signed up, review the first-time access instructions. Founded amid controversy in 1901, the South Atlantic Quarterly continues to cover the beat, center and fringe, with bold analyses of the current scene—national, cultural, intellectual—worldwide. Now published exclusively in special issues, this vanguard centenarian journal is tackling embattled states, evaluating postmodernity"s influential writers and intellectuals, and examining a wide range of cultural phenomena.
期刊最新文献
Multitude and Memory in the Chilean Social Uprising A Politics of Care from the Margins of Chile's Social Uprising Introduction: Widening the Space of Politics Mapuche Anti-colonial Politics and Chile's Social Uprising The Socialist Project on Social Media Platforms: Anticapitalist Organization in Platform Capitalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1