Plantar Flexor Weakness and Pain Sensitivity Cannot Be Assumed in Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy

Lauren K. Sara, Savannah B. Gutsch, Marie Hoeger Bement, Sandra K. Hunter
{"title":"Plantar Flexor Weakness and Pain Sensitivity Cannot Be Assumed in Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy","authors":"Lauren K. Sara, Savannah B. Gutsch, Marie Hoeger Bement, Sandra K. Hunter","doi":"10.1249/esm.0000000000000017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction/Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the following in persons with midportion Achilles tendinopathy (AT): 1) maximal strength and power; 2) neural drive during maximal contractions and contractile function during electrically evoked resting contractions; and 3) whether pain, neural drive, and contractile mechanisms contribute to differences in maximal strength. Methods Twenty-eight volunteers (14 AT, 14 controls) completed isometric, concentric, and eccentric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the plantar flexors in a Biodex™ dynamometer. Supramaximal electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve was performed to quantify neural drive and contractile properties of the plantar flexors. Pain sensitivity was quantified as the pressure-pain thresholds of the Achilles tendon, medial gastrocnemius, and upper trapezius. Results There were no differences in plantar flexion strength or power between AT and controls (isometric MVC: P = 0.95; dynamic MVC: P = 0.99; power: P = 0.98), nor were there differences in neural drive and contractile function ( P = 0.55 and P = 0.06, respectively). However, the mechanisms predicting maximal strength differed between groups: neural drive predicted maximal strength in controls ( P = 0.02) and contractile function predicted maximal strength in AT ( P = 0.001). Although pain did not mediate these relationships (i.e., between maximal strength and its contributing mechanisms), pressure-pain thresholds at the upper trapezius were higher in AT ( P = 0.02), despite being similar at the calf ( P = 0.24) and Achilles tendon ( P = 0.40). Conclusions There were no deficits in plantar flexion strength or power in persons with AT, whether evaluated isometrically, concentrically, or eccentrically. However, the mechanisms predicting maximal plantar flexor strength differed between groups, and systemic pain sensitivity was diminished in AT.","PeriodicalId":72994,"journal":{"name":"Exercise, sport, & movement","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exercise, sport, & movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/esm.0000000000000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction/Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the following in persons with midportion Achilles tendinopathy (AT): 1) maximal strength and power; 2) neural drive during maximal contractions and contractile function during electrically evoked resting contractions; and 3) whether pain, neural drive, and contractile mechanisms contribute to differences in maximal strength. Methods Twenty-eight volunteers (14 AT, 14 controls) completed isometric, concentric, and eccentric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the plantar flexors in a Biodex™ dynamometer. Supramaximal electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve was performed to quantify neural drive and contractile properties of the plantar flexors. Pain sensitivity was quantified as the pressure-pain thresholds of the Achilles tendon, medial gastrocnemius, and upper trapezius. Results There were no differences in plantar flexion strength or power between AT and controls (isometric MVC: P = 0.95; dynamic MVC: P = 0.99; power: P = 0.98), nor were there differences in neural drive and contractile function ( P = 0.55 and P = 0.06, respectively). However, the mechanisms predicting maximal strength differed between groups: neural drive predicted maximal strength in controls ( P = 0.02) and contractile function predicted maximal strength in AT ( P = 0.001). Although pain did not mediate these relationships (i.e., between maximal strength and its contributing mechanisms), pressure-pain thresholds at the upper trapezius were higher in AT ( P = 0.02), despite being similar at the calf ( P = 0.24) and Achilles tendon ( P = 0.40). Conclusions There were no deficits in plantar flexion strength or power in persons with AT, whether evaluated isometrically, concentrically, or eccentrically. However, the mechanisms predicting maximal plantar flexor strength differed between groups, and systemic pain sensitivity was diminished in AT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
足底屈肌无力和疼痛敏感性不能被认为是跟腱中段病变
摘要简介/目的本研究的目的是确定跟腱中段病变(AT)患者的以下指标:1)最大力量和力量;2)最大收缩时的神经驱动和电诱发静息收缩时的收缩功能;3)疼痛、神经驱动和收缩机制是否影响最大力量的差异。方法28名志愿者(实验组14名,对照组14名)在Biodex™测力仪中完成了足底屈肌的等距、同心和偏心最大自主收缩(MVCs)。对胫骨神经进行最大限度电刺激,以量化足底屈肌的神经驱动和收缩特性。疼痛敏感性被量化为跟腱、内侧腓肠肌和上斜方肌的压痛阈值。结果AT组和对照组的足底屈曲强度和力量无差异(等距MVC: P = 0.95;动态MVC: P = 0.99;功率:P = 0.98),神经驱动和收缩功能也无差异(P = 0.55和P = 0.06)。然而,预测最大力量的机制在各组之间存在差异:神经驱动预测对照组的最大力量(P = 0.02),收缩功能预测AT组的最大力量(P = 0.001)。尽管疼痛并没有介导这些关系(即最大力量与其促成机制之间的关系),但在at中,上斜方肌的压力疼痛阈值更高(P = 0.02),尽管在小腿(P = 0.24)和跟腱(P = 0.40)相似。结论:无论是等距测量、同心测量还是偏心测量,AT患者的足底屈曲强度或力量均无缺陷。然而,预测最大足底屈肌力量的机制在两组之间有所不同,全身疼痛敏感性在AT中降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adverse Event Assessment and Reporting in Exercise Oncology: A Review T2 Hamstring Muscle Activation during the Single-Leg Roman Chair: Impact of Prior Injury Plantar Flexor Weakness and Pain Sensitivity Cannot Be Assumed in Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy Measurement of Psoas Major Correlating with Functional Performance in Asymptomatic Adults—An MRI and Ultrasound Study A Novel Custom Cycle Ergometer Protocol to Determine V̇O2max: Validation with ACSM’s Cycle Ergometry Metabolic Equation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1