Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin by Bettina Stoetzer (review)

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES German Studies Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1353/gsr.2023.a910198
{"title":"Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin by Bettina Stoetzer (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.a910198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin by Bettina Stoetzer Thomas Sullivan Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin. By Bettina Stoetzer. Durham: Duke University Press, 2022. Pp. xvii + 328. Paper $28.95. ISBN 9781478018605. Ruins, voids, and overgrown spaces have long been a distinctive feature of Berlin's built environment. Scarred by massive destruction during World War II, divided during the Cold War, and then subject to major development and speculation following [End Page 517] reunification, Berlin has been shaped by cyclical patterns of rupture, destruction, and re-imagination. Repeated regenerations produced a city, over time, with fragmented gaps that often became overgrown, hosting spontaneous, ever-evolving botanical communities. Within these spaces of ruination and spontaneous growth, unplanned and unique environments emerged, combining expected plant and animal species with \"unexpected newcomers\": non-native species arriving via war, displacement, migration, and trade (37). The study of these sites by celebrated urban ecologist Herbert Sukopp and his collaborators made Berlin a center for the study of \"ruderal ecologies\": unexpected, unplanned, and unpredictable assemblages of plants and animals spontaneously emerging within disturbed urban spaces. A substantial number of scholarly publications, including recent books such as Jens Lachmund's Greening Berlin: The Co-production of Science, Politics, and Urban Nature (2013) and Matthew Gandy's Natura Urbana: Ecological Constellations in Urban Space (2022), have further examined and analyzed these spaces. Bettina Stoetzer's book, Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin (2022), similarly takes Berlin's ruderal ecologies as a starting point but utilizes them in a new way, arguing that they offer an alternate way of examining urban life and processes. Positing that ruination and rubble are \"central to the urban landscapes we inhabit\" and the constant product of \"social exclusions, capitalist urbanization, and profound environmental change,\" Stoetzer proposes and advocates the use of a \"ruderal analytic\" (25–26). Building on the ecological understanding of the term, Stoetzer conceptualizes \"ruderal\" organisms as arising in conditions of hybridity, disturbance, and inhospitableness. The ruderal, then, is \"neither wild nor domesticated\" and arises as the product of \"juxtapositions of contrasting environments\" (4). This conceptualization of ruderal-as-analytic echoes the ecological version in multiple ways. Just as ruderal plants arise in disparate, in-between, and unexpected spaces, a ruderal analytic encourages an ethnographic approach focused on \"catching glimpses of seemingly disparate worlds\" (5) and focuses attention on the gaps and cracks of modern urban life (25). Echoing the hybridity of ruderal plants, which often trouble categorization, this approach calls on researchers to question clear conceptual distinctions, all-encompassing terms, and totalizing perspectives regarding urban life and spaces. Alternatively, it advocates for articulating complexity, accepting partial answers, and assembling fragments of stories to imagine new possibilities for more than just urban existences. Just as ruderal plants arise spontaneously in diverse environments yet can have related origins, the hybridity of ruderal plants also encourages a multisite approach, advocating collecting many strands of stories and then \"seek[ing] connections between sites and track[ing] relations\" that might suggest new understandings or possibilities (26–27). Demonstrating this \"ruderal analytic,\" Stoetzer offers an engaging ethnographic analysis of multiple sites in Berlin and its hinterlands, illuminating the role of nature [End Page 518] in racialized politics and processes of migration and German nation-making. Using interviews and participant observation of a variety of actors in forests, parks, and urban gardens, Stoetzer examines how sites of urban nature are made and remade, contested and reimagined, managed and occupied, all in ways that reconfigure inequalities, racialize people and practices, and reinforce national boundaries (6). Following an introduction to Berlin, the fieldwork underpinning the book, and the concept of the \"ruderal,\" Stoetzer proceeds in four parts. First, she explores Berlin's history as a site of ruderal ecologies via the example of sticky goosefoot (Chenopodium botrys), a ruderal plant that has unexpectedly thrived in post-World War II Berlin. Using this species as an example, Stoetzer chronicles the role of nature in the making and remaking of Berlin and the German nation. The following three chapters each analyzes multi-sited fieldwork in different types of urban nature sites: intercultural urban...","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.a910198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin by Bettina Stoetzer Thomas Sullivan Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin. By Bettina Stoetzer. Durham: Duke University Press, 2022. Pp. xvii + 328. Paper $28.95. ISBN 9781478018605. Ruins, voids, and overgrown spaces have long been a distinctive feature of Berlin's built environment. Scarred by massive destruction during World War II, divided during the Cold War, and then subject to major development and speculation following [End Page 517] reunification, Berlin has been shaped by cyclical patterns of rupture, destruction, and re-imagination. Repeated regenerations produced a city, over time, with fragmented gaps that often became overgrown, hosting spontaneous, ever-evolving botanical communities. Within these spaces of ruination and spontaneous growth, unplanned and unique environments emerged, combining expected plant and animal species with "unexpected newcomers": non-native species arriving via war, displacement, migration, and trade (37). The study of these sites by celebrated urban ecologist Herbert Sukopp and his collaborators made Berlin a center for the study of "ruderal ecologies": unexpected, unplanned, and unpredictable assemblages of plants and animals spontaneously emerging within disturbed urban spaces. A substantial number of scholarly publications, including recent books such as Jens Lachmund's Greening Berlin: The Co-production of Science, Politics, and Urban Nature (2013) and Matthew Gandy's Natura Urbana: Ecological Constellations in Urban Space (2022), have further examined and analyzed these spaces. Bettina Stoetzer's book, Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin (2022), similarly takes Berlin's ruderal ecologies as a starting point but utilizes them in a new way, arguing that they offer an alternate way of examining urban life and processes. Positing that ruination and rubble are "central to the urban landscapes we inhabit" and the constant product of "social exclusions, capitalist urbanization, and profound environmental change," Stoetzer proposes and advocates the use of a "ruderal analytic" (25–26). Building on the ecological understanding of the term, Stoetzer conceptualizes "ruderal" organisms as arising in conditions of hybridity, disturbance, and inhospitableness. The ruderal, then, is "neither wild nor domesticated" and arises as the product of "juxtapositions of contrasting environments" (4). This conceptualization of ruderal-as-analytic echoes the ecological version in multiple ways. Just as ruderal plants arise in disparate, in-between, and unexpected spaces, a ruderal analytic encourages an ethnographic approach focused on "catching glimpses of seemingly disparate worlds" (5) and focuses attention on the gaps and cracks of modern urban life (25). Echoing the hybridity of ruderal plants, which often trouble categorization, this approach calls on researchers to question clear conceptual distinctions, all-encompassing terms, and totalizing perspectives regarding urban life and spaces. Alternatively, it advocates for articulating complexity, accepting partial answers, and assembling fragments of stories to imagine new possibilities for more than just urban existences. Just as ruderal plants arise spontaneously in diverse environments yet can have related origins, the hybridity of ruderal plants also encourages a multisite approach, advocating collecting many strands of stories and then "seek[ing] connections between sites and track[ing] relations" that might suggest new understandings or possibilities (26–27). Demonstrating this "ruderal analytic," Stoetzer offers an engaging ethnographic analysis of multiple sites in Berlin and its hinterlands, illuminating the role of nature [End Page 518] in racialized politics and processes of migration and German nation-making. Using interviews and participant observation of a variety of actors in forests, parks, and urban gardens, Stoetzer examines how sites of urban nature are made and remade, contested and reimagined, managed and occupied, all in ways that reconfigure inequalities, racialize people and practices, and reinforce national boundaries (6). Following an introduction to Berlin, the fieldwork underpinning the book, and the concept of the "ruderal," Stoetzer proceeds in four parts. First, she explores Berlin's history as a site of ruderal ecologies via the example of sticky goosefoot (Chenopodium botrys), a ruderal plant that has unexpectedly thrived in post-World War II Berlin. Using this species as an example, Stoetzer chronicles the role of nature in the making and remaking of Berlin and the German nation. The following three chapters each analyzes multi-sited fieldwork in different types of urban nature sites: intercultural urban...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《野性城市:柏林的移民、种族和城市自然生态》贝蒂娜·施托策著(书评)
作者:贝蒂娜·施托策(Bettina Stoetzer),托马斯·沙利文(Thomas Sullivan)。作者:Ruderal City:移民、种族和城市自然的生态学。贝蒂娜·斯托策著。杜伦:杜克大学出版社,2022。第17 + 328页。论文28.95美元。ISBN 9781478018605。废墟、空洞和杂草丛生的空间长期以来一直是柏林建筑环境的鲜明特征。第二次世界大战期间的大规模破坏留下了疤痕,冷战期间分裂,然后在统一后受到重大发展和猜测的影响,柏林已经被破裂,破坏和重新想象的周期性模式所塑造。随着时间的推移,重复的再生产生了一个城市,其中有碎片化的空隙,经常变得杂草丛生,承载着自发的、不断进化的植物群落。在这些毁灭和自发生长的空间中,出现了计划外和独特的环境,将预期的动植物物种与“意想不到的新来者”结合在一起:通过战争、流离失所、迁徙和贸易到达的非本地物种(37)。著名的城市生态学家Herbert Sukopp和他的合作者对这些地点的研究使柏林成为“原始生态学”的研究中心:意外的、计划外的、不可预测的植物和动物的集合自发地出现在受干扰的城市空间中。大量的学术出版物,包括最近出版的延斯·拉赫蒙德的《绿化柏林:科学、政治和城市自然的共同生产》(2013年)和马修·甘迪的《自然城市:城市空间中的生态星座》(2022年),都进一步研究和分析了这些空间。Bettina Stoetzer的书《野蛮的城市:柏林的移民、种族和城市自然生态》(2022)同样以柏林的野蛮生态为出发点,但以一种新的方式利用它们,认为它们提供了一种审视城市生活和过程的替代方法。假定废墟和瓦砾是“我们居住的城市景观的核心”,是“社会排斥、资本主义城市化和深刻的环境变化”的持续产物,斯托策建议并提倡使用“粗糙分析”(25-26)。基于对这个术语的生态学理解,斯托策将“野蛮”生物概念化为在混杂、干扰和不适宜居住的条件下产生的生物。因此,野蛮人“既不是野生的,也不是驯化的”,并且作为“对比环境并置”的产物而出现(4)。野蛮人作为分析者的这种概念化以多种方式与生态版本相呼应。就像野生植物出现在不同的、中间的和意想不到的空间一样,野生分析鼓励一种民族志方法,专注于“捕捉看似不同的世界的一瞥”(5),并将注意力集中在现代城市生活的差距和裂缝上(25)。与通常难以分类的野生植物的杂交性相呼应,这种方法要求研究人员质疑明确的概念区别、包万象的术语以及关于城市生活和空间的总体观点。或者,它提倡阐明复杂性,接受部分答案,并将故事片段组合起来,想象城市生活之外的新可能性。就像野生植物在不同的环境中自发产生,但可能有相关的起源一样,野生植物的杂交性也鼓励了一种多地点的方法,提倡收集许多故事,然后“寻找地点之间的联系,追踪关系”,这可能会提出新的理解或可能性(26-27)。为了证明这种“总体分析”,施托策对柏林及其腹地的多个地点进行了引人入胜的民族志分析,阐明了自然在种族化政治、移民过程和德国国家形成过程中的作用。通过对森林、公园和城市花园中各种参与者的访谈和参与观察,施托策研究了城市自然场所是如何被制造和改造的,是如何被争夺和重新想象的,是如何被管理和占领的,所有这些都是以重新配置不平等、使人们和实践种族化、加强国家边界的方式进行的(6)。在介绍了柏林、支撑本书的实地调查和“乡村”概念之后,施托策分为四个部分。首先,她通过粘鹅脚(Chenopodium botrys)的例子,探索了柏林作为一个乡土生态遗址的历史,这种乡土植物在第二次世界大战后的柏林出人意料地茁壮成长。以这个物种为例,施托策记录了自然在柏林和德意志民族的形成和重塑中所扮演的角色。以下三章分别分析了不同类型的城市自然遗址中的多地点实地考察:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
期刊最新文献
Cultural Narratives of Charles V and Spanish Imaginaries in West Germany during the Franco Dictatorship Energy and Power: Germany in the Age of Oil, Atoms, and Climate Change by Stephen G. Gross (review) Günter Grass und die Berliner Republik. Eine biografische Fallstudie über die kommunikative Macht von Intellektuellen by Friederike Stausberg (review) Writing at a Distance: Notes on Authorship and Artificial Intelligence Ethiken der Essenz. Eine Emotions- und Körpergeschichte der Rasse in inneren Kolonien (1890–1933) by Anna Danilina (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1