首页 > 最新文献

German Studies Review最新文献

英文 中文
African Students in East Germany, 1949–1975 by Sara Pugach (review) 1949-1975年在东德的非洲学生萨拉·普加奇著(书评)
4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/gsr.2023.a910196
Reviewed by: African Students in East Germany, 1949–1975 by Sara Pugach Katherine Pence African Students in East Germany, 1949–1975. By Sara Pugach. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2022. Pp. ix + 256. Paper $29.95. ISBN 9780472055562. In the Cold War battle for affinities of peoples around the globe, socialist states, such as the German Democratic Republic (GDR), decried ongoing racism and imperialism of the capitalist West and declared themselves as bastions of anti-racism and of solidarity with decolonizing nations in the Global South. One concrete way that East Germany and other Soviet-bloc states practiced this solidarity was by offering African students scholarships to study in university and vocational training programs, so they could return to build up their home countries through technical expertise. Sara Pugach's excellent new book shows that studying in East Germany was much more complicated for African exchange students than the official anti-racist party dogma purported. Using interviews and extensive research in German, British, Kenyan, and Ghanaian archives, Pugach finds that legacies of prewar racism continued into the GDR, creating deep ambivalence toward non-whites there. The book also helpfully analyzes humanitarianism and development aid by focusing not on state-level or European actors but on the perspectives of average students whose scholarships were [End Page 513] one aspect of aid and cultural diplomacy. As such, Pugach's work takes its place among the best new works that analyze the intersection of the Cold War and decolonization. The book is rich in its approach since it straddles both a transnational framework of flows across borders and a micro-history of everyday interactions between East Germans and African students. Pugach has importantly sought out sources giving voice to individual students, and she includes archival photos of the students throughout. Pugach examines African students' experiences from their selection as scholarship recipients through their complex travel routes to East Germany to their life while studying. Chapter One focuses on the first set of eleven students who came from Nigeria in 1951. Other chapters profile subsequent groups from socialist-aligned countries, such as Ghana or Mali, and non-aligned nations, such as Kenya. Pugach maintains the specificity of these diverse contexts, showing how ethnic divisions and changing politics in the home countries affected the students abroad. Chapter Two traces how students traveled through circuitous and difficult routes to East Germany, often through transit hubs such as Cairo. Chapter Three focuses on Ghana to exemplify how African countries selected students for study abroad. The GDR Ministry of Foreign Affairs often worked with local trade missions or government agencies, such as the Ghanaian Scholarships Secretariat, to identify prospective students. Socialist-leaning leaders, such as Ghana's Kwame Nkrumah, and parties, such as Kenya's ZI
书评:《东德的非洲学生,1949-1975》作者:Sara Pugach Katherine Pence。萨拉·普格奇著。安娜堡:密歇根大学出版社,2022。Pp. ix + 256。论文29.95美元。ISBN 9780472055562。在争夺全球各国人民亲缘关系的冷战中,社会主义国家,如德意志民主共和国(GDR),谴责资本主义西方的持续种族主义和帝国主义,并宣称自己是反种族主义的堡垒,并与全球南方的非殖民化国家团结一致。东德和其他苏联集团国家践行这种团结的一个具体方式是,向非洲学生提供奖学金,让他们在大学和职业培训项目中学习,这样他们就可以通过技术专长回国建设自己的国家。萨拉·普格奇(Sara Pugach)出色的新书表明,对于非洲交换生来说,在东德学习要比官方反种族主义政党教条所宣称的复杂得多。通过对德国、英国、肯尼亚和加纳档案的采访和广泛研究,普加奇发现战前种族主义的遗产一直延续到民主德国,在那里对非白人产生了深刻的矛盾心理。这本书也对人道主义和发展援助进行了有益的分析,它没有关注国家层面或欧洲的参与者,而是关注普通学生的观点,这些学生的奖学金是援助和文化外交的一个方面。因此,普格奇的作品在分析冷战和非殖民化的交叉点的最好的新作品中占有一席之地。这本书的方法丰富,因为它跨越了跨境流动的跨国框架和东德和非洲学生之间日常互动的微观历史。重要的是,普格奇找到了让学生个人发声的来源,她在书中收录了学生们的档案照片。普加奇考察了非洲学生的经历,从他们被选为奖学金获得者,到他们前往东德的复杂旅行路线,再到他们在学习期间的生活。第一章的重点是1951年从尼日利亚来的第一批11名学生。其他章节描述了随后来自社会主义联盟国家(如加纳或马里)和不结盟国家(如肯尼亚)的群体。Pugach保持了这些不同背景的特殊性,展示了祖国的种族分裂和政治变化如何影响到海外学生。第二章描述了学生们是如何通过迂回艰难的路线到达东德的,通常是通过开罗等交通枢纽。第三章以加纳为例,说明非洲国家是如何选择学生出国留学的。民主德国外交部经常与当地贸易代表团或加纳奖学金秘书处等政府机构合作,以确定未来的学生。社会主义倾向的领导人,如加纳的夸梅·恩克鲁玛(Kwame Nkrumah),以及肯尼亚的兹卡党(ZIKA)等政党,也为奖学金提供了便利。然而,交换协议是脆弱的,学生的轨迹与掌权的政权联系在一起。例如,从1966年恩克鲁玛下台到1973年民主德国获得全球认可,没有加纳人在民主德国学习。当州政府官员希望学生们遵从国家议程时,Pugach敏锐地展示了学生们是如何在背负着沉重的期望和限制的情况下,坚持个人和集体机构是“他们自己命运的建筑师”(26)。德意志民主共和国希望访问学生致力于社会主义,一些非洲学生确实如此,但大多数学生只是希望进一步发展自己的事业。其他人则支持民主德国所回避的社会主义版本,比如恩克鲁姆主义。共产党和它的青年组织建立了学生团体,比如针对特定国家的大学团体Nationale Hochschulgruppen (NHG),以鼓励适当的社会主义教育,并引发对非洲国家文化和独立的庆祝活动。然而,学生们使用NHGs作为辩论、异议和抗议祖国或民主德国的场所。例如,1962年,几内亚人抗议总统塞库·图尔塞对罢工教师的镇压;1970年,马里学生要求获得访问西方国家的签证。学生团体在国内也因政治和种族差异而分裂,比如一些民主德国的尼日利亚人创建了一个独立的比夫拉俱乐部。由于冷战时期的竞争处于政策决定的前沿,民主德国镇压了学生抗议者,并将他们贴上“暴徒”的标签,以防止他们危及两国关系……
{"title":"African Students in East Germany, 1949–1975 by Sara Pugach (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.a910196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.a910196","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: African Students in East Germany, 1949–1975 by Sara Pugach Katherine Pence African Students in East Germany, 1949–1975. By Sara Pugach. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2022. Pp. ix + 256. Paper $29.95. ISBN 9780472055562. In the Cold War battle for affinities of peoples around the globe, socialist states, such as the German Democratic Republic (GDR), decried ongoing racism and imperialism of the capitalist West and declared themselves as bastions of anti-racism and of solidarity with decolonizing nations in the Global South. One concrete way that East Germany and other Soviet-bloc states practiced this solidarity was by offering African students scholarships to study in university and vocational training programs, so they could return to build up their home countries through technical expertise. Sara Pugach's excellent new book shows that studying in East Germany was much more complicated for African exchange students than the official anti-racist party dogma purported. Using interviews and extensive research in German, British, Kenyan, and Ghanaian archives, Pugach finds that legacies of prewar racism continued into the GDR, creating deep ambivalence toward non-whites there. The book also helpfully analyzes humanitarianism and development aid by focusing not on state-level or European actors but on the perspectives of average students whose scholarships were [End Page 513] one aspect of aid and cultural diplomacy. As such, Pugach's work takes its place among the best new works that analyze the intersection of the Cold War and decolonization. The book is rich in its approach since it straddles both a transnational framework of flows across borders and a micro-history of everyday interactions between East Germans and African students. Pugach has importantly sought out sources giving voice to individual students, and she includes archival photos of the students throughout. Pugach examines African students' experiences from their selection as scholarship recipients through their complex travel routes to East Germany to their life while studying. Chapter One focuses on the first set of eleven students who came from Nigeria in 1951. Other chapters profile subsequent groups from socialist-aligned countries, such as Ghana or Mali, and non-aligned nations, such as Kenya. Pugach maintains the specificity of these diverse contexts, showing how ethnic divisions and changing politics in the home countries affected the students abroad. Chapter Two traces how students traveled through circuitous and difficult routes to East Germany, often through transit hubs such as Cairo. Chapter Three focuses on Ghana to exemplify how African countries selected students for study abroad. The GDR Ministry of Foreign Affairs often worked with local trade missions or government agencies, such as the Ghanaian Scholarships Secretariat, to identify prospective students. Socialist-leaning leaders, such as Ghana's Kwame Nkrumah, and parties, such as Kenya's ZI","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136094210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Peter Sloterdijk, Philosopher of Germany's New Right 彼得·斯洛特戴克,德国新右派哲学家
4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/gsr.2023.a910190
Kumars Salehi
abstract: Philosopher Peter Sloterdijk's popularity among the German New Right is attributable to the fact that his perspective is identifiably conservative while eschewing rote traditionalism and anti-intellectual sloganeering. Sloterdijk portrays his critics as disingenuous or hysterical, but by harnessing the trappings of counterculture to undermine the perceived hegemony of liberal values, Sloterdijk's self-identified "left-conservatism" serves as both a model for the New Right and a gateway to their ideas for a mainstream audience. This paper explores why the primary concern of Sloterdijk's critics is the disinhibiting effect of his interventions on hierarchical instincts constrained by modest progress toward egalitarianism and inclusivity.
哲学家彼得·斯洛特戴克(Peter Sloterdijk)在德国新右翼中受欢迎的原因是他的观点明显保守,同时避免了死记硬背的传统主义和反智口号。斯洛特戴克把他的批评者描绘成虚伪或歇斯底里的人,但通过利用反主流文化的陷阱来破坏自由主义价值观的霸权,斯洛特戴克自我认定的“左翼保守主义”既是新右翼的典范,也是主流受众了解他们思想的门户。本文探讨了为什么斯洛特戴克的批评者主要关注的是他对等级本能的干预的解除抑制作用,这些本能受到平等主义和包容性的适度进步的限制。
{"title":"Peter Sloterdijk, Philosopher of Germany's New Right","authors":"Kumars Salehi","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.a910190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.a910190","url":null,"abstract":"abstract: Philosopher Peter Sloterdijk's popularity among the German New Right is attributable to the fact that his perspective is identifiably conservative while eschewing rote traditionalism and anti-intellectual sloganeering. Sloterdijk portrays his critics as disingenuous or hysterical, but by harnessing the trappings of counterculture to undermine the perceived hegemony of liberal values, Sloterdijk's self-identified \"left-conservatism\" serves as both a model for the New Right and a gateway to their ideas for a mainstream audience. This paper explores why the primary concern of Sloterdijk's critics is the disinhibiting effect of his interventions on hierarchical instincts constrained by modest progress toward egalitarianism and inclusivity.","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136094684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postmemory and Oral History in Josef Winkler's Die Verschleppung and Die Ukrainerin : Njetotschka Iljaschenko erzählt ihre Geschichte 约瑟夫温克勒的死后及口腔历史:尼耶多奇卡•埃莱申科讲述了她的故事
4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/gsr.2023.a910191
William Christopher Burwick
abstract: Josef Winkler's fourth novel, Die Verschleppung. Njetotschka Iljaschenko erzählt ihre ukrainische Kindheit (The deportation: Njetotschka Iljaschenko narrates her Ukrainian childhood, 1983) contributes to the Austrian discourse of trauma narratives, the experience of alterity, and the representation of politically disenfranchised persons and groups, adding the aspect of forced labor, human rights violations with the emphasis on Ukraine, oral history, and postmemory. This article examines the intersection of ethics and language in Winkler's mediation of Iljaschenko's autobiography in Die Verschleppung and the 2022 reprint Die Ukrainerin. Njetotschka Iljaschenko erzählt ihre Geschichte (The Ukrainian. Njetotschka Iljaschenko narrates her story) and explores the challenges facing literary mediation while maintaining fidelity to the historicity of oral history and postmemory.
约瑟夫·温克勒的第四部小说《幻影》。njetoschka Iljaschenko erzählt ihre ukrainische Kindheit(驱逐出境:njetoschka Iljaschenko讲述她的乌克兰童年,1983)对奥地利的创伤叙事、另类体验、政治上被剥夺权利的个人和群体的表现做出了贡献,并增加了强迫劳动、侵犯人权的方面,强调乌克兰、口述历史和后记忆。本文考察了温克勒在《Verschleppung》和2022年重印的《乌克兰人》中对伊尔亚琴科自传的调解中伦理和语言的交集。伊尔亚琴科erzählt乌克兰人。njetoschka Iljaschenko讲述了她的故事,并探索了文学调解面临的挑战,同时保持对口述历史和后记忆的历史性的忠诚。
{"title":"Postmemory and Oral History in Josef Winkler's Die Verschleppung and Die Ukrainerin : Njetotschka Iljaschenko erzählt ihre Geschichte","authors":"William Christopher Burwick","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.a910191","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.a910191","url":null,"abstract":"abstract: Josef Winkler's fourth novel, Die Verschleppung. Njetotschka Iljaschenko erzählt ihre ukrainische Kindheit (The deportation: Njetotschka Iljaschenko narrates her Ukrainian childhood, 1983) contributes to the Austrian discourse of trauma narratives, the experience of alterity, and the representation of politically disenfranchised persons and groups, adding the aspect of forced labor, human rights violations with the emphasis on Ukraine, oral history, and postmemory. This article examines the intersection of ethics and language in Winkler's mediation of Iljaschenko's autobiography in Die Verschleppung and the 2022 reprint Die Ukrainerin. Njetotschka Iljaschenko erzählt ihre Geschichte (The Ukrainian. Njetotschka Iljaschenko narrates her story) and explores the challenges facing literary mediation while maintaining fidelity to the historicity of oral history and postmemory.","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136094208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Germany and the Confessional Divide:Religious Tensions and Political Culture, 1871–1989 ed. by Mark Edward Ruff and Thomas Großbölting (review) 德国和忏悔的鸿沟:宗教紧张和政治文化,1871年至1989年,马克·爱德华·鲁夫和托马斯编Großbölting(评论)
4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/gsr.2023.a910203
Reviewed by: Germany and the Confessional Divide:Religious Tensions and Political Culture, 1871–1989 ed. by Mark Edward Ruff and Thomas Großbölting Jeremy Stephen Roethler Germany and the Confessional Divide: Religious Tensions and Political Culture, 1871–1989. Edited by Mark Edward Ruff and Thomas Großbölting. New York: Berghahn Books, 2022. Pp. viii + 364. Hardback $149.00. ISBN 9781800730878. This collection surveys confessional relations from the inauguration of the Kaiserreich to the fall of the Berlin Wall, during which Germany transitioned from arguably Europe's most hyper-confessionalized polity, when hostility between Protestant and Catholic not only determined national political outcomes but also shaped intimate life, to the other end of the spectrum, when confessional identity hardly mattered, except, as narrated by Großbölting, in the realm of self-deprecating humor (326). The purpose of this collection is to explain why. While the book's title suggests a comprehensive survey, the distribution of chapters is uneven. After an Introduction by editors Ruff and Großbölting, Jeffrey Zalar singularly carries the burden of the Kaiserreich on his able shoulders. In his contribution about "The Kulturkampf and Catholic Identity," Zalar explains how Catholics sought to prove to their hostile liberal and Protestant countrymen that they were just as German as they were. Internal Catholic discourse admitted that Catholic parity required improved Catholic material conditions and culture, thus self-affirming a Protestant and liberal trope about inferior Catholics. Zalar also documents that Catholics used their deep organizational network (then known as the Catholic "milieu") to make their case as dependable Germans, attending national events, for instance, and participating more broadly in the "nationalization of the masses" (borrowing from George Mosse) (31). Compared to the Kaiserreich, the Weimar Republic and the Third Reich receive more extensive coverage. Klaus Große Kracht's piece "The Catholic Kulturfront during the Weimar Republic" demonstrates that even when confronted with a perceived common enemy (Bolshevism), instead of moving closer to their Protestant co-religionists, right-wing Catholics such as Karl Adam, Carl Schmitt, and Franz von Papen pivoted towards fascist authoritarianism instead, with ominous consequences (62–63). It is well-documented that conservative Catholic influencers (for instance, Archbishop Faulhaber of Munich-Freising) railed against the Revolution of 1918/19 and supported Weimar only tepidly; Benedikt Brunner tells the less appreciated story about why the Revolution and Weimar also unhinged conservative Protestants, even if, reflecting the still confessionally charged times, they would not make common cause against Weimar with Catholics. The redoubtable Jürgen Falter makes an appearance in this volume, adding updated detail to account for Catholic voting patterns during the final years of Weimar. He repeats his well
由:德国和忏悔鸿沟:宗教紧张局势和政治文化,1871年至1989年,马克·爱德华·鲁夫和托马斯主编Großbölting杰里米·斯蒂芬·罗特勒德国和忏悔鸿沟:宗教紧张局势和政治文化,1871年至1989年。编辑马克·爱德华·拉夫和托马斯Großbölting。纽约:Berghahn Books, 2022。Pp. viii + 364。精装的149.00美元。ISBN 9781800730878。这本合集调查了从凯撒帝国的落成到柏林墙的倒塌之间的忏悔关系,在此期间,德国从可以说是欧洲最高度忏悔的政体过渡,新教徒和天主教徒之间的敌意不仅决定了国家的政治结果,而且塑造了亲密生活,到另一个极端,忏悔身份几乎不重要,除了Großbölting的叙述,在自嘲幽默的领域(326)。本文的目的是解释其中的原因。虽然这本书的标题暗示了一个全面的调查,但章节的分布并不均衡。经过编辑Ruff和Großbölting的介绍,Jeffrey Zalar在他强壮的肩膀上扛起了凯撒帝国的重担。在他关于“文化斗争和天主教身份认同”的文章中,Zalar解释了天主教徒如何试图向他们敌对的自由派和新教同胞证明他们和他们一样是德国人。天主教内部的话语承认,天主教的平等需要改善天主教的物质条件和文化,从而自我肯定了新教和自由主义关于劣等天主教徒的比喻。Zalar还记录了天主教徒利用他们深厚的组织网络(当时被称为天主教“环境”)使他们成为可靠的德国人,例如,参加国家活动,更广泛地参与“群众国有化”(借用乔治·莫斯)(31)。与德意志帝国相比,魏玛共和国和第三帝国得到了更广泛的报道。Klaus Große Kracht的作品《魏玛共和国时期的天主教文化前线》表明,即使面对一个共同的敌人(布尔什维克主义),右翼天主教徒如卡尔·亚当、卡尔·施密特和弗朗茨·冯·巴本,也没有向他们的新教同道靠拢,而是转向法西斯专制主义,带来了不祥的后果(62-63)。有充分的证据表明,保守的天主教影响者(例如,慕尼黑弗雷因的大主教Faulhaber)反对1918/19年的革命,只是不温不火地支持魏玛;本尼迪克特·布伦纳讲述了一个鲜为人知的故事,讲述了为什么革命和魏玛也使保守的新教徒精神错乱,尽管反映出仍然充满忏悔的时代,他们不会与天主教徒共同反对魏玛。令人敬畏的j rgen Falter在本卷中出现,增加了更新的细节,以说明魏玛最后几年的天主教投票模式。他重复了他著名的论点,即天主教徒比其他人更不可能投票给希特勒。他重申了自己的观点,即天主教对中央党和巴伐利亚人民党(BVP)的组织忠诚解释了原因。但在他早期的研究之后,他继续使用“相对免疫”(120页)这样的语言来解释天主教徒在投票给希特勒或他的政党时的犹豫,仿佛投票给纳粹主义是一种疾病,而不是一种有意识的决定,这种观点在最近的学术研究中已经不受欢迎了。(公平地说,这篇文章是从德语原文翻译成英语的。)很有说服力的是,在下一章“德国普世主义的法西斯起源”中,詹姆斯·查佩尔反驳说,“不能再坚持认为天主教提供了某种抵抗纳粹主义的免疫力”(129)。如果天主教徒投票反对纳粹,那并不必然是因为他们是天主教徒。澄清一点,查佩尔的论点并不是1945年后联邦共和国的教派间合作起源于1945年前与法西斯主义的教派间合作(正如标题所暗示的那样);相反,他揭穿了基督教民主联盟代表德国第一个跨党派突破的神话;这个“荣誉”(我的话)不幸属于纳粹党(126)。这个收藏把最好的作品放在了1945年后的最后,这不仅仅是因为它填补了一个空白。玛丽亚·米切尔(Maria Mitchell)记录了基民盟女性活动家在联邦共和国成立初期对基督教优先事项(如重建家庭)的影响;不幸的是……
{"title":"Germany and the Confessional Divide:Religious Tensions and Political Culture, 1871–1989 ed. by Mark Edward Ruff and Thomas Großbölting (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.a910203","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.a910203","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Germany and the Confessional Divide:Religious Tensions and Political Culture, 1871–1989 ed. by Mark Edward Ruff and Thomas Großbölting Jeremy Stephen Roethler Germany and the Confessional Divide: Religious Tensions and Political Culture, 1871–1989. Edited by Mark Edward Ruff and Thomas Großbölting. New York: Berghahn Books, 2022. Pp. viii + 364. Hardback $149.00. ISBN 9781800730878. This collection surveys confessional relations from the inauguration of the Kaiserreich to the fall of the Berlin Wall, during which Germany transitioned from arguably Europe's most hyper-confessionalized polity, when hostility between Protestant and Catholic not only determined national political outcomes but also shaped intimate life, to the other end of the spectrum, when confessional identity hardly mattered, except, as narrated by Großbölting, in the realm of self-deprecating humor (326). The purpose of this collection is to explain why. While the book's title suggests a comprehensive survey, the distribution of chapters is uneven. After an Introduction by editors Ruff and Großbölting, Jeffrey Zalar singularly carries the burden of the Kaiserreich on his able shoulders. In his contribution about \"The Kulturkampf and Catholic Identity,\" Zalar explains how Catholics sought to prove to their hostile liberal and Protestant countrymen that they were just as German as they were. Internal Catholic discourse admitted that Catholic parity required improved Catholic material conditions and culture, thus self-affirming a Protestant and liberal trope about inferior Catholics. Zalar also documents that Catholics used their deep organizational network (then known as the Catholic \"milieu\") to make their case as dependable Germans, attending national events, for instance, and participating more broadly in the \"nationalization of the masses\" (borrowing from George Mosse) (31). Compared to the Kaiserreich, the Weimar Republic and the Third Reich receive more extensive coverage. Klaus Große Kracht's piece \"The Catholic Kulturfront during the Weimar Republic\" demonstrates that even when confronted with a perceived common enemy (Bolshevism), instead of moving closer to their Protestant co-religionists, right-wing Catholics such as Karl Adam, Carl Schmitt, and Franz von Papen pivoted towards fascist authoritarianism instead, with ominous consequences (62–63). It is well-documented that conservative Catholic influencers (for instance, Archbishop Faulhaber of Munich-Freising) railed against the Revolution of 1918/19 and supported Weimar only tepidly; Benedikt Brunner tells the less appreciated story about why the Revolution and Weimar also unhinged conservative Protestants, even if, reflecting the still confessionally charged times, they would not make common cause against Weimar with Catholics. The redoubtable Jürgen Falter makes an appearance in this volume, adding updated detail to account for Catholic voting patterns during the final years of Weimar. He repeats his well","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136094950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
February 1933: The Winter of Literature by Uwe Wittstock (review) 1933年2月:乌韦·维特施托克的《文学的冬天》(书评)
4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/gsr.2023.a910207
Reviewed by: February 1933: The Winter of Literature by Uwe Wittstock Paul Michael Lützeler February 1933: The Winter of Literature. By Uwe Wittstock. Translated by Daniel Bowles. Hoboken, NJ: Polity Press, 2023. Pp. ix + 278. Cloth $29.95. ISBN 9781509553792. Uwe Wittstock hat mit seinem Buch über die Flucht der Hitlergegner in den ersten Wochen der Naziherrschaft eine Studie veröffentlicht, die bei den zeitgeschichtlich interessierten Mitgliedern der GSA auf großes Interesse stoßen wird. Es geht hier nicht nur um das Schicksal von Autor*innen, die in mehr oder weniger fremde Länder verbannt werden, sondern auch um ein historisches Lehrstück über die unglaublich schnelle Verwandlung einer liberalen Demokratie in ihr politisches Gegenteil: die terroristische Diktatur. Innerhalb von sechs Wochen werden die wirkungsmächtigsten Repräsentant*innen der deutschen Literatur der Weimarer Republik vertrieben—man denke an Bertolt Brecht, Alfred Döblin, Lion Feuchtwanger, Oskar Maria Graf, Mascha Kaléko, Else Lasker-Schüler, Heinrich und Thomas Mann, Erika und Klaus Mann, Erich Maria Remarque, Gabriele Tergit, Ernst Toller, Carl Zuckmayer. Das geschieht, weil ein föderativ organisierter Rechtsstaat durch einen zentralistisch strukturierten Terrorapparat ersetzt wird. Nach der Ernennung Hitlers zum Reichskanzler am 30. Januar 1933 unterzeichnet Reichspräsident Hindenburg alle vom "Führer" der Nationalsozialisten gewünschten sogenannten Notverordnungen. Der Präsident gibt auch dem Drängen des Kanzlers nach, Neuwahlen fünf Wochen später anzusetzen. Von freien Wahlen kann da schon nicht mehr die Rede sein, weil Hitler die gegnerischen Parteien Parteien (Zentrum, SPD, KPD) massiv im Wahlkampf behindert und für seine NSDAP alle nur denkbaren staatlichen Mittel für propagandistische Zwecke missbraucht. Zudem füllen Industrielle die leeren Kassen der Hitlerpartei. Wittstock schildert den rasanten gesellschaftlich-politischen Umbruch von Tag zu Tag, von Woche zu Woche. Das Bemerkenswerte ist, dass er die Gleichzeitigkeit der erfolgreichen Schachzüge Hitlers und der ständig scheiternden Versuche von Opposition und Widerstand in Erinnerung ruft. In Hitlers Partei gilt das Führerprinzip: seine Stör-, Verfolgungs- und Verhaftungsbefehle werden von SA und SS sofort befolgt. In der Sektion Dichtung der Preußischen Akademie der Künste will ihr Vorsitzender [End Page 503] Heinrich Mann sich nicht zu Loyalitätserklärungen Hitler gegenüber erpressen lassen. Er tritt zurück, überlässt aber dadurch das Schicksal seiner Akademie-Sektion dem Nationalsozialisten Hanns Jost und dem Mitläufer Gottfried Benn. Noch nie ist in der Literaturgeschichte so genau im Zusammenhang beschrieben worden, wie, auf welche Weise, mit welchen Mitteln und bei Berücksichtigung der familiären Verhältnisse fast gleichzeitig Autor*innen oder Verleger, Kritiker*innen und Akademieangehörige die Flucht vor der neuen Diktatur ergreifen. Zuweilen helfen nur rasche Geistesgegenwart oder glückliche Umstände, di
peter:二月:使节度过的文具之冬保尔•麦可•吕特斯•1933:文具之冬。太好了!真实的故事霍博肯,纽约日报,2023年普雷斯有利Cloth 29.95美元.书9781509553792 .Uwe witt斯托克在其著作《纳粹统治的前几周希特勒的逃亡》中发表了一项研究,研究结果将会引起许多嗯历史的关注。作者*被放逐到或多或少都是外国作者,而且,这也是一个关于自由民主如何以令人难以置信的速度将其转化为政治反转:恐怖主义独裁的历史教科书。在六个星期内将wirkungsmächtigsten *代表里面的德国魏玛共和国的文学vertrieben-man想到Bertolt布,阿尔弗雷德Döblin狮Feuchtwanger,奥斯卡玛丽亚伯爵,玛莎凯é柯震东换Lasker-Schüler海因里希和托马斯曼埃丽卡和Klaus的丈夫,埃里希·玛利亚",埃Tergit真的很棒,卡尔Zuckmayer .这是因为一种中央集权的恐怖主义机器取代了法制联邦制国家。日希特勒被任命为总理1933年1月,德国总统兴登堡在“纳粹元首”签署了紧急法令。总统还施压要在五周后举行新选举既然希特勒在竞选中大力阻挠敌对政党(中央、社民党、KPD),并利用所有可能的政府资金用于宣传目的,那么就不能说自由选举了。此外,工业装满了希特勒政党的空钱箱。温特斯托克描绘了社会和政治的变化,每天都加速,每周都加速。值得注意的是,他同时也想起了希特勒的成功行动以及反对派和反对派的不断失败努力。希特勒的党首有这样的制度:刺、跟踪和逮捕指令由国家安全局和纳粹立即执行。在普鲁斯艺术学院创设区,它的主席[德门503]格兰特先生不想再被迫效忠希特勒。他辞职了把自己学术部门的命运留给了纳粹党人汉尼斯·佐斯特和随行者戈特弗里德·本恩历史上还从未有人如此精确地叙述,在如何、以什么方式、用什么手段,以及如何同时兼顾家庭关系的情况下,作家、出版商、批评家、学者和学者们都逃离新的独裁政府。有时,我们只能帮助迅速的头脑或碰运气,让边界能够跨越。亨利·曼知道在霍尔海关呆过的只有lax海关人员;威利·明森伯格发现,德国一边在萨尔行进时(当时是法国政府操纵的)几乎忽略了海关壁垒,因为他们认为这是德国帝国的一部分。两个作者都安全地逃到了法国在布拉格、慕尼黑、维也纳、苏黎世和米兰之间的长途线路,难民们从那里开始他们的旅程,到不知名的地方。如今,这是件正确的事——在纽约市交通点被毁近80年后——我们应该在那里建一个旅游博物馆。)一些还年轻但已经熟悉的左Autoren-wie埃贡Erwin Kisch而ès Sperber-sind前捷克斯洛伐克公民,被逮捕并送进所谓的“野蛮人”集中营,却要比外国人被从监狱释放:人们把她叫回布拉格. Wittstock提到也进一步Exilstationen *作者几年里面,因为已经在成为Fluchtorte萨尔茨堡、维也纳、布拉格米兰、巴黎、阿姆斯特丹、布鲁塞尔、哥本哈根和莫斯科(特别是Hitler-Stalin-Pakts)的时间也比下降,那些你想尽快摆脱,无论是以伦敦、纽约、耶路撒冷或上海.在每一章中,关于个别作家逃难的情节,这里都有维特史托的一些资料,这些资料记录了多年来纳粹组织的内战。
{"title":"February 1933: The Winter of Literature by Uwe Wittstock (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.a910207","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.a910207","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: February 1933: The Winter of Literature by Uwe Wittstock Paul Michael Lützeler February 1933: The Winter of Literature. By Uwe Wittstock. Translated by Daniel Bowles. Hoboken, NJ: Polity Press, 2023. Pp. ix + 278. Cloth $29.95. ISBN 9781509553792. Uwe Wittstock hat mit seinem Buch über die Flucht der Hitlergegner in den ersten Wochen der Naziherrschaft eine Studie veröffentlicht, die bei den zeitgeschichtlich interessierten Mitgliedern der GSA auf großes Interesse stoßen wird. Es geht hier nicht nur um das Schicksal von Autor*innen, die in mehr oder weniger fremde Länder verbannt werden, sondern auch um ein historisches Lehrstück über die unglaublich schnelle Verwandlung einer liberalen Demokratie in ihr politisches Gegenteil: die terroristische Diktatur. Innerhalb von sechs Wochen werden die wirkungsmächtigsten Repräsentant*innen der deutschen Literatur der Weimarer Republik vertrieben—man denke an Bertolt Brecht, Alfred Döblin, Lion Feuchtwanger, Oskar Maria Graf, Mascha Kaléko, Else Lasker-Schüler, Heinrich und Thomas Mann, Erika und Klaus Mann, Erich Maria Remarque, Gabriele Tergit, Ernst Toller, Carl Zuckmayer. Das geschieht, weil ein föderativ organisierter Rechtsstaat durch einen zentralistisch strukturierten Terrorapparat ersetzt wird. Nach der Ernennung Hitlers zum Reichskanzler am 30. Januar 1933 unterzeichnet Reichspräsident Hindenburg alle vom \"Führer\" der Nationalsozialisten gewünschten sogenannten Notverordnungen. Der Präsident gibt auch dem Drängen des Kanzlers nach, Neuwahlen fünf Wochen später anzusetzen. Von freien Wahlen kann da schon nicht mehr die Rede sein, weil Hitler die gegnerischen Parteien Parteien (Zentrum, SPD, KPD) massiv im Wahlkampf behindert und für seine NSDAP alle nur denkbaren staatlichen Mittel für propagandistische Zwecke missbraucht. Zudem füllen Industrielle die leeren Kassen der Hitlerpartei. Wittstock schildert den rasanten gesellschaftlich-politischen Umbruch von Tag zu Tag, von Woche zu Woche. Das Bemerkenswerte ist, dass er die Gleichzeitigkeit der erfolgreichen Schachzüge Hitlers und der ständig scheiternden Versuche von Opposition und Widerstand in Erinnerung ruft. In Hitlers Partei gilt das Führerprinzip: seine Stör-, Verfolgungs- und Verhaftungsbefehle werden von SA und SS sofort befolgt. In der Sektion Dichtung der Preußischen Akademie der Künste will ihr Vorsitzender [End Page 503] Heinrich Mann sich nicht zu Loyalitätserklärungen Hitler gegenüber erpressen lassen. Er tritt zurück, überlässt aber dadurch das Schicksal seiner Akademie-Sektion dem Nationalsozialisten Hanns Jost und dem Mitläufer Gottfried Benn. Noch nie ist in der Literaturgeschichte so genau im Zusammenhang beschrieben worden, wie, auf welche Weise, mit welchen Mitteln und bei Berücksichtigung der familiären Verhältnisse fast gleichzeitig Autor*innen oder Verleger, Kritiker*innen und Akademieangehörige die Flucht vor der neuen Diktatur ergreifen. Zuweilen helfen nur rasche Geistesgegenwart oder glückliche Umstände, di","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136094959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Philology of Life: Walter Benjamin's Critical Program by Kevin McLaughlin (review) 《生命文字学:沃尔特·本雅明的批判纲领》凯文·麦克劳克林著(书评)
4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/gsr.2023.a910206
Reviewed by: The Philology of Life: Walter Benjamin's Critical Program by Kevin McLaughlin Esther Leslie The Philology of Life: Walter Benjamin's Critical Program. By Kevin McLaughlin. New York: Fordham University Press, 2023. Pp. iv + 208. Paper $32.00. ISBN 9781531501693. This book is a concentrated contribution to the diverse field of Walter Benjamin studies, a crowded field but one that endlessly offers unploughed vistas, lending credence to Benjamin's own concern with the unfurling afterlife of works. Kevin McLaughlin's new study is about the life of creative work and its relation to life in general, as theorized by Benjamin in the early part of his writerly career, through essays written at a point when he was still a student under the umbrella of the university. Across three chapters, McLaughlin's study focuses on Benjamin's essay on two poems by Friedrich Hölderlin, "Timidity" and "The Poet's Courage," written around the start of World War I; "The Concept of Criticism in German Romanticism," Benjamin's PhD dissertation, submitted in 1919; and the long essay "Goethe's Elective Affinities," written around 1924, just before Benjamin was compelled to strike out as an independent scholar. These writings by Benjamin are compact, difficult works in which are developed and extended critical vocabularies of truth, myth, the poeticized, inner form and content, and so on. McLaughlin's central interest is in the ways in which the critical works initiate discussions of what he conceives of as a specifically Benjaminian take on the idea of the Book of Life. This is worked through in relation to a concept of densely layered textures in language, which evokes a complex notion of Geschichte (history or story), understood critically through its core embedded word Schicht or layer. McLaughlin's study undertakes an unpicking of terms, focusing on questions that revolve, in complex and unpredictable ways, around language. This is unsurprising. As well as being a renowned commentator and critic of Benjamin's contribution, McLaughlin is also one of the translators of Benjamin's Arcades Project. He has stared deeply into words, divining in them panoplies of connotation and resonance. Under investigation here is the meaning of the word philology, or more [End Page 501] broadly, the resources of the practice of philology for opening texts up to historical understanding, which means an opening up to lived life. Equally under examination are the caverns of meaning in the small word life and the ways in which it multiplies and repeatedly extends in Benjamin's work as Lebenden, Erdleben, Fortleben, and so on. How to translate these terms is put under pressure here: life, living, life on Earth, and continuing life might be only some ways of rendering the conceptual heft of these terms in English. To be attentive to resonances is to be alert to what theoretical insights are carried across in translations. A compound word used by Benjamin lends the book its title: Lebens
《生命文献学:沃尔特·本雅明的批判纲领》作者:凯文·麦克劳克林·埃丝特·莱斯利凯文·麦克劳克林著。纽约:福特汉姆大学出版社,2023。页4 + 208。论文32.00美元。ISBN 9781531501693。这本书是对瓦尔特·本雅明研究领域的集中贡献,这是一个拥挤的领域,但它无休止地提供了未开发的前景,为本雅明自己对作品展开的来世的关注提供了证据。凯文·麦克劳克林(Kevin McLaughlin)的新研究是关于创造性工作的生活及其与一般生活的关系,正如本杰明(Benjamin)在其写作生涯早期所写的论文中所提出的那样,当时他还是一名大学学生。麦克劳克林的研究集中在本雅明对弗里德里希Hölderlin的两首诗的评论上,这两首诗分别是《胆怯》和《诗人的勇气》,写于第一次世界大战开始前后;《德国浪漫主义中的批评概念》,本雅明1919年提交的博士论文;以及写于1924年左右的长文《歌德的选择性亲缘》(Goethe’s选修亲缘),就在本杰明被迫成为一名独立学者之前。本雅明的这些著作是紧凑的,困难的作品,其中发展和扩展了真理,神话,诗化,内在形式和内容等批判词汇。麦克劳克林的核心兴趣在于,这些批评作品如何引发了他所认为的本杰明主义对《生命之书》的具体看法的讨论。这与语言中密集分层结构的概念有关,它唤起了历史或故事的复杂概念,通过其核心嵌入词Schicht或layer来批判性地理解。麦克劳克林的研究对术语进行了拆解,聚焦于以复杂而不可预测的方式围绕语言展开的问题。这不足为奇。麦克劳克林不仅是本雅明贡献的著名评论家和批评家,也是本雅明“拱廊计划”的译者之一。他对文字进行了深入的研究,在其中预言了内涵和共鸣的全貌。这里研究的是文献学这个词的意义,或者更广泛地说,是文献学实践的资源,为历史理解打开文本,这意味着对生活的开放。同样,本雅明也在研究“生活”这个小词中的意义洞穴,以及它在本雅明的作品中以“生”、“生”、“生”等形式繁殖和反复扩展的方式。如何翻译这些术语在这里很有压力:生命、生活、地球上的生命和持续的生命可能只是英语中这些术语的概念分量的一些表达方式。注意共鸣就是要警惕翻译中所传达的理论见解。本雅明使用的一个复合词借用了这本书的名字:Lebensphilologie。McLaughlin问这个词是否被翻译成英语。对他来说,概念化这本书背后的内容就是理解这本书作者的特殊贡献。这本书的副标题指的是瓦尔特·本雅明的批判纲领,可以理解为生命的文献学。本雅明是一位批评家,他在这一时期发展了,一种对批评能力的纲领性认识,这种认识贯穿了他作为评论家的余生。麦克劳克林在结尾处简要概述了批评在本雅明晚年生活中的一些重要细节。对本雅明来说,正如麦克劳克林所强调的那样,批判活动意味着探索文学,将其作为概念化生活的过去、未来和未来的一种资源。这包括理解人类和文化科学的传承,因为宗教思想传承下来,但也找到了进入人类和文化科学的方式。正是从这些语境中,生活的感觉才像一本书一样被收集起来。在这个形象的圣经版本中,生命册上写着那些将被拯救的人的名字。本杰明,我们被告知,更感兴趣的是保存未写的东西或挤出新的……
{"title":"The Philology of Life: Walter Benjamin's Critical Program by Kevin McLaughlin (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.a910206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.a910206","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: The Philology of Life: Walter Benjamin's Critical Program by Kevin McLaughlin Esther Leslie The Philology of Life: Walter Benjamin's Critical Program. By Kevin McLaughlin. New York: Fordham University Press, 2023. Pp. iv + 208. Paper $32.00. ISBN 9781531501693. This book is a concentrated contribution to the diverse field of Walter Benjamin studies, a crowded field but one that endlessly offers unploughed vistas, lending credence to Benjamin's own concern with the unfurling afterlife of works. Kevin McLaughlin's new study is about the life of creative work and its relation to life in general, as theorized by Benjamin in the early part of his writerly career, through essays written at a point when he was still a student under the umbrella of the university. Across three chapters, McLaughlin's study focuses on Benjamin's essay on two poems by Friedrich Hölderlin, \"Timidity\" and \"The Poet's Courage,\" written around the start of World War I; \"The Concept of Criticism in German Romanticism,\" Benjamin's PhD dissertation, submitted in 1919; and the long essay \"Goethe's Elective Affinities,\" written around 1924, just before Benjamin was compelled to strike out as an independent scholar. These writings by Benjamin are compact, difficult works in which are developed and extended critical vocabularies of truth, myth, the poeticized, inner form and content, and so on. McLaughlin's central interest is in the ways in which the critical works initiate discussions of what he conceives of as a specifically Benjaminian take on the idea of the Book of Life. This is worked through in relation to a concept of densely layered textures in language, which evokes a complex notion of Geschichte (history or story), understood critically through its core embedded word Schicht or layer. McLaughlin's study undertakes an unpicking of terms, focusing on questions that revolve, in complex and unpredictable ways, around language. This is unsurprising. As well as being a renowned commentator and critic of Benjamin's contribution, McLaughlin is also one of the translators of Benjamin's Arcades Project. He has stared deeply into words, divining in them panoplies of connotation and resonance. Under investigation here is the meaning of the word philology, or more [End Page 501] broadly, the resources of the practice of philology for opening texts up to historical understanding, which means an opening up to lived life. Equally under examination are the caverns of meaning in the small word life and the ways in which it multiplies and repeatedly extends in Benjamin's work as Lebenden, Erdleben, Fortleben, and so on. How to translate these terms is put under pressure here: life, living, life on Earth, and continuing life might be only some ways of rendering the conceptual heft of these terms in English. To be attentive to resonances is to be alert to what theoretical insights are carried across in translations. A compound word used by Benjamin lends the book its title: Lebens","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136093894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin by Bettina Stoetzer (review) 《野性城市:柏林的移民、种族和城市自然生态》贝蒂娜·施托策著(书评)
4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/gsr.2023.a910198
Reviewed by: Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin by Bettina Stoetzer Thomas Sullivan Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin. By Bettina Stoetzer. Durham: Duke University Press, 2022. Pp. xvii + 328. Paper $28.95. ISBN 9781478018605. Ruins, voids, and overgrown spaces have long been a distinctive feature of Berlin's built environment. Scarred by massive destruction during World War II, divided during the Cold War, and then subject to major development and speculation following [End Page 517] reunification, Berlin has been shaped by cyclical patterns of rupture, destruction, and re-imagination. Repeated regenerations produced a city, over time, with fragmented gaps that often became overgrown, hosting spontaneous, ever-evolving botanical communities. Within these spaces of ruination and spontaneous growth, unplanned and unique environments emerged, combining expected plant and animal species with "unexpected newcomers": non-native species arriving via war, displacement, migration, and trade (37). The study of these sites by celebrated urban ecologist Herbert Sukopp and his collaborators made Berlin a center for the study of "ruderal ecologies": unexpected, unplanned, and unpredictable assemblages of plants and animals spontaneously emerging within disturbed urban spaces. A substantial number of scholarly publications, including recent books such as Jens Lachmund's Greening Berlin: The Co-production of Science, Politics, and Urban Nature (2013) and Matthew Gandy's Natura Urbana: Ecological Constellations in Urban Space (2022), have further examined and analyzed these spaces. Bettina Stoetzer's book, Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin (2022), similarly takes Berlin's ruderal ecologies as a starting point but utilizes them in a new way, arguing that they offer an alternate way of examining urban life and processes. Positing that ruination and rubble are "central to the urban landscapes we inhabit" and the constant product of "social exclusions, capitalist urbanization, and profound environmental change," Stoetzer proposes and advocates the use of a "ruderal analytic" (25–26). Building on the ecological understanding of the term, Stoetzer conceptualizes "ruderal" organisms as arising in conditions of hybridity, disturbance, and inhospitableness. The ruderal, then, is "neither wild nor domesticated" and arises as the product of "juxtapositions of contrasting environments" (4). This conceptualization of ruderal-as-analytic echoes the ecological version in multiple ways. Just as ruderal plants arise in disparate, in-between, and unexpected spaces, a ruderal analytic encourages an ethnographic approach focused on "catching glimpses of seemingly disparate worlds" (5) and focuses attention on the gaps and cracks of modern urban life (25). Echoing the hybridity of ruderal plants, which often trouble categorization, this approach calls on researchers to quest
作者:贝蒂娜·施托策(Bettina Stoetzer),托马斯·沙利文(Thomas Sullivan)。作者:Ruderal City:移民、种族和城市自然的生态学。贝蒂娜·斯托策著。杜伦:杜克大学出版社,2022。第17 + 328页。论文28.95美元。ISBN 9781478018605。废墟、空洞和杂草丛生的空间长期以来一直是柏林建筑环境的鲜明特征。第二次世界大战期间的大规模破坏留下了疤痕,冷战期间分裂,然后在统一后受到重大发展和猜测的影响,柏林已经被破裂,破坏和重新想象的周期性模式所塑造。随着时间的推移,重复的再生产生了一个城市,其中有碎片化的空隙,经常变得杂草丛生,承载着自发的、不断进化的植物群落。在这些毁灭和自发生长的空间中,出现了计划外和独特的环境,将预期的动植物物种与“意想不到的新来者”结合在一起:通过战争、流离失所、迁徙和贸易到达的非本地物种(37)。著名的城市生态学家Herbert Sukopp和他的合作者对这些地点的研究使柏林成为“原始生态学”的研究中心:意外的、计划外的、不可预测的植物和动物的集合自发地出现在受干扰的城市空间中。大量的学术出版物,包括最近出版的延斯·拉赫蒙德的《绿化柏林:科学、政治和城市自然的共同生产》(2013年)和马修·甘迪的《自然城市:城市空间中的生态星座》(2022年),都进一步研究和分析了这些空间。Bettina Stoetzer的书《野蛮的城市:柏林的移民、种族和城市自然生态》(2022)同样以柏林的野蛮生态为出发点,但以一种新的方式利用它们,认为它们提供了一种审视城市生活和过程的替代方法。假定废墟和瓦砾是“我们居住的城市景观的核心”,是“社会排斥、资本主义城市化和深刻的环境变化”的持续产物,斯托策建议并提倡使用“粗糙分析”(25-26)。基于对这个术语的生态学理解,斯托策将“野蛮”生物概念化为在混杂、干扰和不适宜居住的条件下产生的生物。因此,野蛮人“既不是野生的,也不是驯化的”,并且作为“对比环境并置”的产物而出现(4)。野蛮人作为分析者的这种概念化以多种方式与生态版本相呼应。就像野生植物出现在不同的、中间的和意想不到的空间一样,野生分析鼓励一种民族志方法,专注于“捕捉看似不同的世界的一瞥”(5),并将注意力集中在现代城市生活的差距和裂缝上(25)。与通常难以分类的野生植物的杂交性相呼应,这种方法要求研究人员质疑明确的概念区别、包万象的术语以及关于城市生活和空间的总体观点。或者,它提倡阐明复杂性,接受部分答案,并将故事片段组合起来,想象城市生活之外的新可能性。就像野生植物在不同的环境中自发产生,但可能有相关的起源一样,野生植物的杂交性也鼓励了一种多地点的方法,提倡收集许多故事,然后“寻找地点之间的联系,追踪关系”,这可能会提出新的理解或可能性(26-27)。为了证明这种“总体分析”,施托策对柏林及其腹地的多个地点进行了引人入胜的民族志分析,阐明了自然在种族化政治、移民过程和德国国家形成过程中的作用。通过对森林、公园和城市花园中各种参与者的访谈和参与观察,施托策研究了城市自然场所是如何被制造和改造的,是如何被争夺和重新想象的,是如何被管理和占领的,所有这些都是以重新配置不平等、使人们和实践种族化、加强国家边界的方式进行的(6)。在介绍了柏林、支撑本书的实地调查和“乡村”概念之后,施托策分为四个部分。首先,她通过粘鹅脚(Chenopodium botrys)的例子,探索了柏林作为一个乡土生态遗址的历史,这种乡土植物在第二次世界大战后的柏林出人意料地茁壮成长。以这个物种为例,施托策记录了自然在柏林和德意志民族的形成和重塑中所扮演的角色。以下三章分别分析了不同类型的城市自然遗址中的多地点实地考察:
{"title":"Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin by Bettina Stoetzer (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.a910198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.a910198","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin by Bettina Stoetzer Thomas Sullivan Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin. By Bettina Stoetzer. Durham: Duke University Press, 2022. Pp. xvii + 328. Paper $28.95. ISBN 9781478018605. Ruins, voids, and overgrown spaces have long been a distinctive feature of Berlin's built environment. Scarred by massive destruction during World War II, divided during the Cold War, and then subject to major development and speculation following [End Page 517] reunification, Berlin has been shaped by cyclical patterns of rupture, destruction, and re-imagination. Repeated regenerations produced a city, over time, with fragmented gaps that often became overgrown, hosting spontaneous, ever-evolving botanical communities. Within these spaces of ruination and spontaneous growth, unplanned and unique environments emerged, combining expected plant and animal species with \"unexpected newcomers\": non-native species arriving via war, displacement, migration, and trade (37). The study of these sites by celebrated urban ecologist Herbert Sukopp and his collaborators made Berlin a center for the study of \"ruderal ecologies\": unexpected, unplanned, and unpredictable assemblages of plants and animals spontaneously emerging within disturbed urban spaces. A substantial number of scholarly publications, including recent books such as Jens Lachmund's Greening Berlin: The Co-production of Science, Politics, and Urban Nature (2013) and Matthew Gandy's Natura Urbana: Ecological Constellations in Urban Space (2022), have further examined and analyzed these spaces. Bettina Stoetzer's book, Ruderal City: Ecologies of Migration, Race, and Urban Nature in Berlin (2022), similarly takes Berlin's ruderal ecologies as a starting point but utilizes them in a new way, arguing that they offer an alternate way of examining urban life and processes. Positing that ruination and rubble are \"central to the urban landscapes we inhabit\" and the constant product of \"social exclusions, capitalist urbanization, and profound environmental change,\" Stoetzer proposes and advocates the use of a \"ruderal analytic\" (25–26). Building on the ecological understanding of the term, Stoetzer conceptualizes \"ruderal\" organisms as arising in conditions of hybridity, disturbance, and inhospitableness. The ruderal, then, is \"neither wild nor domesticated\" and arises as the product of \"juxtapositions of contrasting environments\" (4). This conceptualization of ruderal-as-analytic echoes the ecological version in multiple ways. Just as ruderal plants arise in disparate, in-between, and unexpected spaces, a ruderal analytic encourages an ethnographic approach focused on \"catching glimpses of seemingly disparate worlds\" (5) and focuses attention on the gaps and cracks of modern urban life (25). Echoing the hybridity of ruderal plants, which often trouble categorization, this approach calls on researchers to quest","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136094035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contrasting Ways of Knowing: Overlapping Epistemologies in the Thought and Lives of Ernst Bloch and Rudolf Steiner 认识方式的对比:恩斯特·布洛赫和鲁道夫·施泰纳思想与生活中的重叠认识论
4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/gsr.2023.a910187
Henry Holland
abstract: First Theodor Adorno in 1965, and then a second wave of scholars in the 1980s, noted that the philosopher Ernst Bloch (1885–1977) engaged substantially with theosophy, particularly when young. This included Bloch's critique of the new religious movement anthroposophy, which some see as an offshoot of theosophy, and of anthroposophy's founder, Rudolf Steiner (1861–1925). I address the lack of English publications on the content of this engagement, and integrate other current questions about Steiner, including the centrality of racism to his whole philosophy. Comparing Bloch's epistemology with Steiner's ultimately reveals much that is irreconcilable, alongside significant points of convergence.
首先是1965年的西奥多·阿多诺(Theodor Adorno),然后是20世纪80年代的第二波学者,他们注意到哲学家恩斯特·布洛赫(Ernst Bloch, 1885-1977)在很大程度上研究了神智学,尤其是在年轻的时候。这包括布洛赫对新宗教运动人智学的批评,有些人认为这是神智学的一个分支,以及人智学的创始人鲁道夫斯坦纳(1861-1925)。我解决了关于这种接触的内容缺乏英文出版物的问题,并整合了关于斯坦纳的其他当前问题,包括种族主义在他的整个哲学中的中心地位。将布洛赫的认识论与施泰纳的认识论进行比较,最终揭示了许多不可调和的东西,以及重要的趋同点。
{"title":"Contrasting Ways of Knowing: Overlapping Epistemologies in the Thought and Lives of Ernst Bloch and Rudolf Steiner","authors":"Henry Holland","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.a910187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.a910187","url":null,"abstract":"abstract: First Theodor Adorno in 1965, and then a second wave of scholars in the 1980s, noted that the philosopher Ernst Bloch (1885–1977) engaged substantially with theosophy, particularly when young. This included Bloch's critique of the new religious movement anthroposophy, which some see as an offshoot of theosophy, and of anthroposophy's founder, Rudolf Steiner (1861–1925). I address the lack of English publications on the content of this engagement, and integrate other current questions about Steiner, including the centrality of racism to his whole philosophy. Comparing Bloch's epistemology with Steiner's ultimately reveals much that is irreconcilable, alongside significant points of convergence.","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136094824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Plants, Places, and Power: Toward Social and Ecological Justice in German Literature and Film by Maria Stehle (review) 植物、地点与权力:德国文学与电影中的社会与生态正义
4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/gsr.2023.a910199
Reviewed by: Plants, Places, and Power: Toward Social and Ecological Justice in German Literature and Film by Maria Stehle Joela Jacobs Plants, Places, and Power: Toward Social and Ecological Justice in German Literature and Film. By Maria Stehle. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2023. Pp. 186. Cloth $99.00. ISBN 9781640141254. Maria Stehle's Plants, Places, and Power tackles the complex intersection of land and belonging in the German context, which brings together the reverberations of the Nazi Blut und Boden legacy as well as European colonizer history with the critical urgency of the environmental future. By examining contemporary literature and film with feminist and anti-racist tools, the book aims to put forward intersectional models of relating to places that are both socially and ecologically just. In doing so, Stehle highlights topographies, the layers of history that shape places in myriad ways, and she emphasizes that place-making entails the resignification of such meanings. In other words, she shows how the figures in her primary sources both fail and succeed in inclusive place-making for themselves and others. While some of them fail because of their violent colonizer approaches or because they continue to center whiteness, others stubbornly hold on to new places after the loss of their home or defiantly make place for themselves despite repeated rejection and thus change who gets to belong. In Stehle's own words, "to make place is to form new kinds of interrelations" (160). The new alliances and ways of kin-making that go along with this process involve not just other people but landscapes, gardens, and forests, as well as parks, cemeteries, and greenhouses, which are summed up in the book's titular focus on plants in the plural. While this is not necessarily an approach to plants for their own sake or in their species specificity (with the fascinating exception of the pencil cactus in chapter five), it is a tool to read texts and people in and through nature toward both social and environmental justice. In practice, this can entail a historical or environmental analysis of background landscapes and rural spaces, or the cultural and aesthetic significance of flowers, fruit, or potted plants, while on other occasions, it involves the unpacking of pervasive metaphors of belonging such as roots and stem. In doing so, Stehle reminds us that plants are everywhere and worth paying attention to because they are productive lenses for analysis—and what's more, that plants can be political actors in relationships of care and collaboration. In addition to its combined methodological focus on social and ecological justice, the book's second stated goal is the expansion of the canon of German studies materials in antiracist, feminist, and decolonizing ways. The primary works Stehle analyzes are all composed by artists who identify as female, queer, of color, and/or [End Page 520] have experienced forced migration, and they range from Juli Zeh and
《植物、地点与权力:走向德国文学与电影中的社会与生态正义》作者:Maria Stehle Joela Jacobs作者:Maria Stehle纽约州罗切斯特:卡姆登之家,2023年。186页。布99.00美元。ISBN 9781640141254。Maria Stehle的《植物、地点和权力》在德国的背景下处理了土地和归属的复杂交集,它将纳粹Blut和Boden遗产的回响以及欧洲殖民者的历史与环境未来的关键紧迫性结合在一起。通过用女权主义和反种族主义的工具审视当代文学和电影,这本书旨在提出与社会和生态公正的地方相关的交叉模式。在这样做的过程中,Stehle强调了地形,以各种方式塑造地方的历史层次,她强调了地方的创造需要这些意义的重新定义。换句话说,她展示了她的主要资料中的人物如何在为自己和他人创造包容性场所方面既失败又成功。虽然他们中的一些人因为他们的暴力殖民方法或因为他们继续以白人为中心而失败,但其他人在失去家园后顽固地坚持新的地方,或者在一再遭到拒绝的情况下勇敢地为自己找到一席之地,从而改变了归属。用Stehle自己的话来说,“创造空间就是形成新的相互关系”(160)。在这个过程中,新的联盟和亲属关系不仅涉及其他人,还涉及景观、花园和森林,以及公园、墓地和温室,这些都总结在这本书的标题中,以复数形式关注植物。虽然这种方法不一定是为了植物自身的利益或物种的特殊性(除了第五章中铅笔仙人掌的迷人例外),但它是一种工具,可以阅读文本和人类,并通过自然走向社会和环境正义。在实践中,这可能需要对背景景观和乡村空间进行历史或环境分析,或者对花、水果或盆栽的文化和美学意义进行分析,而在其他场合,它涉及对普遍存在的归属感隐喻(如根和茎)的拆解。在这样做的过程中,Stehle提醒我们,植物无处不在,值得关注,因为它们是分析的有效镜头——更重要的是,植物可以在关心和合作的关系中扮演政治角色。除了其结合的方法集中在社会和生态正义,这本书的第二个既定目标是在反种族主义,女权主义和非殖民化的方式德国研究材料的佳能的扩展。Stehle分析的主要作品都是由自认为是女性、酷儿、有色人种和/或经历过被迫迁移的艺术家创作的,他们的范围从Juli Zeh和Dörte Hansen、Valeska grisbach和Jessica Hausner、Anna sophie Hartmann和vyi chytilov到Ilija Trojanow和Saša Stanišić、Mo Asumang和Sheri Hagen、Elliot Blue和Faraz Shariat,以及yki材料。这本书汇集了文学和电影的各种类型(配有许多插图),并通过将这些作品与当代美国艺术家、地点和话语联系起来,将这些作品置于德语语境之外。这样一个跨学科的范围需要来自不同背景的理论框架,Stehle积极的引用实践将她的工作牢牢地定位在美国种族和性别以及德国电影和文学研究中。通过将美学、社会正义和环境问题与场所制作结合在一起,《植物、场所和权力》因此承担了话语、材料和历史的一个具有挑战性的交叉点,这必将激发研究和教学中的进一步讨论。亚利桑那大学Joela Jacobs版权所有©2023德国研究协会
{"title":"Plants, Places, and Power: Toward Social and Ecological Justice in German Literature and Film by Maria Stehle (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.a910199","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.a910199","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Plants, Places, and Power: Toward Social and Ecological Justice in German Literature and Film by Maria Stehle Joela Jacobs Plants, Places, and Power: Toward Social and Ecological Justice in German Literature and Film. By Maria Stehle. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2023. Pp. 186. Cloth $99.00. ISBN 9781640141254. Maria Stehle's Plants, Places, and Power tackles the complex intersection of land and belonging in the German context, which brings together the reverberations of the Nazi Blut und Boden legacy as well as European colonizer history with the critical urgency of the environmental future. By examining contemporary literature and film with feminist and anti-racist tools, the book aims to put forward intersectional models of relating to places that are both socially and ecologically just. In doing so, Stehle highlights topographies, the layers of history that shape places in myriad ways, and she emphasizes that place-making entails the resignification of such meanings. In other words, she shows how the figures in her primary sources both fail and succeed in inclusive place-making for themselves and others. While some of them fail because of their violent colonizer approaches or because they continue to center whiteness, others stubbornly hold on to new places after the loss of their home or defiantly make place for themselves despite repeated rejection and thus change who gets to belong. In Stehle's own words, \"to make place is to form new kinds of interrelations\" (160). The new alliances and ways of kin-making that go along with this process involve not just other people but landscapes, gardens, and forests, as well as parks, cemeteries, and greenhouses, which are summed up in the book's titular focus on plants in the plural. While this is not necessarily an approach to plants for their own sake or in their species specificity (with the fascinating exception of the pencil cactus in chapter five), it is a tool to read texts and people in and through nature toward both social and environmental justice. In practice, this can entail a historical or environmental analysis of background landscapes and rural spaces, or the cultural and aesthetic significance of flowers, fruit, or potted plants, while on other occasions, it involves the unpacking of pervasive metaphors of belonging such as roots and stem. In doing so, Stehle reminds us that plants are everywhere and worth paying attention to because they are productive lenses for analysis—and what's more, that plants can be political actors in relationships of care and collaboration. In addition to its combined methodological focus on social and ecological justice, the book's second stated goal is the expansion of the canon of German studies materials in antiracist, feminist, and decolonizing ways. The primary works Stehle analyzes are all composed by artists who identify as female, queer, of color, and/or [End Page 520] have experienced forced migration, and they range from Juli Zeh and ","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136093879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Year Zero to Economic Miracle: Hans Schwippert and Sep Ruf in Postwar West German Building Culture by Lynette Widder (review) 从零到经济奇迹:战后西德建筑文化中的汉斯·施维珀特和Sep Ruf作者:Lynette Widder
4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1353/gsr.2023.a910194
Reviewed by: Year Zero to Economic Miracle: Hans Schwippert and Sep Ruf in Postwar West German Building Culture by Lynette Widder Philipp Nielsen Year Zero to Economic Miracle: Hans Schwippert and Sep Ruf in Postwar West German Building Culture. By Lynette Widder. Zurich: gta Verlag, 2022. Pp. 320. Cloth €52.00. ISBN 9783856764272. Lynette Widder's Year Zero to Economic Miracle charts the architectural practice of Hans Schwippert and Sep Ruf, two prominent West German architects. Widder focuses on five iconic public commissions from the late 1940s, immediately following the establishment of the Federal Republic, until the early 1960s, with Schwippert's St. Hedwig's Cathedral, completed in 1963, literally straddling the German division. Next to the cathedral, the buildings covered (in chronological order) are: the West German parliament building (Bundeshaus) in Bonn (1948–1949) by Schwippert and the Academy of the Arts in Nuremberg (1950–1954) by Ruf for the early years; the West German Pavilion at the Brussels World Fair in 1958, which both men designed together with Egon Eiermann; and the College for Public Administration (Hochschule für Verwaltungswissenschaften) in Speyer (1957–1960) by Ruf. The book is structured into four chronological sections, three of which focus on the buildings and one on theoretical debates in postwar West Germany. In addition to the historical chapters, four more personal reflection chapters conclude each section: one on job books, one on the architecture critic Ulrich Conrads, one on the Ruf family archive, and one on construction drawings. These four reflection chapters chart Widder's own growing interest in Ruf and Schwippert and in becoming an architectural historian. Here, her evocative descriptions of architectural sources and of personal encounters do more than trace a personal journey. These chapters enrich the narrative of postwar architecture and architectural history itself when Widder describes the fate of the Ruf archive or the way the workbooks for the St. Hedwig's Cathedral reveal the complicated process of building across the German-German border. Widder's book forms part of a growing interest in postwar West German—and to a lesser extent East German—architecture and its preservation, which itself follows on the heels of a new wave of historiography on the postwar period. Notably, the book keeps East and West German architectural and political history connected by including St. Hedwig's Cathedral. The architectural clearly dominates, and Widder is an expert in making the field's materiality accessible to the lay reader. The impressive [End Page 509] visual quality of the book, with its over 150 images, many of them in color, further aids Widder in bringing her arguments and the architects' work to life. Widder has two wider objectives beyond recounting the careers of Schwippert and Ruf. For one, she situates the work of the two architects within the West German postwar debate about the genealogy of mod
《从零到经济奇迹:战后西德建筑文化中的汉斯·施威珀特和Sep Ruf》作者:Lynette Widder Philipp Nielsen作者:Lynette Widder苏黎世:gta Verlag, 2022。320页。布€52.00。ISBN 9783856764272。Lynette Widder的《从零到经济奇迹》描绘了两位著名的西德建筑师Hans Schwippert和Sep Ruf的建筑实践。Widder专注于五个标志性的公共项目,从20世纪40年代末开始,紧接着联邦共和国的建立,直到20世纪60年代初,其中包括Schwippert的St. Hedwig's Cathedral,于1963年完成,实际上跨越了德国的分裂。在大教堂旁边,覆盖的建筑(按时间顺序)是:西德议会大厦(Bundeshaus)在波恩(1948年至1949年)由Schwippert和艺术学院在纽伦堡(1950年至1954年)早期由Ruf;1958年布鲁塞尔世界博览会西德馆,两人与埃贡·艾尔曼(Egon Eiermann)共同设计;施佩尔的公共管理学院(Hochschule f r Verwaltungswissenschaften)(1957-1960)由Ruf。这本书按时间顺序分为四个部分,其中三个集中在建筑上,一个集中在战后西德的理论辩论上。除了历史章节,还有四个个人反思章节结束了每个部分:一个关于工作手册,一个关于建筑评论家乌尔里希康拉德,一个关于鲁夫家族档案,一个关于建筑图纸。这四章反映了Widder自己对Ruf和Schwippert越来越感兴趣,并成为一名建筑历史学家。在这里,她对建筑来源和个人遭遇的令人回味的描述不仅仅是追踪个人旅程。这些章节丰富了战后建筑和建筑历史本身的叙述,当Widder描述Ruf档案的命运或圣海德维格大教堂的工作手册揭示了跨越德国边境的复杂建筑过程时。威德的书体现了人们对战后西德建筑及其保护日益增长的兴趣——在较小程度上是对东德建筑及其保护的兴趣——这本身就紧跟在战后历史编纂学的新浪潮之后。值得注意的是,书中包括了圣海德威格大教堂,将东德和西德的建筑史和政治史联系在一起。建筑显然占主导地位,而Widder是一个让外行读者可以接触到这个领域的物质的专家。这本书的视觉质量令人印象深刻,其中有150多张图片,其中许多是彩色的,进一步帮助Widder将她的论点和建筑师的工作带入生活。除了叙述施威珀特和鲁夫的职业生涯,维达还有两个更大的目标。首先,她将两位建筑师的作品置于西德战后关于德国现代建筑谱系的辩论中。在20世纪50年代初,在达姆施塔特(Darmstadt)的一系列公开辩论中,这种讨论发生在期刊和公共会议(如Darmstädter Gespräche)的页面上,其关键是在西德建立一种现代建筑的可能性,这种建筑既没有被第三帝国玷污,又独立于现在主要活跃在美国的前包豪斯人员。除了这一理论辩论,Widder的目标是提供战后建筑的历史,特别是西德的建筑实践。在这里,她讲述了一个建筑师的故事,从战后的临时和个性化的工作,到更序列化和标准化的过程和设计,因为建筑业从20世纪50年代中期开始重建。在这一点上,韦德的叙述尤其有力。她从自己作为建筑师的经历中写作,使建筑师的计划和他们设想和制作的材料清晰可辨。Widder通过分析与Schwippert和Ruf的建筑相关的档案,展示了两位建筑师的不同风格,Schwippert在他的要求上更合作和开放,Ruf更严格和精确,如何使前者在早期蓬勃发展,而Ruf在后期蓬勃发展。当她离开他们的工作和特定的建筑,并参与到跨越…
{"title":"Year Zero to Economic Miracle: Hans Schwippert and Sep Ruf in Postwar West German Building Culture by Lynette Widder (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.a910194","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.a910194","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Year Zero to Economic Miracle: Hans Schwippert and Sep Ruf in Postwar West German Building Culture by Lynette Widder Philipp Nielsen Year Zero to Economic Miracle: Hans Schwippert and Sep Ruf in Postwar West German Building Culture. By Lynette Widder. Zurich: gta Verlag, 2022. Pp. 320. Cloth €52.00. ISBN 9783856764272. Lynette Widder's Year Zero to Economic Miracle charts the architectural practice of Hans Schwippert and Sep Ruf, two prominent West German architects. Widder focuses on five iconic public commissions from the late 1940s, immediately following the establishment of the Federal Republic, until the early 1960s, with Schwippert's St. Hedwig's Cathedral, completed in 1963, literally straddling the German division. Next to the cathedral, the buildings covered (in chronological order) are: the West German parliament building (Bundeshaus) in Bonn (1948–1949) by Schwippert and the Academy of the Arts in Nuremberg (1950–1954) by Ruf for the early years; the West German Pavilion at the Brussels World Fair in 1958, which both men designed together with Egon Eiermann; and the College for Public Administration (Hochschule für Verwaltungswissenschaften) in Speyer (1957–1960) by Ruf. The book is structured into four chronological sections, three of which focus on the buildings and one on theoretical debates in postwar West Germany. In addition to the historical chapters, four more personal reflection chapters conclude each section: one on job books, one on the architecture critic Ulrich Conrads, one on the Ruf family archive, and one on construction drawings. These four reflection chapters chart Widder's own growing interest in Ruf and Schwippert and in becoming an architectural historian. Here, her evocative descriptions of architectural sources and of personal encounters do more than trace a personal journey. These chapters enrich the narrative of postwar architecture and architectural history itself when Widder describes the fate of the Ruf archive or the way the workbooks for the St. Hedwig's Cathedral reveal the complicated process of building across the German-German border. Widder's book forms part of a growing interest in postwar West German—and to a lesser extent East German—architecture and its preservation, which itself follows on the heels of a new wave of historiography on the postwar period. Notably, the book keeps East and West German architectural and political history connected by including St. Hedwig's Cathedral. The architectural clearly dominates, and Widder is an expert in making the field's materiality accessible to the lay reader. The impressive [End Page 509] visual quality of the book, with its over 150 images, many of them in color, further aids Widder in bringing her arguments and the architects' work to life. Widder has two wider objectives beyond recounting the careers of Schwippert and Ruf. For one, she situates the work of the two architects within the West German postwar debate about the genealogy of mod","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136094523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
German Studies Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1