Unraveling China’s digital traces: evaluating communication scholarship through a sociotechnical lens

IF 2.1 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Chinese Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1080/17544750.2023.2264406
Kaiping Chen, Yingdan Lu, Yiming Wang
{"title":"Unraveling China’s digital traces: evaluating communication scholarship through a sociotechnical lens","authors":"Kaiping Chen, Yingdan Lu, Yiming Wang","doi":"10.1080/17544750.2023.2264406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn the growing trend of research using digital trace data to study human activities and opinions across different contexts, networked China has emerged as a prominent area of interest. However, research that critically examines the use, strengths, and weaknesses of existing digital trace methods, and the extent to which they can reveal the true landscape of digital China remains limited. To address these gaps, this study proposes a framework for examining and evaluating the knowledge production of digital trace research within a sociotechnical system comprising state actors, platform governance, digital civil society, and international forces. We then provide the first empirical examination of the knowledge claims and epistemic approaches used in digital trace communication scholarship that has studied China across different phases in the past 30 years. Grounded in the resulting empirical evidence, we discuss two common practices in existing digital trace research on China, how these approaches and perspectives could affect the validity and reliability of offering diverse viewpoints for studying and understanding digital China, and directions for improving these practices.Keywords: Digital traceknowledge productionevidence-driven approachChinasociotechnical systemcomputational social science AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank Steve Meyer, the data strategist from the University of Wisconsin–Madison Libraries, for helping us retrieve data from the Web of Science database. We are also grateful to Wenhong Chen, Zhongdang Pan, Stephen D. Reese, the anonymized reviewers, and the participants from the National Communication Association 107th Annual Convention for providing feedback at different stages of this project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by University of Wisconsin Madison, the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.Notes on contributorsKaiping ChenKaiping Chen (PhD, Stanford University) is an assistant professor in computational communication at the Department of Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin–Madison. Her research interests are public deliberation, science communication, and computational social science, and she has published in journals such as the Journal of Communication, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, New Media & Society, The American Political Science Review, Public Opinion Quarterly, and PNAS.Yingdan LuYingdan Lu (PhD, Stanford University) is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Northwestern University. Her research focuses on digital technology, political communication, and information manipulation in authoritarian and democratic contexts using computational and qualitative methods. Her work has appeared in peer-reviewed journals, such as Political Communication, New Media & Society, Human–Computer Interaction, and Computational Communication Research.Yiming WangYiming Wang is a PhD candidate in mass communications at the School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin–Madison. Her research focuses on the interplay between information ecology, identity politics, and other political attitudes and behaviors.","PeriodicalId":46367,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Communication","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2023.2264406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractIn the growing trend of research using digital trace data to study human activities and opinions across different contexts, networked China has emerged as a prominent area of interest. However, research that critically examines the use, strengths, and weaknesses of existing digital trace methods, and the extent to which they can reveal the true landscape of digital China remains limited. To address these gaps, this study proposes a framework for examining and evaluating the knowledge production of digital trace research within a sociotechnical system comprising state actors, platform governance, digital civil society, and international forces. We then provide the first empirical examination of the knowledge claims and epistemic approaches used in digital trace communication scholarship that has studied China across different phases in the past 30 years. Grounded in the resulting empirical evidence, we discuss two common practices in existing digital trace research on China, how these approaches and perspectives could affect the validity and reliability of offering diverse viewpoints for studying and understanding digital China, and directions for improving these practices.Keywords: Digital traceknowledge productionevidence-driven approachChinasociotechnical systemcomputational social science AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank Steve Meyer, the data strategist from the University of Wisconsin–Madison Libraries, for helping us retrieve data from the Web of Science database. We are also grateful to Wenhong Chen, Zhongdang Pan, Stephen D. Reese, the anonymized reviewers, and the participants from the National Communication Association 107th Annual Convention for providing feedback at different stages of this project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by University of Wisconsin Madison, the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.Notes on contributorsKaiping ChenKaiping Chen (PhD, Stanford University) is an assistant professor in computational communication at the Department of Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin–Madison. Her research interests are public deliberation, science communication, and computational social science, and she has published in journals such as the Journal of Communication, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, New Media & Society, The American Political Science Review, Public Opinion Quarterly, and PNAS.Yingdan LuYingdan Lu (PhD, Stanford University) is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Northwestern University. Her research focuses on digital technology, political communication, and information manipulation in authoritarian and democratic contexts using computational and qualitative methods. Her work has appeared in peer-reviewed journals, such as Political Communication, New Media & Society, Human–Computer Interaction, and Computational Communication Research.Yiming WangYiming Wang is a PhD candidate in mass communications at the School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin–Madison. Her research focuses on the interplay between information ecology, identity politics, and other political attitudes and behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解开中国的数字痕迹:从社会技术的角度评估传播学术
摘要:利用数字跟踪数据来研究不同背景下的人类活动和观点的研究趋势日益增长,网络中国已成为一个突出的研究领域。然而,批判性地审视现有数字追踪方法的使用、优势和弱点,以及它们能在多大程度上揭示数字中国的真实图景的研究仍然有限。为了解决这些差距,本研究提出了一个框架,用于在由国家行为体、平台治理、数字公民社会和国际力量组成的社会技术系统中检查和评估数字痕迹研究的知识生产。然后,我们对过去30年来在不同阶段研究中国的数字跟踪传播学术中使用的知识主张和认知方法进行了首次实证检验。基于所得的经验证据,我们讨论了现有中国数字足迹研究中的两种常见做法,这些方法和观点如何影响研究和理解数字中国的不同观点的有效性和可靠性,以及改进这些做法的方向。关键词:数字追踪知识生产证据驱动方法中国社会技术系统计算社会科学致谢我们要感谢来自威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校图书馆的数据战略家Steve Meyer帮助我们从Web of science数据库中检索数据。我们也感谢匿名审稿人陈文宏、潘忠当、Stephen D. Reese以及全国传播协会第107届年会的参与者在本项目的不同阶段提供的反馈。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究得到了威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校威斯康星校友研究基金会的支持。陈凯平(斯坦福大学博士),威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校生命科学传播系计算通信助理教授。她的研究兴趣是公共审议、科学传播和计算社会科学,并在《传播杂志》、《计算机媒介传播杂志》、《新媒体与社会》、《美国政治科学评论》、《民意季刊》和《美国国家科学院院刊》等期刊上发表过文章。陆英丹(斯坦福大学博士),美国西北大学传播研究系助理教授。她的研究主要集中在使用计算和定性方法的威权和民主背景下的数字技术、政治传播和信息操纵。她的作品曾发表在《政治传播》、《新媒体与社会》、《人机交互》和《计算传播研究》等同行评议期刊上。王一鸣,美国威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校新闻与大众传播学院大众传播学博士研究生。她的研究重点是信息生态、身份政治和其他政治态度和行为之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
How do corporate social responsibility perceptions facilitate advocacy behavior? The roles of organizational pride and responsible leadership Exploring freedom in mobile connectivity: a moderated mediation model linking mobile social media modes, availability pressure, and media habits Communicating LGBTQ-supportive CSR for corporate legitimacy: a cultural discourse analysis in Hong Kong Pro-liberalism vs. Nationalism: how critical opinion leaders challenge the persuasive effect of propaganda in China When politics meets dating: how moral concern, utopianism, and communication competence predict willingness to date across the political divide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1