The Potential of Rhizophagus intraradices, Bacillus thuringiensis Bt BMKP and Silica for Anthracnose Disease Control in Shallot

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Caraka Tani Journal of Sustainable Agriculture Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.20961/carakatani.v38i2.76536
Rizky Amallia, Suryanti Suryanti, Tri Joko
{"title":"The Potential of Rhizophagus intraradices, Bacillus thuringiensis Bt BMKP and Silica for Anthracnose Disease Control in Shallot","authors":"Rizky Amallia, Suryanti Suryanti, Tri Joko","doi":"10.20961/carakatani.v38i2.76536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anthracnose caused by <em>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</em> is a prevalent disease that poses a significant threat to shallot production in Indonesia. To mitigate this issue, the use of biological agents presents an alternative for disease control, reducing the inherent risks associated with the use of chemical pesticides. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the potentiality and mechanism of the biological agents (<em>Rhizophagus intraradices</em> and <em>Bacillus thuringiensis</em>) combined with silica. These agents were evaluated both individually and in combination to suppress the development of anthracnose in Tajuk variety shallot. The study was conducted in the laboratory and greenhouse, arranged in a completely randomized design with six treatments and three replications. The ability to suppress pathogenic fungi was determined based on <em>in vitro</em> antagonism tests of <em>B. thuringiensis</em>, disease severity, area under disease progress curve (AUDPC), plant height, number of leaves, number of tillers and the percentage of mycorrhizal fungal infections. Furthermore, the mycorrhizal infection on plant roots was observed using staining methods. The results showed that the <em>Bt</em> BMKP isolate was included in the <em>B. thuringiensis</em> strain RC9 group with the capacity to inhibit <em>C. gloeosporioides</em> <em>in vitro</em> by 18.88%. The combination treatment of <em>R. intraradices</em>, <em>B. thuringiensis</em> and silica reduced infection from anthracnose by 15.52% compared with control. These three treatments also significantly increased the agronomic performance of shallot up to six weeks after planting compared to control and other treatments.","PeriodicalId":32740,"journal":{"name":"Caraka Tani Journal of Sustainable Agriculture","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caraka Tani Journal of Sustainable Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v38i2.76536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides is a prevalent disease that poses a significant threat to shallot production in Indonesia. To mitigate this issue, the use of biological agents presents an alternative for disease control, reducing the inherent risks associated with the use of chemical pesticides. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the potentiality and mechanism of the biological agents (Rhizophagus intraradices and Bacillus thuringiensis) combined with silica. These agents were evaluated both individually and in combination to suppress the development of anthracnose in Tajuk variety shallot. The study was conducted in the laboratory and greenhouse, arranged in a completely randomized design with six treatments and three replications. The ability to suppress pathogenic fungi was determined based on in vitro antagonism tests of B. thuringiensis, disease severity, area under disease progress curve (AUDPC), plant height, number of leaves, number of tillers and the percentage of mycorrhizal fungal infections. Furthermore, the mycorrhizal infection on plant roots was observed using staining methods. The results showed that the Bt BMKP isolate was included in the B. thuringiensis strain RC9 group with the capacity to inhibit C. gloeosporioides in vitro by 18.88%. The combination treatment of R. intraradices, B. thuringiensis and silica reduced infection from anthracnose by 15.52% compared with control. These three treatments also significantly increased the agronomic performance of shallot up to six weeks after planting compared to control and other treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根噬菌、苏云金芽孢杆菌Bt BMKP和二氧化硅对青葱炭疽病的防治潜力
炭疽菌<em>炭疽菌</em>是一种流行疾病,对印度尼西亚的大葱生产构成重大威胁。为了缓解这一问题,使用生物制剂是控制疾病的另一种选择,减少了与使用化学农药有关的固有风险。因此,本研究旨在确定生物制剂(<em>Rhizophagus intraradices</em>和与二氧化硅结合的苏云金芽孢杆菌</em>)。评价了这些药剂单独施用和联合施用对大竹品种大葱炭疽病的抑制作用。研究在实验室和温室中进行,采用完全随机设计,6个处理,3个重复。对病原菌的抑制能力是基于<em>体外</em>B.拮抗试验;苏云金菌,疾病严重程度,疾病进展曲线下面积(AUDPC),株高,叶片数,分蘖数和菌根真菌感染百分比。并用染色法观察了菌根侵染对植物根系的影响。结果表明:<em>Bt</em>BMKP分离物被包括在<em>B中。thuringiensis< / em>菌株RC9组具有抑制<em>C的能力。gloeosporioides< / em>& lt; em> vitro< / em>了18.88%。联合治疗<em>R。intraradices< / em> & lt; em> B。thuringiensis< / em>与对照组相比,二氧化硅使炭疽病感染率降低了15.52%。与对照和其他处理相比,这三种处理在种植后6周内也显著提高了大葱的农艺性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fruit Morphology and Nutritional Composition of Different Genome Groups of Six Bananas Cultivars from Bali Island The Potential of Rhizophagus intraradices, Bacillus thuringiensis Bt BMKP and Silica for Anthracnose Disease Control in Shallot Value Chain Analysis of the Broiler Industry in the Southern Sector of Ghana Macronutrient Contents and Yield of Cocoa Resulting from Two Different Rejuvenation Techniques Carbon Stock, Carbon Fraction and Nitrogen Fraction of Soil Under Bamboo (Dendrocalamus asper Back.) and Non-Bamboo Vegetation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1