Interlimb Asymmetry of Maximal Handgrip Strength and Wrist Circumference in Elite International Male Boxers

Q2 Social Sciences Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.17309/tmfv.2023.5.11
Sandeep Kumar, Yajuvendra Singh Rajput
{"title":"Interlimb Asymmetry of Maximal Handgrip Strength and Wrist Circumference in Elite International Male Boxers","authors":"Sandeep Kumar, Yajuvendra Singh Rajput","doi":"10.17309/tmfv.2023.5.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study was to examine interlimb maximal handgrip strength asymmetry and wrist circumference asymmetry in amateur boxing across three weight classes and two different stances. Materials and methods. The study sample comprised 12 (flyweight:4; bantamweight:4; featherweight:4) amateur elite international boxers of India. Both limbs were tested for maximal handgrip strength and wrist circumference. For both tests, interlimb asymmetry was calculated using the interlimb asymmetry equation validated by Bishop et al. (2018). One-way ANOVA was used to compare asymmetries in three different weight classes, and an independent samples t-test was used to compare asymmetries in two different boxing stances. Results. The average wrist circumference asymmetry in different weight classes was 2.85±1.97 for flyweight, 1.29±0.75 for bantamweight, and 2.44±1.23 for featherweight, whereas the average maximal handgrip strength asymmetry was 4.91±3.75 for flyweight, 7.69±1.89 for bantamweight, and 5.80±2.89 for featherweight. Non-significant differences in interlimb asymmetry for wrist circumference and maximal handgrip strength in three different weight classes and two different stances were obtained (p > 0.05). Conclusions. The maximal handgrip strength asymmetry and wrist circumference asymmetry in elite international boxers were found to be less than 10 percent and observed non-significant differences in weight classes as well as stances indicate elite amateur international boxers to be less prone to interlimb asymmetry-related injuries and have favourable conditions for high performance.","PeriodicalId":36640,"journal":{"name":"Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2023.5.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine interlimb maximal handgrip strength asymmetry and wrist circumference asymmetry in amateur boxing across three weight classes and two different stances. Materials and methods. The study sample comprised 12 (flyweight:4; bantamweight:4; featherweight:4) amateur elite international boxers of India. Both limbs were tested for maximal handgrip strength and wrist circumference. For both tests, interlimb asymmetry was calculated using the interlimb asymmetry equation validated by Bishop et al. (2018). One-way ANOVA was used to compare asymmetries in three different weight classes, and an independent samples t-test was used to compare asymmetries in two different boxing stances. Results. The average wrist circumference asymmetry in different weight classes was 2.85±1.97 for flyweight, 1.29±0.75 for bantamweight, and 2.44±1.23 for featherweight, whereas the average maximal handgrip strength asymmetry was 4.91±3.75 for flyweight, 7.69±1.89 for bantamweight, and 5.80±2.89 for featherweight. Non-significant differences in interlimb asymmetry for wrist circumference and maximal handgrip strength in three different weight classes and two different stances were obtained (p > 0.05). Conclusions. The maximal handgrip strength asymmetry and wrist circumference asymmetry in elite international boxers were found to be less than 10 percent and observed non-significant differences in weight classes as well as stances indicate elite amateur international boxers to be less prone to interlimb asymmetry-related injuries and have favourable conditions for high performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际优秀男子拳击手最大握力与腕围的肢间不对称
摘要本研究旨在探讨业余拳击运动员在三个体重等级和两种不同姿势下的臂间最大握力不对称性和腕围不对称性。材料和方法。研究样本包括12个(蝇重4个;羽量级:4;轻量级:印度业余的国际精英拳击手。测试了两肢的最大握力和手腕围度。对于这两项测试,都使用Bishop等人(2018)验证的肢间不对称方程计算肢间不对称。采用单因素方差分析比较三个不同体重类别的不对称性,采用独立样本t检验比较两种不同拳击姿势的不对称性。结果。不同体重级别的平均腕围不对称度分别为蝇量级(2.85±1.97)、班量级(1.29±0.75)和羽量级(2.44±1.23),而最大握力不对称度分别为蝇量级(4.91±3.75)、班量级(7.69±1.89)和羽量级(5.80±2.89)。三种不同体重类别和两种不同姿势的腕部围度和最大握力的肢间不对称差异无统计学意义(p >0.05)。结论。国际优秀拳击运动员的最大握力不对称性和腕围不对称性均小于10%,并且在体重级别和姿势上观察到无显著差异,这表明国际优秀业余拳击运动员更不容易发生肢间不对称相关损伤,并具有良好的表现条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna
Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of Fitball Exercise on Body Composition, Flexibility, Muscular Strength-Endurance and Aerobic Capacity in Obese Working-Age Women Effect of Periodized Interval Training in Combination with Explosive Strength and Speed in Game-Like Situation on Agility and High Intensity Aerobic Capacity of Youth Soccer Players The Effects of School-Based Handball Intervention on 12–14-Year-Old Children’s Physical Fitness and Performance Relation between Start Reaction Time and Performance Time among Women Finalist Sprinters in the Olympic Games 2000 to 2020 Control and Evaluation of the Strength Abilities of Primary School-Aged Karate Boys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1