QbTest in the clinical assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A review of the evidence

Urban Gustafsson, Mikkel Hansen
{"title":"QbTest in the clinical assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A review of the evidence","authors":"Urban Gustafsson,&nbsp;Mikkel Hansen","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The technology described in this review is QbTest. This evaluation focuses on QbTest in the clinical assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), with emphasis on studies designed to evaluate the performance of QbTest as a decision support tool, that is, the intended use, and studies designed to evaluate discriminatory ability as a diagnostic test. A literature search of publications was made until May 2023. For the first part, studies investigating QbTest as a decision support tool were included. For the second part, studies designed to evaluate QbTest as a stand-alone test were included if sufficient information for a weighted average calculation of discriminatory power was included in the publication. Eleven studies on participants with ADHD were included for which QbTest was used in the diagnostic procedures of the disorder. One prospective randomized controlled study designed to evaluate QbTest when used for its intended purpose demonstrated a reduced time to diagnosis and increased diagnostic confidence. Ten studies designed to evaluate QbTest as a diagnostic test were identified. QbTest performed well with a weighted average sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.87 across studies with normative controls. In the challenging group of population with differential diagnosis (participants referred to a secondary or tertiary clinical care level), QbTest performed with a weighted average of 0.79 and 0.71 for both sensitivity and specificity. When including only studies of robust sample size (each study arm ≥50), the weighted averages were 0.83 and 0.86 for specificity and sensitivity, respectively. The addition of a QbTest reduced the time to a diagnostic decision without compromising diagnostic accuracy in a randomized control trial. When QbTest was evaluated for discriminative ability, an overall satisfactory weighted average sensitivity and specificity was found. The intended use of QbTest is to be used as a support tool rather than a standalone test in the clinical assessment of ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"1 4","pages":"270-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.43","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The technology described in this review is QbTest. This evaluation focuses on QbTest in the clinical assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), with emphasis on studies designed to evaluate the performance of QbTest as a decision support tool, that is, the intended use, and studies designed to evaluate discriminatory ability as a diagnostic test. A literature search of publications was made until May 2023. For the first part, studies investigating QbTest as a decision support tool were included. For the second part, studies designed to evaluate QbTest as a stand-alone test were included if sufficient information for a weighted average calculation of discriminatory power was included in the publication. Eleven studies on participants with ADHD were included for which QbTest was used in the diagnostic procedures of the disorder. One prospective randomized controlled study designed to evaluate QbTest when used for its intended purpose demonstrated a reduced time to diagnosis and increased diagnostic confidence. Ten studies designed to evaluate QbTest as a diagnostic test were identified. QbTest performed well with a weighted average sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.87 across studies with normative controls. In the challenging group of population with differential diagnosis (participants referred to a secondary or tertiary clinical care level), QbTest performed with a weighted average of 0.79 and 0.71 for both sensitivity and specificity. When including only studies of robust sample size (each study arm ≥50), the weighted averages were 0.83 and 0.86 for specificity and sensitivity, respectively. The addition of a QbTest reduced the time to a diagnostic decision without compromising diagnostic accuracy in a randomized control trial. When QbTest was evaluated for discriminative ability, an overall satisfactory weighted average sensitivity and specificity was found. The intended use of QbTest is to be used as a support tool rather than a standalone test in the clinical assessment of ADHD.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
QbTest 在注意缺陷多动障碍临床评估中的应用:证据综述
本综述中描述的技术是 QbTest。本次评估的重点是 QbTest 在注意力缺陷多动障碍 (ADHD) 临床评估中的应用,重点是旨在评估 QbTest 作为决策支持工具(即预期用途)的性能的研究,以及旨在评估 QbTest 作为诊断测试的鉴别能力的研究。文献检索截至 2023 年 5 月。第一部分包括将 QbTest 作为决策支持工具进行调查的研究。在第二部分中,如果出版物中有足够的信息可用于加权平均计算判别能力,则将旨在评估 QbTest 作为独立测试的研究纳入其中。共纳入了 11 项针对多动症患者的研究,其中 QbTest 被用于该疾病的诊断程序。其中一项前瞻性随机对照研究旨在评估 QbTest 在用于预期目的时的效果,结果表明 QbTest 缩短了诊断时间并提高了诊断可信度。十项研究旨在评估 QbTest 作为诊断测试的效果。QbTest 表现出色,在有常模对照的各项研究中,加权平均灵敏度为 0.89,特异度为 0.87。在具有鉴别诊断挑战性的人群(转诊至二级或三级临床医疗机构的参与者)中,QbTest 的加权平均灵敏度和特异度分别为 0.79 和 0.71。如果只包括样本量较大的研究(每个研究臂≥50),则特异性和灵敏度的加权平均值分别为 0.83 和 0.86。在一项随机对照试验中,增加 QbTest 缩短了做出诊断决定的时间,而不会影响诊断的准确性。在对 QbTest 的鉴别能力进行评估时,发现其加权平均灵敏度和特异性总体上令人满意。QbTest 的预期用途是在多动症的临床评估中用作辅助工具,而不是独立的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Suicide: The Experiences of Attempters in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing Mental Health Services for Adults in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review Hopelessness as a Mediator of the Association Between Parenting Factors and Adolescent Suicidality and Substance Use Among Juvenile Justice-Referred Youth Culturally Adapting a Mental Health Literacy Intervention With Youth (Stakeholders) for Implementation in Malawi Universities Attachment Style Predicts Emotion Regulation, Help-Seeking, and Recovery in Psychosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1