Prediction of hotspots pattern in Kalimantan using copula-based quantile regression and probabilistic model: a study of precipitation and dry spells across varied ENSO conditions

IF 2.4 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY VIETNAM JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.15625/2615-9783/19302
Mohamad K. Najib, Sri Nurdiati, Ardhasena Sopaheluwakan
{"title":"Prediction of hotspots pattern in Kalimantan using copula-based quantile regression and probabilistic model: a study of precipitation and dry spells across varied ENSO conditions","authors":"Mohamad K. Najib, Sri Nurdiati, Ardhasena Sopaheluwakan","doi":"10.15625/2615-9783/19302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hotspots in Kalimantan are significantly correlated with local and global climatic conditions. These hotspots have been represented in previous explorations using copula-based mean regression technique. However, this study focused on advancing hotspots model through the use of copula-based quantile regression. Probabilistic method was also introduced to depict the characteristics of hotspots in Kalimantan. To achieve this objective, the technique of the inference of functions for margins was applied. Several copula functions, including Gumbel, Clayton, Frank, Joe, Galambos, BB1, BB6, BB7, and BB8, were meticulously chosen. The selection of the most suitable copula was based on the results of the Anderson-Darling and Cramer-von Mises hypothesis tests. The results showed that the combination of quantile and mean regression yielded satisfactory results. Moreover, an uncertainty range was established by assessing the outermost quantile, which aided the assessment of the reliability of estimated hotspots. Probabilistic model introduced a fresh viewpoint to modeling process. Instead of forecasting an exact value, model estimated the probability of hotspots occurrences based on specific climatic conditions. Among the three scenarios examined, precipitation-based model showed an average accuracy of 89.7%, while dry spells-based outperformed the value with a score of 90.3%. After evaluating the results from both regression and probabilistic model, dry spells-based method outperformed precipitation-based. On the other hand, precipitation-based performed better in capturing certain minor details compared to dry spells-based model.","PeriodicalId":23639,"journal":{"name":"VIETNAM JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES","volume":"65 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VIETNAM JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-9783/19302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hotspots in Kalimantan are significantly correlated with local and global climatic conditions. These hotspots have been represented in previous explorations using copula-based mean regression technique. However, this study focused on advancing hotspots model through the use of copula-based quantile regression. Probabilistic method was also introduced to depict the characteristics of hotspots in Kalimantan. To achieve this objective, the technique of the inference of functions for margins was applied. Several copula functions, including Gumbel, Clayton, Frank, Joe, Galambos, BB1, BB6, BB7, and BB8, were meticulously chosen. The selection of the most suitable copula was based on the results of the Anderson-Darling and Cramer-von Mises hypothesis tests. The results showed that the combination of quantile and mean regression yielded satisfactory results. Moreover, an uncertainty range was established by assessing the outermost quantile, which aided the assessment of the reliability of estimated hotspots. Probabilistic model introduced a fresh viewpoint to modeling process. Instead of forecasting an exact value, model estimated the probability of hotspots occurrences based on specific climatic conditions. Among the three scenarios examined, precipitation-based model showed an average accuracy of 89.7%, while dry spells-based outperformed the value with a score of 90.3%. After evaluating the results from both regression and probabilistic model, dry spells-based method outperformed precipitation-based. On the other hand, precipitation-based performed better in capturing certain minor details compared to dry spells-based model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于copula分位数回归和概率模型的加里曼丹地区热点模式预测:不同ENSO条件下降水和干旱期的研究
加里曼丹的热点与当地和全球气候条件显著相关。这些热点已经在以前的探索中使用基于copula的均值回归技术来表示。然而,本研究的重点是通过使用基于copula的分位数回归来推进热点模型。采用概率方法描述了加里曼丹地区热点的特征。为了实现这一目标,应用了边界函数推理技术。几个联结函数,包括Gumbel, Clayton, Frank, Joe, Galambos, BB1, BB6, BB7和BB8,都是经过精心挑选的。选择最合适的联结是基于安德森-达林和克莱默-冯·米塞斯假设检验的结果。结果表明,分位数与均值相结合的回归结果令人满意。此外,通过评估最外面的分位数建立了一个不确定范围,这有助于评估估计热点的可靠性。概率模型为建模过程引入了一种新的视角。该模型不是预测一个精确的值,而是根据特定的气候条件估计热点发生的概率。在研究的三种情景中,基于降水的模型的平均准确率为89.7%,而基于干旱期的模型的平均准确率为90.3%。在对回归模型和概率模型的结果进行评估后,基于干旱期的方法优于基于降水的方法。另一方面,与基于干旱的模型相比,基于降水的模型在捕捉某些次要细节方面表现得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
VIETNAM JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES
VIETNAM JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of drought on enzyme activities and hotspot distribution along plant roots Geotechnical properties of natural sand-mixed granulated blast furnace slag applied to the sand compaction pile method Faecal contamination and its relationship with some environmental variables of four urban rivers in inner Hanoi city, Vietnam Prediction of hotspots pattern in Kalimantan using copula-based quantile regression and probabilistic model: a study of precipitation and dry spells across varied ENSO conditions Radiological risk assessment and characteristics of 210Po in selected water sources in Quang Nam and Da Nang, Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1