Comparison and Analysis of SNN and RNN Results for Option Pricing and Deep Hedging Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)

Hong Jae Lee, Tae Seog Kim
{"title":"Comparison and Analysis of SNN and RNN Results for Option Pricing and Deep Hedging Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)","authors":"Hong Jae Lee, Tae Seog Kim","doi":"10.38115/asgba.2023.20.5.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to present alternative methods to overcome market limitations such as the assumption of fixing the dynamics of underlying assets and market friction for the traditional Black-Scholes option pricing model. As for the research method of this paper, Adam is used as the gradient descent optimizer for the hedging model of the call option short portfolio using artificial neural network models SNN (simple neural network) and RNN (recurrent neural network) as analysis models, and deep neural network (deep neural network) is used as the hedging model. neural network) methodology was applied.
 The research results of this paper are as follows. Regarding the ATM call option price, the BS model showed 10.245, the risk neutral model showed 10.268, the SNN-DH model showed 11.834, and the RNN-DH model showed 11.882. Therefore, it appears that there is a slight difference in the call option price according to each analysis model. At this time, the DH analysis data sample is 100,000 (1×) training samples generated by Monte Carlo Simulation, and the number of testing samples is the training sample. 20% (20,000 pieces) was used, and the option payoff function is lambda(), which is -max(, 0). In addition, the option price and P&L (P&L) of SNN-DH and RNN-DH appear linearly on the basis, and the longer the remaining maturity, the closer the delta value of SNN-DH and BS to the distribution of the S-curve, and the closer the expiration date, the closer the two models are. Delta is densely distributed between 0 and 1. As for the total loss of delta hedging of the short call option position, SNN-DH was -0.0027 and RNN-DH was -0.0061, indicating that the total hedged profit and loss was close to 0.
 The implications of this study are to present DL techniques based on AI methods as an alternative way to overcome limitations such as fixing underlying asset dynamics and market friction of the traditional Black-Scholes model. In addition, it is an independent analysis model that considers valid robust tools by applying deep neural network algorithms for portfolio hedging problems. One limitation of the research is that it analyzed the model under the assumption of zero transaction costs, so future studies should consider this aspect.","PeriodicalId":497662,"journal":{"name":"글로벌경영학회지","volume":"73 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"글로벌경영학회지","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38115/asgba.2023.20.5.146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present alternative methods to overcome market limitations such as the assumption of fixing the dynamics of underlying assets and market friction for the traditional Black-Scholes option pricing model. As for the research method of this paper, Adam is used as the gradient descent optimizer for the hedging model of the call option short portfolio using artificial neural network models SNN (simple neural network) and RNN (recurrent neural network) as analysis models, and deep neural network (deep neural network) is used as the hedging model. neural network) methodology was applied. The research results of this paper are as follows. Regarding the ATM call option price, the BS model showed 10.245, the risk neutral model showed 10.268, the SNN-DH model showed 11.834, and the RNN-DH model showed 11.882. Therefore, it appears that there is a slight difference in the call option price according to each analysis model. At this time, the DH analysis data sample is 100,000 (1×) training samples generated by Monte Carlo Simulation, and the number of testing samples is the training sample. 20% (20,000 pieces) was used, and the option payoff function is lambda(), which is -max(, 0). In addition, the option price and P&L (P&L) of SNN-DH and RNN-DH appear linearly on the basis, and the longer the remaining maturity, the closer the delta value of SNN-DH and BS to the distribution of the S-curve, and the closer the expiration date, the closer the two models are. Delta is densely distributed between 0 and 1. As for the total loss of delta hedging of the short call option position, SNN-DH was -0.0027 and RNN-DH was -0.0061, indicating that the total hedged profit and loss was close to 0. The implications of this study are to present DL techniques based on AI methods as an alternative way to overcome limitations such as fixing underlying asset dynamics and market friction of the traditional Black-Scholes model. In addition, it is an independent analysis model that considers valid robust tools by applying deep neural network algorithms for portfolio hedging problems. One limitation of the research is that it analyzed the model under the assumption of zero transaction costs, so future studies should consider this aspect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SNN与RNN在人工神经网络期权定价与深度套期保值中的比较分析
本研究的目的是提出克服市场限制的替代方法,如传统的Black-Scholes期权定价模型中固定标的资产动态和市场摩擦的假设。本文的研究方法以Adam为梯度下降优化器,采用人工神经网络模型SNN (simple neural network)和RNN (recurrent neural network)作为分析模型,采用深度神经网络(deep neural network)作为套期保值模型。神经网络)方法。 本文的研究成果如下:对于ATM看涨期权价格,BS模型为10.245,风险中性模型为10.268,SNN-DH模型为11.834,RNN-DH模型为11.882。因此,根据每个分析模型,看涨期权的价格似乎略有不同。此时,DH分析数据样本为Monte Carlo Simulation生成的100,000 (1x)个训练样本,测试样本个数为训练样本。采用20%(20000件),期权收益函数为lambda(),即-max(, 0)。此外,SNN-DH和RNN-DH的期权价格和P&L (P&L)在此基础上线性呈现,剩余期限越长,SNN-DH和BS的delta值越接近s曲线分布,到期日越接近,两种模型越接近。集中分布在0和1之间。对于看涨期权空头头寸delta套期保值的总损失,SNN-DH为-0.0027,RNN-DH为-0.0061,说明套期保值的总盈亏接近0. 本研究的意义是提出基于人工智能方法的深度学习技术,作为克服诸如固定潜在资产动态和传统Black-Scholes模型的市场摩擦等局限性的替代方法。此外,它是一个独立的分析模型,通过将深度神经网络算法应用于投资组合对冲问题,考虑了有效的鲁棒性工具。本研究的一个局限性是分析了交易成本为零的假设下的模型,未来的研究应该考虑这方面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of the Interaction Effect of Free Cash Flow Information and ESG Evaluation Information on Foreign Ownership The effect of tax system of corporate tax on unappropriated earnings on the Tax avoidance: Focus on ESG-Scored performance Comparative Study on Operational Optimization with Contactless e-Service Encounters Comparison and Analysis of SNN and RNN Results for Option Pricing and Deep Hedging Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) A Study on the Application of Zero Trust Security Model in the Financial Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1