“It’s like a happy little affirmation circle”: a grounded theory study of nonbinary peoples’ internal processes for navigating binary gender norms

IF 10.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL International Journal of Transgender Health Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1080/26895269.2023.2268052
Katelyn O. Coburn, Amber Vennum, Christi R. McGeorge, Melinda Stafford Markham, Chelsea M. Spencer
{"title":"<i>“It’s like a happy little affirmation circle”:</i> a grounded theory study of nonbinary peoples’ internal processes for navigating binary gender norms","authors":"Katelyn O. Coburn, Amber Vennum, Christi R. McGeorge, Melinda Stafford Markham, Chelsea M. Spencer","doi":"10.1080/26895269.2023.2268052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractBackground: Nonbinary people experience marginalization through discrimination, rejection, microaggressions, and stigma as a result of not always conforming to societal gender norms embedded in the gender binary. There is limited research about how nonbinary Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) living in the United States navigate societally enforced binary gender norms, which is especially important to understand given how racism and Euro-colonization have enforced the gender binary. Better understanding the internal strategies nonbinary people use to cope, embody affirmation, and regulate emotions in response to marginalizing experiences could increase understanding of how to best prevent and address the health disparities experienced by nonbinary people.Aim: Drawing on the practices of interrogating norms central to queer theory with a sensitization to racism and settler colonialism, this study aimed to identify a framework to understand nonbinary peoples’ processes of navigating gender norms internally through their lived experiences with an awareness of how context impacts these processes.Method: This qualitative interview study utilized construcitivist grounded theory methodology, guided by queer theory. Twenty-one nonbinary individuals were interviewed over Zoom with 15 being BIPOC.Results: Participants navigated binary gender norms internally by self-defining affirmative nonbinary ways of being, noticing affirmation in a chosen community that allowed them to experience existing authentically outside of binary gender norms, and internally connecting to an embodied, authentic sense of gender within themselves and in community with other nonbinary people. These internal processes were influenced by two contextual factors: societal and cultural expectations of gender; and the contextual impacts of holding multiple marginalized identities.Discussion: Understanding the contexts of the gender binary, racism, and cissexism that impact nonbinary people on a daily basis is crucial for mental health professionals, researchers, policy makers, and creators of gender inclusive education and support programs to support and affirm nonbinary people.Keywords: BIPOCdiscriminationembodimentgender binarygrounded theorynonbinary AcknowledgmentsThe authors extend deep gratitude and appreciation to those who participated in this study.Ethical approvalAll procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.Informed consentInformed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.Disclosure statementThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.Notes1 We are using BIPOC to intentionally acknowledge the history of enslavement and genocide of Black and Indigenous peoples in the U.S. and how this shapes differential racialization experiences among BIPOC, and the on-going racial disparities experienced by Black and Indigenous people in the U.S.Additional informationFundingFunding for this project came from the Kansas State University- Robert H. Poresky Assistantship in Family Studies and Human Services.","PeriodicalId":48480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transgender Health","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transgender Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2023.2268052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractBackground: Nonbinary people experience marginalization through discrimination, rejection, microaggressions, and stigma as a result of not always conforming to societal gender norms embedded in the gender binary. There is limited research about how nonbinary Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) living in the United States navigate societally enforced binary gender norms, which is especially important to understand given how racism and Euro-colonization have enforced the gender binary. Better understanding the internal strategies nonbinary people use to cope, embody affirmation, and regulate emotions in response to marginalizing experiences could increase understanding of how to best prevent and address the health disparities experienced by nonbinary people.Aim: Drawing on the practices of interrogating norms central to queer theory with a sensitization to racism and settler colonialism, this study aimed to identify a framework to understand nonbinary peoples’ processes of navigating gender norms internally through their lived experiences with an awareness of how context impacts these processes.Method: This qualitative interview study utilized construcitivist grounded theory methodology, guided by queer theory. Twenty-one nonbinary individuals were interviewed over Zoom with 15 being BIPOC.Results: Participants navigated binary gender norms internally by self-defining affirmative nonbinary ways of being, noticing affirmation in a chosen community that allowed them to experience existing authentically outside of binary gender norms, and internally connecting to an embodied, authentic sense of gender within themselves and in community with other nonbinary people. These internal processes were influenced by two contextual factors: societal and cultural expectations of gender; and the contextual impacts of holding multiple marginalized identities.Discussion: Understanding the contexts of the gender binary, racism, and cissexism that impact nonbinary people on a daily basis is crucial for mental health professionals, researchers, policy makers, and creators of gender inclusive education and support programs to support and affirm nonbinary people.Keywords: BIPOCdiscriminationembodimentgender binarygrounded theorynonbinary AcknowledgmentsThe authors extend deep gratitude and appreciation to those who participated in this study.Ethical approvalAll procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.Informed consentInformed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.Disclosure statementThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.Notes1 We are using BIPOC to intentionally acknowledge the history of enslavement and genocide of Black and Indigenous peoples in the U.S. and how this shapes differential racialization experiences among BIPOC, and the on-going racial disparities experienced by Black and Indigenous people in the U.S.Additional informationFundingFunding for this project came from the Kansas State University- Robert H. Poresky Assistantship in Family Studies and Human Services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“这就像一个快乐的小肯定圈”:对非二元性别人群驾驭二元性别规范的内在过程的扎根理论研究
【摘要】背景:非二元性别人群由于不总是符合社会性别规范而遭受歧视、排斥、微侵犯和污名化等边缘化。关于生活在美国的非二元黑人、土著和有色人种(BIPOC)如何驾驭社会强制的二元性别规范的研究有限,考虑到种族主义和欧洲殖民化如何强制执行性别二元,这一点对于理解尤为重要。更好地了解非二元人群在应对边缘化经历时使用的内部策略,体现肯定和调节情绪,可以增加对如何最好地预防和解决非二元人群所经历的健康差异的理解。目的:通过对酷儿理论核心规范的质疑,以及对种族主义和定居者殖民主义的敏感性,本研究旨在确定一个框架,以理解非二元性别人群通过他们的生活经历在内部导航性别规范的过程,并意识到环境如何影响这些过程。方法:以酷儿理论为指导,采用建构主义扎根理论的定性访谈研究方法。21名非二元个体通过Zoom接受了采访,其中15名是BIPOC。结果:参与者通过自我定义肯定的非二元存在方式在内部导航二元性别规范,在一个选择的社区中注意到肯定,允许他们体验二元性别规范之外的真实存在,并在内部与自己和社区中其他非二元人群的具体,真实的性别感联系起来。这些内部过程受到两个背景因素的影响:社会和文化对性别的期望;以及持有多重边缘身份的语境影响。讨论:了解日常生活中影响非二元性别人群的性别二元、种族主义和顺性歧视的背景,对于心理健康专业人员、研究人员、政策制定者和性别包容性教育的创造者以及支持和肯定非二元性别人群的支持项目至关重要。关键词:bipocc歧视体现性别二元扎根理论非二元致谢作者对所有参与本研究的人员表示衷心的感谢。伦理批准:在涉及人类受试者的研究中执行的所有程序都符合机构和/或国家研究委员会的伦理标准,以及1964年赫尔辛基宣言及其后来的修正案或类似的伦理标准。知情同意从研究中包括的所有个体参与者处获得知情同意。声明作者声明他们没有利益冲突。注1:我们使用BIPOC有意承认美国黑人和土著人民的奴役和种族灭绝的历史,以及这如何影响BIPOC中不同的种族化经历,以及美国黑人和土著人民正在经历的种族差异。额外信息资金本项目的资金来自堪萨斯州立大学-罗伯特·h·波雷斯基家庭研究和人类服务助理奖学金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The gender congruences and life satisfaction scale for transgender and gender-diverse youth (GCLS-Y): a validation study with samples from the UK and US Parental perspectives on fertility preservation for their trans and gender-expansive children: Reflections on complexities of autonomy, support, and societal realities Knowledge and dispositions of caring professionals in school settings regarding trans, gender diverse and non-binary students: A scoping review of empirical research The impact of microaggressions on the mental health of trans and gender-diverse people: A scoping review “Your stress is mine too”: a qualitative exploration of couple-level minority stress in trans-inclusive couples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1